Techno-economic assessment of integrated NH3-power co-production with CCS and energy storage in an LNG regasification terminal

被引:2
作者
del Pozo, Carlos Arnaiz [1 ,3 ]
Cloete, Schalk [2 ]
Alvaro, Angel Jimenez [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Madrid, Madrid, Spain
[2] SINTEF Ind, Trondheim, Norway
[3] Univ Politecn Madrid, Calle Jose Gutierrez Abascal, Madrid 28006, Spain
关键词
ammonia; carbon capture & storage; power generation; energy storage; liquefied natural gas; techno-economic assessment; LIQUEFIED NATURAL-GAS; CRYOGENIC AIR SEPARATION; HYDROGEN-PRODUCTION; AMMONIA-SYNTHESIS; OPTIMIZATION; MEMBRANES; REACTORS; DESIGN; UNIT;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122381
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Energy efficiency and carbon capture and storage (CCS) are two key levers to attain global warming targets. Integration of various industrial and energy processes as well as complementary use of fuels with low carbon intensity such as natural gas with renewable sources will enable to mitigate environmental impacts in a cost competitive manner. This study proposes one such opportunity through integration of LNG cold exergy utilization for liquid N-2 energy storage during regasification coupled to a novel NH3-electricity co-production scheme with CCS. A techno-economic benchmarking between standalone NH3 production process with net electricity imports (Case A), an integrated co-production solution (Case B) and non-integrated co-production plant with a standard combined cycle for power generation (Case C) is performed. Base economic assumptions are a natural gas price of 6.5 <euro>/ton, CO2 tax of 100 <euro>/ton, NH3 selling price of 400 <euro>/ton and electricity average price of 80 <euro>/MWh. At varying power generation capacity factors CFEl ranging from 30 to 50%, the electricity price premium required by the co-production schemes to break even with Case A is 2.5-9.9 <euro>/MWh lower for Case B compared to Case C, with a premium as low as 12.9 <euro>/MWh at 50% CFEl for the former when 2 days' worth of energy storage capacity is constructed. Thus, integration improves economic competitiveness for short storage times, applicable to regions with reliable year-round solar resources. However, the competitive advantage disappears when storage periods longer than one week are considered, such as power systems with high wind shares or seasonal solar availability.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A techno-economic analysis of biodiesel biorefineries: Assessment of integrated designs for the co-production of fuels and chemicals
    Vlysidis, Anestis
    Binns, Michael
    Webb, Cohn
    Theodoropoulos, Constantinos
    ENERGY, 2011, 36 (08) : 4671 - 4683
  • [2] Techno-economic assessment of concentrated solar power technologies integrated with thermal energy storage system for green hydrogen production
    Soni, Neelesh
    Reddy, K. S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2024, 72 : 1184 - 1203
  • [3] Biomass direct chemical looping for hydrogen and power co-production: Process configuration, simulation, thermal integration and techno-economic assessment
    Cormos, Calin-Cristian
    FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 137 : 16 - 23
  • [4] Techno-Economic Assessment of Residential Heat Pump Integrated with Thermal Energy Storage
    Sultan, Sara
    Hirschey, Jason
    Kumar, Navin
    Cui, Borui
    Liu, Xiaobing
    LaClair, Tim J.
    Gluesenkamp, Kyle R.
    ENERGIES, 2023, 16 (10)
  • [5] Techno-economic assessment of a subsea energy storage technology for power balancing services
    Hahn, Henning
    Hau, Daniel
    Dick, Christian
    Puchta, Matthias
    ENERGY, 2017, 133 : 121 - 127
  • [6] Techno-economic assessment for a pumped thermal energy storage integrated with open cycle gas turbine and chemical looping technology
    Bahzad, Husain
    Fennell, Paul
    Shah, Nilay
    Hallett, Jason
    Ali, Naser
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 255
  • [7] Integrated biorefinery for bioethanol and succinic acid co-production from bread waste: Techno-economic feasibility and life cycle assessment
    Hafyan, Rendra Hakim
    Mohanarajan, Jasmithaa
    Uppal, Manaal
    Kumar, Vinod
    Narisetty, Vivek
    Maity, Sunil K.
    Sadhukhan, Jhuma
    Gadkari, Siddharth
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 301
  • [8] Techno-economic assessment of different small-scale electrochemical NH3 production plants
    Izelaar, Boaz
    Ramdin, Mahinder
    Vlierboom, Alexander
    Perez-Fortes, Mar
    van der Slikke, Deanne
    Sajeev Kumar, Asvin
    de Jong, Wiebren
    Mulder, Fokko M.
    Kortlever, Ruud
    ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2024, 17 (21) : 7983 - 7998
  • [9] A techno-economic assessment of large scale wind-hydrogen production with energy storage in Western Canada
    Olateju, Babatunde
    Kumar, Amit
    Secanell, Marc
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2016, 41 (21) : 8755 - 8776
  • [10] Techno-economic assessment of hydrogen integrated into electrical/ thermal energy storage in PV plus Wind system devoting to high reliability
    Liu, Tianye
    Yang, Zhen
    Duan, Yuanyuan
    Hu, Shuozhuo
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 268