Corneal biomechanics after small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Chen, Songbai [1 ]
Ma, Hongjie [2 ]
Zhao, Congling [1 ]
机构
[1] Aier Huangpi Eye Hosp, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Zhengzhou Aier Eye Hosp, Zhengzhou, Henan, Peoples R China
关键词
corneal biomechanics; corvis ST (CST); femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK); ocular response analyzer (ORA); small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE); ASSISTED LASIK; MYOPIA; FLAP; CAP;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000034580
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background:Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) have been extensively studied as the main surgical methods for corneal refractive surgery. However, there is no consensus on whether SMILE is superior to FS-LASIK in corneal biomechanics. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis used the results of ocular response analyzer and corvis ST to explore whether SMILE is superior to FS-LASIK in corneal biomechanics. Methods:The literature was searched in PubMed, EMBASE, and Controlled Trials Register databases. The Cochrane Collaboration's "risk of bias" tool was used to evaluate the quality of the included randomized clinical trials, and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to evaluate the included non-randomized controlled trials. The results were analyzed using Revman 5.3. Results:Sixteen studies (3 randomized clinical trials and 13 non-randomized controlled trials) were included in this meta-analysis. There was no statistical difference in corneal biomechanics between SMILE and FS-LASIK in corneal hysteresis [mean difference (MD), 0.20; 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.09, 0.49; P = .18] and corneal resistant factor (MD, 0.31; 95% CI: -0.09, 0.71; P = .13), A1 time (MD, -0.02; 95% CI: -0.11, 0.07; P = .66), A1 length (MD, 0.01; 95% CI: -0.01, 0.03; P = .42), A1 velocity (MD, 0.00; 95% CI: -0.01, 0.01; P = .85), A2 velocity (MD, -0.01; 95% CI: -0.11, 0.09; P = .86), HC time (MD, 0.12; 95% CI: -0.13, 0.38; P = .35), The stiffness parameter at first applanation (MD, -7.91; 95% CI: -17.96, 2.14; P = .12), The ratio between the deformation amplitude 2 mm away from apex and the apical deformation (MD, 0.01; 95% CI: -0.26, 0.27; P = .96). Conclusion:A comprehensive assessment of the parameters of ocular response analyzer and corvis ST showed that SMILE is not superior to LASIK in corneal biomechanics 3 months post-surgery.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Bilateral ectasia after femtosecond laser-assisted small-incision lenticule extraction
    El-Naggar, Mohamed Tarek
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2015, 41 (04) : 884 - 888
  • [42] Longitudinal evaluation of corneal tomography after small incision lenticule extraction
    Satitpitakul, Vannarut
    Chotikkakamthorn, Patraramon
    Suwanwatana, Jirat
    Kasetsuwan, Ngamjit
    Puangsricharern, Vilavun
    Reinprayoon, Usanee
    EYE, 2023, 37 (02) : 373 - 374
  • [43] Higher-Order-Aberrations Following Hyperopia Treatment: Small Incision Lenticule Extraction, Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis and Lenticule Implantation
    Liu, Yu-Chi
    Wen, Jiaxin
    Teo, Ericia Pei Wen
    Williams, Geraint P.
    Lwin, Nyein Chan
    Mehta, Jodhbir S.
    TRANSLATIONAL VISION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 7 (02):
  • [44] Early recovery of quality of vision and optical performance after refractive surgery: Small-incision lenticule extraction versus laser in situ keratomileusis
    Chiche, Anthony
    Trinh, Liem
    Saada, Ornella
    Faure, Jean-Francois
    Auclin, Francois
    Baudouin, Christophe
    Denoyer, Alexandre
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2018, 44 (09) : 1073 - 1079
  • [45] Comparison of corneal biomechanics after myopic small-incision lenticule extraction compared to LASIK: an ex vivo study
    Kanellopoulos, Anastasios John
    CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2018, 12 : 237 - 245
  • [46] Comparison of biomechanical effects of small incision lenticule extraction and laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis
    Chen, Minjie
    Yu, Manrong
    Dai, Jinhui
    ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2016, 94 (07) : E586 - E591
  • [47] Comparison of corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor after small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK: A prospective fellow eye study
    Agca, Alper
    Ozgurhan, Engin Bilge
    Demirok, Ahmet
    Bozkurt, Ercument
    Celik, Ugur
    Ozkaya, Abdullah
    Cankaya, Ilker
    Yilmaz, Omer Faruk
    CONTACT LENS & ANTERIOR EYE, 2014, 37 (02) : 77 - 80
  • [48] Early Corneal Wound Healing Response After Small Incision Lenticule Extraction
    Sun, Yuan
    Zhang, Ting
    Liu, Manli
    Zhou, Yugui
    Weng, Shengbei
    Yang, Xiaonan
    Liu, Quan
    CORNEA, 2019, 38 (12) : 1582 - 1588
  • [49] Comparison of the Optical Quality between Small Incision Lenticule Extraction and Femtosecond Laser LASIK
    Jin, Ying
    Wang, Yan
    Xu, Lulu
    Zuo, Tong
    Li, Hua
    Dou, Rui
    Zhang, Jiamei
    JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2016, 2016
  • [50] Changes in Corneal Deformation Parameters after Lenticule Creation and Extraction during Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) Procedure
    Shen, Yang
    Zhao, Jing
    Yao, Peijun
    Miao, Huamao
    Niu, Lingling
    Wang, Xiaoying
    Zhou, Xingtao
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (08):