Impact of the rootstock genotype on the performance of grafted common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars

被引:6
|
作者
Vougeleka, Vasiliki [1 ]
Savvas, Dimitrios [2 ]
Ntatsi, Georgia [2 ]
Ellinas, Georgios [2 ]
Zacharis, Alexandros [2 ]
Iannetta, Pietro P. M. [3 ]
Mylona, Photini [4 ]
Saitanis, Costas J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Agr Univ Athens, Dept Crop Sci, Lab Ecol & Environm Sci, Athens 11855, Greece
[2] Agr Univ Athens, Dept Crop Sci, Lab Vegetable Prod, Athens 11855, Greece
[3] James Hutton Inst, Ecol Sci, Invergowrie, Dundee DD2 5DA, Scotland
[4] Inst Plant Breeding & Genet Resources, HAO DEMETER, Thermi 57001, Greece
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
BNF; Common bean; Grafting; Legume; Rhizobia; Rootstock; BIOLOGICAL NITROGEN-FIXATION; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; VIGNA-UNGUICULATA L; WATER-STRESS; YIELD; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; VEGETABLES; TOMATO; NODULATION; IMPROVE;
D O I
10.1016/j.scienta.2022.111821
中图分类号
S6 [园艺];
学科分类号
0902 ;
摘要
Grafting is an excellent tool to investigate shoot/root interactions involved in root nodulation by rhizobia and biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) in legumes of high economic and nutritional importance, such as common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Considering this, three landraces and one commercial cultivar of common bean were grafted onto eight different legume genotypes to identify possible rootstock x scion combinations that increase yield, and to study the impact of the root genotype on nitrogen fixation. The genotypes were three Greek landraces of Phaseolus vulgaris L. (namely 'Chandres Therines', 'Pyrgetos' and 'Tsaoulia'), and one commercial cultivar (cv. 'Helda'). These were grafted onto six different Greek landraces of Phaseolus vulgaris L., particularly 'Chandres', 'Papouda', 'Pastalia', 'Vanilla', 'Zargana Chryssoupolis' and 'Zargana Kavalas', one Phaseolus cocci-neus L. landrace originating from the Greek province Feneos, and one cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp) landrace originating from Arta, Greece. Grafting success was mainly determined by the rootstock genotype. The best rootstock/scion combination, attaining 100% success, was 'Tsaoulia' grafted onto 'Zargana Kavalas'. Moreover, the use of P. coccineus L. as rootstock enhanced appreciably the fresh pod yield by increasing the number of fresh pods. In contrast, cowpea was an incompatible rootstock for grafting P. vulgaris, as all plants grafted on it failed to survive. Most grafting combinations reduced the% of N derived from the atmosphere (% Ndfa) through BNF. Despite the decreased%Ndfa, some rootstocks increased the biologically fixed N per culti-vated area unit due to higher total biomass production, which indicates involvement of mechanisms causing rootstock/scion interactions.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Development of new cultivars of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris, L.)
    Ranalli, P
    Parisi, B
    Govoni, F
    Del Re, P
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE XXV INTERNATIONAL HORTICULTURAL CONGRESS, PT 12: APPLICATION OF BIOTECHNOLOGY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND BREEDING, GENERAL BREEDING, AND EVALUATION OF TEMPERATE ZONE FRUITS FOR THE TROPICS AND SUBTROPICS, 2000, (522): : 181 - 185
  • [2] MOLECULAR DIVERSITY OF COMMON BEAN (PHASEOLUS VULGARIS L.) CULTIVARS
    Filimon, Raluca
    Nechifor, B.
    Szilagyi, Lizica
    SCIENTIFIC PAPERS-SERIES A-AGRONOMY, 2011, 54 : 344 - 349
  • [3] Nodule formation ability of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars
    Milev, GM
    Genchev, DD
    FIRST BALKAN SYMPOSIUM ON VEGETABLES AND POTATOES, VOLS. I & II, 1997, 1 (462): : 857 - 862
  • [4] Genotype by environment interaction and performance stability of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars grown in Dawuro zone, Southwestern Ethiopia
    Daemo, Berhanu Bilate
    OPEN AGRICULTURE, 2024, 9 (01):
  • [5] Diallel analysis of the combining ability of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars
    Barelli, MAA
    Gonçalves-Vidigal, MC
    do Amaral, AT
    Vidigal, PS
    Scapim, CA
    BRAZILIAN ARCHIVES OF BIOLOGY AND TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 43 (04): : 409 - 414
  • [6] Gibberellic Acid Sensitivity among Common Bean Cultivars (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)
    Pavlista, Alexander D.
    Santra, Dipak K.
    Schild, James A.
    Hergert, Gary W.
    HORTSCIENCE, 2012, 47 (05) : 637 - 642
  • [7] Regionalization of the common bean cultivars (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in the Villa Clara province
    Martinez Medina, Silvio de Jesus
    Gil Diaz, Victor Daniel
    Rodriguez Valdes, Gudelia
    Quintero Fernandez, Edilio
    Colas Sanchez, Ariany
    CENTRO AGRICOLA, 2020, 47 (04): : 5 - 11
  • [8] DIFFERENCES IN FYTOCHEMICALS CONTENT IN COLOURED CULTIVARS OF COMMON BEAN (PHASEOLUS VULGARIS L.)
    Tirdil'ova, Ivana
    Vollmannova, Alena
    Janco, Ivona
    Snirc, Marek
    JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY BIOTECHNOLOGY AND FOOD SCIENCES, 2020, 9 (06): : 1187 - 1190
  • [9] The Paleobiolinguistics of the Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)
    Brown, Cecil H.
    Clement, Charles R.
    Epps, Patience
    Luedeling, Eike
    Wichmann, Soren
    ETHNOBIOLOGY LETTERS, 2014, 5 : 104 - 115
  • [10] Impact of soil moisture on common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) phytochemicals
    Denise Herrera, Mayra
    Reynoso-Camacho, Rosalia
    Melero-Meraz, Valentin
    Guzman-Maldonado, Salvador H.
    Acosta-Gallegos, Jorge A.
    JOURNAL OF FOOD COMPOSITION AND ANALYSIS, 2021, 99