Quality Indicators to Evaluate Essential Newborn Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries

BACKGROUND Strategies to improve neonatal outcomes rely on accurate collection and analyses of quality indicators. Most low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) fail to monitor facility-level indicators, partly because recommended and consistently defined indicators for essential newborn care (ENC) do not exist. This gap prompted our development of an annotated directory of quality indicators.METHODS We used a mixed method study design. In phase 1, we selected potential indicators by reviewing existing literature. An overall rating was assigned based on subscores for scientific evidence, importance, and usability. We used a modified Delphi technique for consensus-based approval from American Academy of Pediatrics Helping Babies Survive Planning Group members (phase 2) and secondarily surveyed international partners with expertise in ENC, LMIC clinical environments, and indicator development (phase 3). We generated the final directory with guidelines for site-specific indicator selection (phase 4).RESULTS We identified 51 indicators during phase 1. Following Delphi sessions and secondary review, we added 5 indicators and rejected 7. We categorized the 49 indicators meeting inclusion criteria into 3 domains: 17 outcome, 21 process, and 11 educational. Among those, we recommend 30 for use, meaning indicators should be selected preferentially when appropriate; we recommend 9 for selective use primarily because of data collection challenges and 10 for use with reservation because of scientific evidence or usability limitations.CONCLUSIONS We developed this open-access indicator directory with input from ENC experts to enable appraisal of care provision, track progress toward improvement goals, and provide a standard for benchmarking care delivery among LMICs.