RT-qPCR is helpful to distinguish the clinicopathological features of HER2 immunohistochemistry 0 and 1+

被引:3
作者
Yue, Meng [1 ]
Wu, Si [1 ]
Wang, Xinran [1 ]
Cai, Lijing [1 ]
Wang, Xiaoxiao [1 ]
Yang, Huichai [1 ]
Liu, Yueping [1 ]
机构
[1] Hebei Med Univ, Dept Pathol, Hosp 4, 12 Jiankang Rd, Shijiazhuang 050011, Hebei, Peoples R China
关键词
Breast cancer; HER2-low; Ultra-low; RT-qPCR; mRNA;
D O I
10.1016/j.prp.2023.154532
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
The most commonly applied techniques to assess human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression in breast cancer are immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). HER2 detection by reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) can provide standardized, objective and automated assessment and reflect the HER2 expression continuity. Currently, there is lack of sufficient evidence to validate whether RT-qPCR technique is more appropriate for the detection of HER2 low expression, especially ultra-low expression. Here, we primarily utilized RT-qPCR to differentiate HER2 true negative, ultralow and 1 +, and compare the clinicopathological features and prognosis between RT-qPCR and IHC. 136 breast cancer cases with HER2 0 or 1 + were collected, also included 21 cases with HER2 2 + FISH negative as well as 25 cases with HER2 positive during the same period for comparative analysis. Compared the mRNA levels based on IHC/FISH scores. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was utilized to determine the threshold for reclassification, and the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis differences among IHC true negative, ultra-low and 1 + after re-classification by RT-qPCR were analyzed. The mRNA level significantly differed between the IHC 0 and 1 + groups (p < 0.001). The IHC 0 group was further divided into true negative and ultralow, there was no statistically significant difference in mRNA levels between true negative and ultra-low groups, while the difference between ultra-low and 1 + mRNA levels was statistically significant (p < 0.001). After reclassification of IHC true negative, ultra-low and 1 + by RT-qPCR, there were statistically significant differences in histological grade, ER, PR and TILs expression. There was no significant difference between DFS and OS in the two classification methods. RT-qPCR classification aids in distinguishing clinicopathological characteristics and can serve as a supplementary technique for detecting HER2-low by IHC.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [31] Analysis of clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors of early-stage human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low breast cancer: Compared with HER2-0 breast cancer
    Wu, Qian
    Yang, Fan
    Liu, Yinhua
    Zhang, Hong
    Zhang, Shuang
    Xin, Ling
    Xu, Ling
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (19): : 19560 - 19575
  • [32] The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Accurate Interpretation of HER2 Immunohistochemical Scores 0 and 1+in Breast Cancer
    Wu, Si
    Yue, Meng
    Zhang, Jun
    Li, Xiaoxian
    Li, Zaibo
    Zhang, Huina
    Wang, Xinran
    Han, Xiao
    Cai, Lijing
    Shang, Jiuyan
    Jia, Zhanli
    Wang, Xiaoxiao
    Li, Jinze
    Liu, Yueping
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2023, 36 (03)
  • [33] Differential Expression and Clinicopathological Significance of HER2, Indoleamine 2,3-Dioxygenase and PD-L1 in Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder
    Kim, Donghyun
    Kim, Jin Man
    Kim, Jun-Sang
    Kim, Sup
    Kim, Kyung-Hee
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (05)
  • [34] Adjuvant therapy for HER2 positive pT1a-b pN0 breast cancer A single center cohort study
    Yang, Xuan
    Qu, Chong Xiao
    MEDICINE, 2022, 101 (25) : E29371
  • [35] Does HER2 status influence locoregional failure rates in breast cancer patients treated with mastectomy for pT1-2pN0 disease?
    Kwan, W.
    Al-Tourah, A. J.
    Speers, C.
    Woods, R.
    Kennecke, H.
    Olivotto, I. A.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2010, 21 (05) : 988 - 993
  • [36] Clinical significance of HER2 status in T1bN0 breast cancer: a nationwide study from the Korean Breast Cancer Society
    Kang, Young-Joon
    Oh, Se Jeong
    Choi, Hoon
    Cho, Shijin
    Shin, Chang-Hyun
    Kim, Chaiwon
    Woo, Joohyun
    Lee, JungSun
    Park, Heung Kyu
    Lee, Han-Byoel
    Noh, Woo Chul
    Kim, Yong-Seok
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2021, 186 (01) : 125 - 134
  • [37] Clinical significance of HER2 status in T1bN0 breast cancer: a nationwide study from the Korean Breast Cancer Society
    Young-Joon Kang
    Se Jeong Oh
    Hoon Choi
    Shijin Cho
    Chang-Hyun Shin
    Chaiwon Kim
    Joohyun Woo
    JungSun Lee
    Heung Kyu Park
    Han-Byoel Lee
    Woo Chul Noh
    Yong-Seok Kim
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2021, 186 : 125 - 134
  • [38] Technical validation of an RT-qPCR in vitro diagnostic test system for the determination of breast cancer molecular subtypes by quantification of ERBB2, ESR1, PGR and MKI67 mRNA levels from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded breast tumor specimens
    Mark Laible
    Kornelia Schlombs
    Katharina Kaiser
    Elke Veltrup
    Stefanie Herlein
    Sotiris Lakis
    Robert Stöhr
    Sebastian Eidt
    Arndt Hartmann
    Ralph M. Wirtz
    Ugur Sahin
    BMC Cancer, 16
  • [39] Technical validation of an RT-qPCR in vitro diagnostic test system for the determination of breast cancer molecular subtypes by quantification of ERBB2, ESR1, PGR and MKI67 mRNA levels from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded breast tumor specimens
    Laible, Mark
    Schlombs, Kornelia
    Kaiser, Katharina
    Veltrup, Elke
    Herlein, Stefanie
    Lakis, Sotiris
    Stoehr, Robert
    Eidt, Sebastian
    Hartmann, Arndt
    Wirtz, Ralph M.
    Sahin, Ugur
    BMC CANCER, 2016, 16
  • [40] Prognostic impact of the inclusion of uPA/PAI-1 for adjuvant treatment decision-making in ER+/Her2− pN0 early breast cancers
    Marie Viala
    Marie Alexandre
    Simon Thezenas
    Pierre-Jean Lamy
    Aurélie Maran-Gonzalez
    Marian Gutowski
    Pierre-Emmanuel Colombo
    Gilles Romieu
    William Jacot
    Severine Guiu
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2017, 165 : 611 - 621