Corneal biomechanics after small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Chen, Songbai [1 ]
Ma, Hongjie [2 ]
Zhao, Congling [1 ]
机构
[1] Aier Huangpi Eye Hosp, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Zhengzhou Aier Eye Hosp, Zhengzhou, Henan, Peoples R China
关键词
corneal biomechanics; corvis ST (CST); femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK); ocular response analyzer (ORA); small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE); ASSISTED LASIK; MYOPIA; FLAP; CAP;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000034580
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background:Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) have been extensively studied as the main surgical methods for corneal refractive surgery. However, there is no consensus on whether SMILE is superior to FS-LASIK in corneal biomechanics. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis used the results of ocular response analyzer and corvis ST to explore whether SMILE is superior to FS-LASIK in corneal biomechanics. Methods:The literature was searched in PubMed, EMBASE, and Controlled Trials Register databases. The Cochrane Collaboration's "risk of bias" tool was used to evaluate the quality of the included randomized clinical trials, and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to evaluate the included non-randomized controlled trials. The results were analyzed using Revman 5.3. Results:Sixteen studies (3 randomized clinical trials and 13 non-randomized controlled trials) were included in this meta-analysis. There was no statistical difference in corneal biomechanics between SMILE and FS-LASIK in corneal hysteresis [mean difference (MD), 0.20; 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.09, 0.49; P = .18] and corneal resistant factor (MD, 0.31; 95% CI: -0.09, 0.71; P = .13), A1 time (MD, -0.02; 95% CI: -0.11, 0.07; P = .66), A1 length (MD, 0.01; 95% CI: -0.01, 0.03; P = .42), A1 velocity (MD, 0.00; 95% CI: -0.01, 0.01; P = .85), A2 velocity (MD, -0.01; 95% CI: -0.11, 0.09; P = .86), HC time (MD, 0.12; 95% CI: -0.13, 0.38; P = .35), The stiffness parameter at first applanation (MD, -7.91; 95% CI: -17.96, 2.14; P = .12), The ratio between the deformation amplitude 2 mm away from apex and the apical deformation (MD, 0.01; 95% CI: -0.26, 0.27; P = .96). Conclusion:A comprehensive assessment of the parameters of ocular response analyzer and corvis ST showed that SMILE is not superior to LASIK in corneal biomechanics 3 months post-surgery.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of biomechanical effects of small-incision lenticule extraction and laser in situ keratomileusis: Finite-element analysis
    Roy, Abhijit Sinha
    Dupps, William J., Jr.
    Roberts, Cynthia J.
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2014, 40 (06) : 971 - 980
  • [32] Comparison of Perioperative Contrast Sensitivity between Laser in situ Keratomileusis and Small-incision Lenticule Extraction
    Park, Se Young
    Kwag, Joo Young
    Hyun, Joo
    Pak, Kyu Hong
    Chung, Sung Kun
    Choi, Jin Seok
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN OPHTHALMOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2020, 61 (08): : 890 - 896
  • [33] Comparison of Corneal Biological Healing After Femtosecond LASIK and Small Incision Lenticule Extraction Procedure
    Xia, Lei
    Zhang, Jing
    Wu, Junshu
    Yu, Keming
    CURRENT EYE RESEARCH, 2016, 41 (09) : 1202 - 1208
  • [34] Optical Quality and Intraocular Scattering After Femtosecond Laser Small Incision Lenticule Extraction
    Miao, Huamao
    He, Li
    Shen, Yang
    Li, Meiyan
    Yu, Yongfu
    Zhou, Xingtao
    JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2014, 30 (05) : 296 - +
  • [35] Differences in ocular high order aberrations before and after small incision lenticule extraction for correction of myopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Du, Yifan
    Di, Yu
    Yang, Shan
    Mo, Fei
    Cui, Ge
    Chen, Di
    Li, Ying
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2024, 11
  • [36] Vision-related quality of life and visual outcomes after small-incision lenticule extraction and laser in situ keratomileusis
    Ang, Marcus
    Ho, Henrietta
    Fenwick, Eva
    Lamoureux, Ecosse
    Htoon, Hla M.
    Koh, Jane
    Tan, Donald
    Mehta, Jodhbir S.
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2015, 41 (10) : 2136 - 2144
  • [37] Femtosecond-laser-assisted Small Incision Lenticule Extraction to Treat Refractive Error: A Narrative Review
    Bamahfouz, Ashjan Y.
    MIDDLE EAST AFRICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 30 (04) : 203 - 213
  • [38] Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser LASIK: comparison of corneal wound healing and inflammation
    Dong, Zixian
    Zhou, Xingtao
    Wu, Jihong
    Zhang, Zhehuan
    Li, Tao
    Zhou, Zimei
    Zhang, Shenghai
    Li, Gang
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2014, 98 (02) : 263 - 269
  • [39] Comparative study of functional optical zone: small incision lenticule extraction versus femtosecond laser assisted excimer laser keratomileusis
    Song, Yao-Wen
    Cui, Meng-Fan
    Feng, Yi
    Qu, Min
    Gao, Yan
    He, Rui
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 16 (02) : 238 - 244
  • [40] Evaluation of the Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer and Ganglion Cell Layer After Laser-Assisted in situ Keratomileusis, Femtosecond-Laser in-situ Keratomileusis, and Small Incision Lenticule Extraction Using Optical Coherence Tomography
    Shaaban, Yasmine Maher
    Badran, Tamer Abdel Fattah
    CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2025, 19 : 973 - 984