Corneal biomechanics after small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Chen, Songbai [1 ]
Ma, Hongjie [2 ]
Zhao, Congling [1 ]
机构
[1] Aier Huangpi Eye Hosp, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Zhengzhou Aier Eye Hosp, Zhengzhou, Henan, Peoples R China
关键词
corneal biomechanics; corvis ST (CST); femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK); ocular response analyzer (ORA); small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE); ASSISTED LASIK; MYOPIA; FLAP; CAP;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000034580
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background:Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) have been extensively studied as the main surgical methods for corneal refractive surgery. However, there is no consensus on whether SMILE is superior to FS-LASIK in corneal biomechanics. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis used the results of ocular response analyzer and corvis ST to explore whether SMILE is superior to FS-LASIK in corneal biomechanics. Methods:The literature was searched in PubMed, EMBASE, and Controlled Trials Register databases. The Cochrane Collaboration's "risk of bias" tool was used to evaluate the quality of the included randomized clinical trials, and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to evaluate the included non-randomized controlled trials. The results were analyzed using Revman 5.3. Results:Sixteen studies (3 randomized clinical trials and 13 non-randomized controlled trials) were included in this meta-analysis. There was no statistical difference in corneal biomechanics between SMILE and FS-LASIK in corneal hysteresis [mean difference (MD), 0.20; 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.09, 0.49; P = .18] and corneal resistant factor (MD, 0.31; 95% CI: -0.09, 0.71; P = .13), A1 time (MD, -0.02; 95% CI: -0.11, 0.07; P = .66), A1 length (MD, 0.01; 95% CI: -0.01, 0.03; P = .42), A1 velocity (MD, 0.00; 95% CI: -0.01, 0.01; P = .85), A2 velocity (MD, -0.01; 95% CI: -0.11, 0.09; P = .86), HC time (MD, 0.12; 95% CI: -0.13, 0.38; P = .35), The stiffness parameter at first applanation (MD, -7.91; 95% CI: -17.96, 2.14; P = .12), The ratio between the deformation amplitude 2 mm away from apex and the apical deformation (MD, 0.01; 95% CI: -0.26, 0.27; P = .96). Conclusion:A comprehensive assessment of the parameters of ocular response analyzer and corvis ST showed that SMILE is not superior to LASIK in corneal biomechanics 3 months post-surgery.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Changes in Ocular Surface and Tear Inflammatory Mediators after Small-incision Lenticule Extraction and Femtosecond Laser-assisted Laser in Situ Keratomileusis
    Zhong, Xingwu
    Gao, Shaohui
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2014, 55 (13)
  • [22] Comparison of postoperative long-term stabilities of tear film and cornea after femtosecond small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Chen, Dafu
    Yu, Kunying
    Zhang, Xu
    Liao, Hongfei
    BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH-INDIA, 2017, 28 (15): : 6662 - 6666
  • [23] Vector analysis of astigmatic changes after small-incision lenticule extraction and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis
    Khalifa, Mounir A.
    Ghoneim, Ahmed M.
    Shaheen, Mohamed Shafik
    Pinero, David P.
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2017, 43 (06) : 819 - 824
  • [24] Early Changes in Ocular Surface and Tear Inflammatory Mediators after Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction and Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Laser In Situ Keratomileusis
    Gao, Shaohui
    Li, Saiqun
    Liu, Liangping
    Wang, Yong
    Ding, Hui
    Li, Lili
    Zhong, Xingwu
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (09):
  • [25] Corneal Sensation After Corneal Refractive Surgery with Small Incision Lenticule Extraction
    Demirok, Ahmet
    Ozgurhan, Engin Bilge
    Agca, Alper
    Kara, Necip
    Bozkurt, Ercument
    Cankaya, Kadir Ilker
    Yilmaz, Omer Faruk
    OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2013, 90 (10) : 1040 - 1047
  • [26] Intraocular pressure changes and corneal biomechanics after hyperopic small-incision lenticule extraction
    Fu, Dan
    Li, Meiyan
    Knorz, Michael C.
    Wei, Shengsheng
    Shang, Jianmin
    Zhou, Xingtao
    BMC OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [27] Intraocular pressure changes and corneal biomechanics after hyperopic small-incision lenticule extraction
    Dan Fu
    Meiyan Li
    Michael C. Knorz
    Shengsheng Wei
    Jianmin Shang
    Xingtao Zhou
    BMC Ophthalmology, 20
  • [28] Clinical outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction versus femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK for myopia: a Meta-analysis
    Huan Yan
    Li-Yan Gong
    Wei Huang
    Yan-Li Peng
    International Journal of Ophthalmology, 2017, 10 (09) : 1436 - 1445
  • [29] Clinical outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction versus femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK for myopia: a Meta-analysis
    Yan, Huan
    Gong, Li-Yan
    Huang, Wei
    Peng, Yan-Li
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2017, 10 (09) : 1436 - 1445
  • [30] Visual outcomes of early enhancement following small incision lenticule extraction versus laser in situ keratomileusis
    Soundarya, B.
    Sachdev, Gitansha Shreyas
    Ramamurthy, Shreyas
    Kumar, Shreesha K.
    Dandapani, Ramamurthy
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 71 (05) : 1845 - 1848