Postnatal phenobarbital for the prevention of intraventricular haemorrhage in preterm infants

被引:1
作者
Romantsik, Olga [1 ]
Smit, Elisa [2 ,3 ]
Odd, David E. [2 ,3 ]
Bruschettini, Matteo [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Skane Univ Hosp, Paediat, Dept Clin Sci Lund, Lund, Sweden
[2] Univ Hosp Wales, Neonatal Intens Care Unit, Cardiff & Vale Univ Hlth Board, Cardiff, Wales
[3] Cardiff Univ, Cardiff, Wales
[4] Lund Univ, Skane Univ Hosp, Cochrane Sweden, Lund, Sweden
来源
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS | 2023年 / 03期
关键词
Cerebral Hemorrhage [prevention & control; Cerebral Ventricles; Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists [therapeutic use; Infant; Premature; Diseases; prevention; control; Phenobarbital [therapeutic use; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Humans; Newborn; CEREBRAL-BLOOD-FLOW; BIRTH-WEIGHT INFANTS; BEAGLE PUPPY MODEL; INDUCED CELL-DEATH; NEURODEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOMES; PERIVENTRICULAR HEMORRHAGE; RESPIRATORY-DISTRESS; MOTOR ABNORMALITIES; ANTIEPILEPTIC DRUGS; PATHOGENESIS;
D O I
10.1002/14651858.CD001691.pub4
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH) is a major complication of preterm birth. Large haemorrhages are associated with a high risk of disability and hydrocephalus. Instability of blood pressure and cerebral blood in the newborn flow are postulated as causative factors. Another mechanism may involve reperfusion damage from oxygen free radicals. It has been suggested that phenobarbital stabilises blood pressure and may protect against free radicals. This is an update of a review first published in 2001 and updated in 2007 and 2013. Objectives To assess the benefits and harms of the postnatal administration of phenobarbital in preterm infants at risk of developing IVH compared to control (i.e. no intervention or placebo). Search methods We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Medline, Embase, CINAHL and clinical trial registries in January 2022. A new, more sensitive search strategy was developed, and searches were conducted without date limits. Selection criteria We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs in which phenobarbital was given within the first 24 hours of life to preterm infants identified as being at risk of IVH because of gestational age below 34 weeks, birth weight below 1500 g or respiratory failure. Phenobarbital was compared to no intervention or placebo. We excluded infants with serious congenital malformations. Data collection and analysis We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were all grades of IVH and severe IVH (i.e. grade III and IV); secondary outcomes were ventricular dilation or hydrocephalus, hypotension, pneumothorax, hypercapnia, acidosis, mechanical ventilation, neurodevelopmental impairment and death. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence for each outcome. Main results We included 10 RCTs (792 infants). The evidence suggests that phenobarbital results in little to no difference in the incidence of IVH of any grade compared with control (risk ratio (RR) 1.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84 to 1.19; risk difference (RD) 0.00, 95% CI -0.06 to 0.07; I-2 for RD = 65%; 10 RCTs, 792 participants; low certainty evidence) and in severe IVH (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.21; 10 RCTs, 792 participants; low certainty evidence). The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of phenobarbital on posthaemorrhagic ventricular dilation or hydrocephalus (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.31 to 1.26; 4 RCTs, 271 participants; very low certainty evidence), mild neurodevelopmental impairment (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.15 to 2.17; 1RCT, 101 participants; very low certainty evidence), and severe neurodevelopmental impairment (RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.44 to 2.82; 2 RCTs, 153 participants; very low certainty evidence). Phenobarbital may result in little to no difference in death before discharge (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.21; 9 RCTs, 740 participants; low certainty evidence) and mortality during study period (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.33; 10 RCTs, 792 participants; low certainty evidence) compared with control. We identified no ongoing trials. Authors' conclusions The evidence suggests that phenobarbital results in little to no difference in the incidence of IVH (any grade or severe) compared with control (i.e. no intervention or placebo). The evidence is very uncertain about the effects of phenobarbital on ventricular dilation or hydrocephalus and on neurodevelopmental impairment. The evidence suggests that phenobarbital results in little to no difference in death before discharge and all deaths during the study period compared with control. Since 1993, no randomised studies have been published on phenobarbital for the prevention of IVH in preterm infants, and no trials are ongoing. The effects of postnatal phenobarbital might be assessed in infants with both neonatal seizures and IVH, in both randomised and observational studies. The assessment of benefits and harms should include long-term outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:57
相关论文
共 74 条
  • [1] Psychological therapies for sickle cell disease and pain
    Anie, Kofi A.
    Green, John
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2012, (02):
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2020, Review Manager (RevMan)
  • [3] PHENOBARBITONE PROPHYLAXIS OF INTRAVENTRICULAR HEMORRHAGE
    ANWAR, M
    KADAM, S
    HIATT, IM
    HEGYI, T
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD, 1986, 61 (02) : 196 - 197
  • [4] Early deterioration of cerebrospinal fluid dynamics in a neonatal piglet model of intraventricular hemorrhage and posthemorrhagic ventricular dilation Laboratory investigation
    Aquilina, Kristian
    Chakkarapani, Ela
    Thoresen, Marianne
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-PEDIATRICS, 2012, 10 (06) : 529 - 537
  • [5] Pathogenesis and Prevention of Intraventricular Hemorrhage
    Ballabh, Praveen
    [J]. CLINICS IN PERINATOLOGY, 2014, 41 (01) : 47 - +
  • [6] BEDARD MP, 1984, PEDIATRICS, V73, P435
  • [7] Antiepileptic drugs and apoptotic neurodegeneration in the developing brain
    Bittigau, P
    Sifringer, M
    Genz, K
    Reith, E
    Pospischil, D
    Govindarajalu, S
    Dzietko, M
    Pesditschek, S
    Mai, I
    Dikranian, K
    Olney, JW
    Ikonomidou, C
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2002, 99 (23) : 15089 - 15094
  • [8] Meta-Analysis and Subgroups
    Borenstein, Michael
    Higgins, Julian P. T.
    [J]. PREVENTION SCIENCE, 2013, 14 (02) : 134 - 143
  • [9] Chen H, 2008, Journal of Clinical Pediatrics, V26, P986
  • [10] Assessment of Brain Injury and Brain Volumes after Posthemorrhagic Ventricular Dilatation: A Nested Substudy of the Randomized Controlled ELVIS Trial
    Cizmeci, Mehmet N.
    Khalili, Nadieh
    Claessens, Nathalie H. P.
    Groenendaal, Floris
    Liem, Kian D.
    Heep, Axel
    Benavente-Fernandez, Isabel
    van Straaten, Henrica L. M.
    van Wezel-Meijler, Gerda
    Steggerda, Sylke J.
    Dudink, Jeroen
    Isgum, Ivana
    Whitelaw, Andrew
    Benders, Manon J. N. L.
    de Vries, Linda S.
    Han, K.
    Woerdeman, P.
    ter Horst, H. J.
    Dijkman, K. P.
    Ley, D.
    Fellman, V
    de Haan, T. R.
    Brouwer, A. J.
    van't Verlaat, E.
    Govaert, P.
    Smit, B. J.
    Agut Quijano, T.
    Barcik, U.
    Mathur, A.
    Graca, A. M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2019, 208 : 191 - +