Generation of double knockout cattle via CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein (RNP) electroporation

被引:10
作者
Gim, Gyeong-Min [1 ,2 ]
Eom, Kyeong-Hyeon [1 ,2 ]
Kwon, Dong-Hyeok [1 ]
Jung, Dae-Jin [3 ]
Kim, Dae-Hyun [3 ]
Yi, Jun-Koo [3 ]
Ha, Jae-Jung [3 ]
Lee, Ji-Hyun [2 ]
Lee, Seong-Beom [2 ]
Son, Woo-Jae [2 ]
Yum, Soo-Young [2 ]
Lee, Won-Wu [2 ]
Jang, Goo [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Res Inst Vet Sci, Lab Theriogenol & Biotechnol, Dept Vet Clin Sci,Coll Vet Med, Seoul, South Korea
[2] LARTBio Co Ltd, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Gyeongsangbukdo Livestock Res Inst, Yeongju, South Korea
[4] Seoul Natl Univ, Comparat Med Dis Res Ctr, Seoul, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Beta-lactoglobulin; Cattle; CRISPR-Cas9; Electroporation; Knockout; MSTN; PRNP;
D O I
10.1186/s40104-023-00902-8
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
BackgroundGenome editing has been considered as powerful tool in agricultural fields. However, genome editing progress in cattle has not been fast as in other mammal species, for some disadvantages including long gestational periods, single pregnancy, and high raising cost. Furthermore, technically demanding methods such as microinjection and somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) are needed for gene editing in cattle. In this point of view, electroporation in embryos has been risen as an alternative.ResultsFirst, editing efficiency of our electroporation methods were tested for embryos. Presence of mutation on embryo was confirmed by T7E1 assay. With first combination, mutation rates for MSTN and PRNP were 57.6% & PLUSMN; 13.7% and 54.6% & PLUSMN; 13.5%, respectively. In case of MSTN/BLG, mutation rates were 83.9% & PLUSMN; 23.6% for MSTN, 84.5% & PLUSMN; 18.0% for BLG. Afterwards, the double-KO embryos were transferred to surrogates and mutation rate was identified in resultant calves by targeted deep sequencing. Thirteen recipients were transferred for MSTN/PRNP, 4 calves were delivered, and one calf underwent an induction for double KO. Ten surrogates were given double-KO embryos for MSTN/BLG, and four of the six calves that were born had mutations in both genes.ConclusionsThese data demonstrated that production of genome edited cattle via electroporation of RNP could be effectively applied. Finally, MSTN and PRNP from beef cattle and MSTN and BLG from dairy cattle have been born and they will be valuable resources for future precision breeding.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Generation of a multiplex mutagenesis population via pooled CRISPR-Cas9 in soya bean
    Bai, Mengyan
    Yuan, Juehui
    Kuang, Huaqin
    Gong, Pingping
    Li, Suning
    Zhang, Zhihui
    Liu, Bo
    Sun, Jiafeng
    Yang, Maoxiang
    Yang, Lan
    Wang, Dong
    Song, Shikui
    Guan, Yuefeng
    [J]. PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGY JOURNAL, 2020, 18 (03) : 721 - 731
  • [22] Generation and characterization of a novel CYP3A1/2 double knockout rat model using CRISPR-Cas9 system
    WANG Xin
    LU Jian
    SHAO Yan-jiao
    QIN Xuan
    LIU Dao-zhi
    CHEN Ang
    LI Da-li
    LIU Ming-yao
    [J]. 中国药理学与毒理学杂志, 2016, (10) : 1048 - 1048
  • [23] Efficient genome editing using CRISPR-Cas9 RNP delivery into cabbage protoplasts via electro-transfection
    Lee, Myoung Hui
    Lee, Jiyoung
    Choi, Seung A.
    Kim, Ye-Sol
    Koo, Okjae
    Choi, Seung Hee
    Ahn, Woo Seok
    Jie, Eun Yee
    Kim, Suk Weon
    [J]. PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGY REPORTS, 2020, 14 (06) : 695 - 702
  • [24] Editing of the ethylene biosynthesis gene in carnation using CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complex
    Adedeji, Oluwaseun Suleimon
    Naing, Aung Htay
    Kang, Hyunhee
    Xu, Junping
    Chung, Mi Young
    Kim, Chang Kil
    [J]. PLANT METHODS, 2024, 20 (01)
  • [25] Editing of the ethylene biosynthesis gene in carnation using CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complex
    Oluwaseun Suleimon Adedeji
    Aung Htay Naing
    Hyunhee Kang
    Junping Xu
    Mi Young Chung
    Chang Kil Kim
    [J]. Plant Methods, 20
  • [26] An efficient and precise method for generating knockout cell lines based on CRISPR-Cas9 system
    Lu, Xibin
    Guo, Yuhan
    Gu, Shu
    Tan, Deng
    Cheng, Baoyun
    Li, Zhoufang
    Huang, Wei
    [J]. ENGINEERING IN LIFE SCIENCES, 2020, 20 (12): : 585 - 593
  • [27] CRISPR-Cas9 for Drug Discovery in Oncology
    Guichard, Sylvie M.
    [J]. ANNUAL REPORTS IN MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, VOL 50: PLATFORM TECHNOLOGIES IN DRUG DISCOVERY AND VALIDATION, 2017, 50 : 61 - 85
  • [28] Establishment of knockout adult sea urchins by using a CRISPR-Cas9 system
    Liu, Daming
    Awazu, Akinori
    Sakuma, Tetsushi
    Yamamoto, Takashi
    Sakamoto, Naoaki
    [J]. DEVELOPMENT GROWTH & DIFFERENTIATION, 2019, 61 (06) : 378 - 388
  • [29] Genome-scale CRISPR-Cas9 knockout and transcriptional activation screening
    Joung, Julia
    Konermann, Silvana
    Gootenberg, Jonathan S.
    Abudayyeh, Omar O.
    Platt, Randall J.
    Brigham, Mark D.
    Sanjana, Neville E.
    Zhang, Feng
    [J]. NATURE PROTOCOLS, 2017, 12 (04) : 828 - 863
  • [30] CRISPR/Cas9 Ribonucleoprotein-mediated Precise Gene Editing by Tube Electroporation
    Ma, Linyuan
    Jang, Lydia
    Chen, Jian
    Song, Jun
    Yang, Dongshan
    Zhang, Jifeng
    Chen, Y. Eugene
    Xu, Jie
    [J]. JOVE-JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS, 2019, (148):