Corneal biomechanics after small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Chen, Songbai [1 ]
Ma, Hongjie [2 ]
Zhao, Congling [1 ]
机构
[1] Aier Huangpi Eye Hosp, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Zhengzhou Aier Eye Hosp, Zhengzhou, Henan, Peoples R China
关键词
corneal biomechanics; corvis ST (CST); femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK); ocular response analyzer (ORA); small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE); ASSISTED LASIK; MYOPIA; FLAP; CAP;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000034580
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background:Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) have been extensively studied as the main surgical methods for corneal refractive surgery. However, there is no consensus on whether SMILE is superior to FS-LASIK in corneal biomechanics. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis used the results of ocular response analyzer and corvis ST to explore whether SMILE is superior to FS-LASIK in corneal biomechanics. Methods:The literature was searched in PubMed, EMBASE, and Controlled Trials Register databases. The Cochrane Collaboration's "risk of bias" tool was used to evaluate the quality of the included randomized clinical trials, and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to evaluate the included non-randomized controlled trials. The results were analyzed using Revman 5.3. Results:Sixteen studies (3 randomized clinical trials and 13 non-randomized controlled trials) were included in this meta-analysis. There was no statistical difference in corneal biomechanics between SMILE and FS-LASIK in corneal hysteresis [mean difference (MD), 0.20; 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.09, 0.49; P = .18] and corneal resistant factor (MD, 0.31; 95% CI: -0.09, 0.71; P = .13), A1 time (MD, -0.02; 95% CI: -0.11, 0.07; P = .66), A1 length (MD, 0.01; 95% CI: -0.01, 0.03; P = .42), A1 velocity (MD, 0.00; 95% CI: -0.01, 0.01; P = .85), A2 velocity (MD, -0.01; 95% CI: -0.11, 0.09; P = .86), HC time (MD, 0.12; 95% CI: -0.13, 0.38; P = .35), The stiffness parameter at first applanation (MD, -7.91; 95% CI: -17.96, 2.14; P = .12), The ratio between the deformation amplitude 2 mm away from apex and the apical deformation (MD, 0.01; 95% CI: -0.26, 0.27; P = .96). Conclusion:A comprehensive assessment of the parameters of ocular response analyzer and corvis ST showed that SMILE is not superior to LASIK in corneal biomechanics 3 months post-surgery.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Small-incision lenticule extraction versus femtosecond lenticule extraction for myopic:a systematic review and Meta-analysis
    Jia-Song Wang
    Hua-Tao Xie
    Ye Jia
    Ming-Chang Zhang
    International Journal of Ophthalmology, 2017, (01) : 115 - 121
  • [2] Small-incision lenticule extraction versus femtosecond lenticule extraction for myopic: a systematic review and Meta-analysis
    Wang, Jia-Song
    Xie, Hua-Tao
    Jia, Ye
    Zhang, Ming-Chang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2017, 10 (01) : 115 - 121
  • [3] Fourier Analysis of Corneal Irregular Astigmatism After Small Incision Lenticule Extraction and Comparison to Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Laser In Situ Keratomileusis
    Sideroudi, Haris
    Sekundo, Walter
    Kozobolis, Vassilios
    Messerschmidt-Roth, Anke
    Lazaridis, Apostolos
    CORNEA, 2019, 38 (12) : 1536 - 1542
  • [4] Changes in corneal biomechanics during small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK)
    Cao, Kaiwei
    Liu, Lina
    Yu, Ting
    Chen, Feng
    Bai, Ji
    Liu, Ting
    LASERS IN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 35 (03) : 599 - 609
  • [5] The Correlation Analysis between Corneal Biomechanical Properties and the Surgically Induced Corneal High-Order Aberrations after Small Incision Lenticule Extraction and Femtosecond Laser In Situ Keratomileusis
    Wu, Wenjing
    Wang, Yan
    JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2015, 2015
  • [6] Corneal Clarity and Visual Outcomes after Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction and Comparison to Femtosecond Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis
    Lazaridis, Apostolos
    Droutsas, Konstantinos
    Sekundo, Walter
    Petrak, Michael
    Schulze, Stephan
    JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2017, 2017
  • [7] Changes in corneal biomechanics during small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK)
    Kaiwei Cao
    Lina Liu
    Ting Yu
    Feng Chen
    Ji Bai
    Ting Liu
    Lasers in Medical Science, 2020, 35 : 599 - 609
  • [8] Comparison of corneal biomechanics after microincision lenticule extraction and small incision lenticule extraction
    Wu, Zhiqing
    Wang, Yan
    Zhang, Jiamei
    Chan, Tommy C. Y.
    Ng, Alex L. K.
    Cheng, George P. M.
    Jhanji, Vishal
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2017, 101 (05) : 650 - 654
  • [9] Corneal biomechanical changes in eyes with small incision lenticule extraction and laser assisted in situ keratomileusis
    Osman, Ihab Mohamed
    Helaly, Hany Ahmed
    Abdalla, Moones
    Abou Shousha, Mohsen
    BMC OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2016, 16
  • [10] Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) and Laser in Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) Used to Treat Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
    Yao, Lin
    Zhang, Minghong
    Wang, Dianqiang
    Zhao, Qian
    Wang, Shouyan
    Bai, Haiqing
    SEMINARS IN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 38 (03) : 283 - 293