Impact of the rootstock genotype on the performance of grafted common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars

被引:6
|
作者
Vougeleka, Vasiliki [1 ]
Savvas, Dimitrios [2 ]
Ntatsi, Georgia [2 ]
Ellinas, Georgios [2 ]
Zacharis, Alexandros [2 ]
Iannetta, Pietro P. M. [3 ]
Mylona, Photini [4 ]
Saitanis, Costas J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Agr Univ Athens, Dept Crop Sci, Lab Ecol & Environm Sci, Athens 11855, Greece
[2] Agr Univ Athens, Dept Crop Sci, Lab Vegetable Prod, Athens 11855, Greece
[3] James Hutton Inst, Ecol Sci, Invergowrie, Dundee DD2 5DA, Scotland
[4] Inst Plant Breeding & Genet Resources, HAO DEMETER, Thermi 57001, Greece
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
BNF; Common bean; Grafting; Legume; Rhizobia; Rootstock; BIOLOGICAL NITROGEN-FIXATION; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; VIGNA-UNGUICULATA L; WATER-STRESS; YIELD; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; VEGETABLES; TOMATO; NODULATION; IMPROVE;
D O I
10.1016/j.scienta.2022.111821
中图分类号
S6 [园艺];
学科分类号
0902 ;
摘要
Grafting is an excellent tool to investigate shoot/root interactions involved in root nodulation by rhizobia and biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) in legumes of high economic and nutritional importance, such as common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Considering this, three landraces and one commercial cultivar of common bean were grafted onto eight different legume genotypes to identify possible rootstock x scion combinations that increase yield, and to study the impact of the root genotype on nitrogen fixation. The genotypes were three Greek landraces of Phaseolus vulgaris L. (namely 'Chandres Therines', 'Pyrgetos' and 'Tsaoulia'), and one commercial cultivar (cv. 'Helda'). These were grafted onto six different Greek landraces of Phaseolus vulgaris L., particularly 'Chandres', 'Papouda', 'Pastalia', 'Vanilla', 'Zargana Chryssoupolis' and 'Zargana Kavalas', one Phaseolus cocci-neus L. landrace originating from the Greek province Feneos, and one cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp) landrace originating from Arta, Greece. Grafting success was mainly determined by the rootstock genotype. The best rootstock/scion combination, attaining 100% success, was 'Tsaoulia' grafted onto 'Zargana Kavalas'. Moreover, the use of P. coccineus L. as rootstock enhanced appreciably the fresh pod yield by increasing the number of fresh pods. In contrast, cowpea was an incompatible rootstock for grafting P. vulgaris, as all plants grafted on it failed to survive. Most grafting combinations reduced the% of N derived from the atmosphere (% Ndfa) through BNF. Despite the decreased%Ndfa, some rootstocks increased the biologically fixed N per culti-vated area unit due to higher total biomass production, which indicates involvement of mechanisms causing rootstock/scion interactions.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Screening for heat tolerance in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) lines and cultivars using JIP-test
    Stefanov, Detelin
    Petkova, Valentina
    Denev, Iliya D.
    SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE, 2011, 128 (01) : 1 - 6
  • [22] Intercropping and Rhizobium Inoculation Affected Microclimate and Performance of Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Varieties
    Shumet, Shemeles Tesfaye
    Ayalew, Tewodros
    Roro, Amsalu Gobena
    Beshir, Hussien Mohammed
    SCIENTIFICA, 2022, 2022
  • [23] Resistance sources and reactions of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars in Turkey to anthracnose disease
    Palacioglu, Gulsum
    Ozer, Goksel
    Yeken, Mehmet Zahit
    Ciftci, Vahdettin
    Bayraktar, Harun
    GENETIC RESOURCES AND CROP EVOLUTION, 2021, 68 (08) : 3373 - 3381
  • [24] Physiological analysis of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars uncovers characteristics related to terminal drought resistance
    Rosales, Miguel A.
    Ocampo, Edilia
    Rodriguez-Velentin, Rocio
    Olvera-Carrillo, Yadira
    Acosta-Gallegos, Jorge
    Covarrubias, Alejandra A.
    PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY, 2012, 56 : 24 - 34
  • [25] SNP marker diversity in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)
    Andrés J. Cortés
    Martha C. Chavarro
    Matthew W. Blair
    Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2011, 123
  • [26] Microsatellite marker diversity in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)
    M. W. Blair
    M. C. Giraldo
    H. F. Buendía
    E. Tovar
    M. C. Duque
    S. E. Beebe
    Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2006, 113 : 100 - 109
  • [27] Breeding for bean fly resistance in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.): a review
    Nkhata, Wilson
    Shimelis, Hussein
    Melis, Rob
    Chirwa, Rowland
    Mzengeza, Tenyson
    ACTA AGRICULTURAE SCANDINAVICA SECTION B-SOIL AND PLANT SCIENCE, 2019, 69 (03) : 275 - 285
  • [28] Efficiency of Indigenous Soil Rhizobia on Growth Performance of the Common Bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.)
    Mekonnen, Mulugeta
    Kebede, Ameha
    Egigu, Meseret Chimdessa
    Muthuswamy, Manikandan
    MALAYSIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 2024, 28 : 53 - 62
  • [29] Response to selection for improved nitrogen fixation in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)
    Farid, Mehdi
    Earl, Hugh J.
    Pauls, K. Peter
    Navabi, Alireza
    EUPHYTICA, 2017, 213 (04)
  • [30] Screening of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars against root-lesion nematode species
    Sogut, Mehmet Ali
    Goze, Fatma Gul
    Onal, Tufan
    Devran, Zubeyir
    Tonguc, Muhammet
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY, 2014, 38 (04) : 455 - 461