Asians Don't Ask? Relational Concerns, Negotiation Propensity, and Starting Salaries

被引:18
作者
Lu, Jackson G. [1 ]
机构
[1] MIT, Sloan Sch Management, 100 Main St, Cambridge, MA 02142 USA
关键词
Bamboo Ceiling; culture; negotiation; human resources; salary; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; INITIATE NEGOTIATIONS; EAST ASIANS; CONFLICT; WOMEN; SELF; FACE; COMPENSATION; CONSEQUENCES; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1037/apl0001017
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
In the U.S., Asians are commonly viewed as the "model minority" because of their economic prosperity. We challenge this rosy view by revealing that certain Asian groups may be susceptible to lower starting salaries. In Study 1, we analyzed 19 class years of MBAs who accepted full-time job offers in the U.S. At first glance, Asians appeared to have starting salaries similarly high as Whites'. However, a striking gap emerged once we distinguished between East Asians (e.g., ethnic Chinese), Southeast Asians (e.g., ethnic Vietnamese), and South Asians (e.g., ethnic Indians): Whereas South Asians started with the highest salaries of all ethnicities, East/Southeast Asians were near the bottom. This salary gap was mediated by East/Southeast Asians' propensity to not negotiate due to higher relational concerns. Importantly, negotiation predicted higher salary for each of the three groups (East/Southeast Asians, South Asians, and Whites). In further support of negotiation propensity as a mechanism, we identified industry as a boundary condition: The salary gap was not observed for consulting jobs, where MBA starting salaries are typically standard and non-negotiable. The non-consulting salary gap between East/Southeast and South Asians was estimated to be $4,002/year, a sizable difference that can compound over career life. Study 2 found similar results in a non-MBA sample while further accounting for individuals' bargaining power (e.g., the number of alternative offers, the highest alternative offer). In revealing the differences between East/Southeast and South Asians, this research moves beyond the predominant West-versus-East paradigm and reveals a more complex reality underneath Asian prosperity.
引用
收藏
页码:273 / 290
页数:18
相关论文
共 62 条
[11]   Prescriptive Stereotypes and Workplace Consequences for East Asians in North America [J].
Berdahl, Jennifer L. ;
Min, Ji-A .
CULTURAL DIVERSITY & ETHNIC MINORITY PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 18 (02) :141-152
[12]   Social incentives for gender differences in the propensity to initiate negotiations: Sometimes it does hurt to ask [J].
Bowles, Hannah Riley ;
Babcock, Linda ;
Lai, Lei .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2007, 103 (01) :84-103
[13]   How Can Women Escape the Compensation Negotiation Dilemma? Relational Accounts Are One Answer [J].
Bowles, Hannah Riley ;
Babcock, Linda .
PSYCHOLOGY OF WOMEN QUARTERLY, 2013, 37 (01) :80-96
[14]   Intercultural challenges in managing workplace conflict - a call for research [J].
Brett, Jeanne .
CROSS CULTURAL & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 2018, 25 (01) :32-52
[15]   Online panels in social science research: Expanding sampling methods beyond Mechanical Turk [J].
Chandler, Jesse ;
Rosenzweig, Cheskie ;
Moss, Aaron J. ;
Robinson, Jonathan ;
Litman, Leib .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2019, 51 (05) :2022-2038
[16]   Penalized for Personality: A Case Study of Asian-Origin Disadvantage at the Point of Hire [J].
Chavez, Koji .
SOCIOLOGY OF RACE AND ETHNICITY, 2021, 7 (02) :226-246
[17]   Bringing National Culture to the Table: Making a Difference with Cross-cultural Differences and Perspectives [J].
Chen, Ya-Ru ;
Leung, Kwok ;
Chen, Chao C. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT ANNALS, 2009, 3 :217-249
[18]  
Cheng C., 1997, Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, V33, P277
[19]   What do people value when they negotiate? Mapping the domain of subjective value in negotiation [J].
Curhan, Jared R. ;
Elfenbein, Hillary Anger ;
Heng Xu .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 91 (03) :493-512
[20]   An expectancy model of Chinese-American differences in conflict-avoiding [J].
Friedman, R ;
Chi, SC ;
Liu, LA .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STUDIES, 2006, 37 (01) :76-91