An artificial intelligence (AI)-based approach to clinical trial recruitment: The impact of Viz RECRUIT on enrollment in the EMBOLISE trial

被引:2
|
作者
Hassan, Ameer E. [1 ,2 ]
Ravi, Saisree [1 ,3 ]
Desai, Sohum [1 ,2 ]
Saei, Hamzah M. [2 ]
Mckennon, Ermias [2 ]
Tekle, Wondwossen G. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Rio Grande Valley, Sch Med, Dept Neurol, Harlingen, TX USA
[2] Valley Baptist Med Ctr, Dept Neurosci, Harlingen, TX USA
[3] Univ Texas Rio Grande Valley, Sch Med, Dept Neurol, 1214W Schunior St, Edinburg, TX 78541 USA
关键词
MMA embolization; subdural; technology; AI; artificial intelligence; clinical trial; EMBOLIZATION; HEMORRHAGE;
D O I
10.1177/15910199231184604
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background EMBOLISE (NCT 04402632) is an ongoing randomized controlled trial investigating the safety and efficacy of middle meningeal artery embolization for the treatment of subacute or chronic subdural hematoma (SDH). Viz RECRUIT SDH is an artificial intelligence (AI)-based software platform that can automatically detect SDH in noncontrast computed tomography (NCHCT) images and report the volume, maximum thickness, and midline shift. We hypothesized that the mobile recruitment platform would aid enrollment and coordinate communication and image sharing among the entire research team. Materials and methods Patient enrollment in EMBOLISE prior to and after implementation of Viz RECRUIT SDH at a large comprehensive stroke center was compared along with the performance of the software platform. The EMBOLISE trial was activated on May 5, 2021, and Viz RECRUIT SDH was activated on October 6, 2021. The pre-AI cohort consisted of all patients from EMBOLISE to AI activation (153 days), and the post-AI cohort consisted of all patients from AI activation until August 18, 2022 (316 days). All alerts for suspected SDH candidates were manually reviewed to determine the positive predictive value (PPV) of the algorithm. Results Prior to AI-software implementation, there were 5 patients enrolled (0.99 patients/month) and one screen failure. After the implementation of the software, enrollment increased by 36% to 1.35 patients/month (14 total enrolled), and there were no screen failures. Over the entire post-AI period, a total of 6244 NCHCTs were processed by the system with 207 total SDH detections (3% prevalence). 35% of all alerts for suspected SDH were viewed within 10 min, and 50% were viewed within an hour. The PPV of the algorithm was 81.4 (CI [75.3, 86.7]). Conclusion The implementation of an AI-based software for the automatic screening of SDH patients increased the enrollment rate in the EMBOLISE trial, and the software performed well in a real-world, clinical trial setting.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effects of an Artificial Intelligence (AI) System on Clinical Trial Enrollment in Lung Cancer
    Leventakos, K.
    Helgeson, J.
    Mansfield, A.
    Deering, E.
    Schwecke, A.
    Adjei, A.
    Molina, J.
    Hocum, C.
    Parikh, K.
    Halfdanarson, T.
    Marks, R.
    Bleeker, T.
    Pomerleau, K.
    Coverdill, S.
    Rammage, M.
    Preininger, A.
    Jackson, G. Purcell
    Haddad, T.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2019, 14 (10) : S592 - S592
  • [2] Recruitment and enrollment of caregivers for a lifestyle physical activity clinical trial
    Etkin, Caryn D.
    Farran, Carol J.
    Barnes, Lisa L.
    Shah, Raj C.
    RESEARCH IN NURSING & HEALTH, 2012, 35 (01) : 70 - 81
  • [3] Clinical audit of an artificial intelligence (AI) empowered smile simulation system: a prospective clinical trial
    Adel, Samar M.
    Bichu, Yashodhan M.
    Pandian, Srirengalakshmi Muthuswamy
    Sabouni, Waddah
    Shah, Chandani
    Vaiid, Nikhillesh
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [4] Recruitment and enrollment in a randomized clinical trial of mandibular two-implant overdenture
    Lee, Jeong-Yol
    Kim, Min-Soo
    Kim, Ha-Young
    Shin, Sang-Wan
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED PROSTHODONTICS, 2013, 5 (02) : 204 - 208
  • [5] Screening for peripartum cardiomyopathies using artificial intelligence in Nigeria (SPEC-AI Nigeria): Clinical trial rationale and design
    Adedinsewo, Demilade A.
    Morales-Lara, Andrea Carolina
    Dugan, Jennifer
    Garzon-Siatoya, Wendy T.
    Yao, Xiaoxi
    Johnson, Patrick W.
    Douglass, Erika J.
    Attia, Zachi I.
    Phillips, Sabrina D.
    Yamani, Mohamad H.
    Tobah, Yvonne Butler
    Rose, Carl H.
    Sharpe, Emily E.
    Lopez-Jimenez, Francisco
    Friedman, Paul A.
    Noseworthy, Peter A.
    Carter, Rickey E.
    AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2023, 261 : 64 - 74
  • [6] Clinical trial enrollers vs nonenrollers: The cardiac arrhythmia suppression trial (CAST) recruitment and enrollment assessment in clinical trials (REACT) project
    Gorkin, L
    Schron, EB
    Handshaw, K
    Shea, S
    Kinney, MR
    Branyon, M
    Campion, J
    Bigger, JT
    Sylvia, SC
    Duggan, J
    Stylianou, M
    Lancaster, S
    Ahern, DK
    Follick, MJ
    CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1996, 17 (01): : 46 - 59
  • [7] A Scalable AI Approach for Clinical Trial Cohort Optimization
    Liu, Xiong
    Shi, Cheng
    Deore, Uday
    Wang, Yingbo
    Tran, Myah
    Khalil, Iya
    Devarakonda, Murthy
    MACHINE LEARNING AND PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE OF KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY IN DATABASES, PT II, 2021, 1525 : 479 - 489
  • [8] Experience With Direct-to-Patient Recruitment for Enrollment Into a Clinical Trial in a Rare Disease: A Web-Based Study
    Krischer, Jeffrey
    Cronholm, Peter F.
    Burroughs, Cristina
    McAlear, Carol A.
    Borchin, Renee
    Easley, Ebony
    Davis, Trocon
    Kullman, Joyce
    Carette, Simon
    Khalidi, Nader
    Koening, Curry
    Langford, Carol A.
    Monach, Paul
    Moreland, Larry
    Pagnoux, Christian
    Specks, Ulrich
    Sreih, Antoine G.
    Ytterberg, Steven
    Merkel, Peter A.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2017, 19 (02)
  • [9] Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Based simulators versus simulated patients in undergraduate programs: A protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Zidoun, Youness
    EL Mardi, Abdelmoniem
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [10] Improving Clinical Trial Participant Prescreening With Artificial Intelligence (AI): A Comparison of the Results of AI-Assisted vs Standard Methods in 3 Oncology Trials
    Calaprice-Whitty, Denise
    Galil, Karim
    Salloum, Wael
    Zariv, Ashkon
    Jimenez, Bernal
    THERAPEUTIC INNOVATION & REGULATORY SCIENCE, 2020, 54 (01) : 69 - 74