Measurable residual disease in chronic lymphocytic leukemia

被引:5
|
作者
Benintende, Giulia [1 ]
Pozzo, Federico [2 ]
Innocenti, Idanna [3 ]
Autore, Francesco [3 ]
Fresa, Alberto [3 ]
D'Arena, Giovanni [4 ]
Gattei, Valter [2 ]
Lurenti, Luca [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Dipartimento Sci Radiolog Ematolog, Sez Ematol, Rome, Italy
[2] CRO Ist Ricovero & Cura Carattere Sci IRCCS, Ctr Riferimento Oncol Aviano, Clin & Expt Onco Hematol Unit, Aviano, Italy
[3] Fdn Policlin Univ, Gemelli Ist Ricovero & Cura Carattere Sci IRCCS, Dipartimento Diagnost Immagini, Radioterapia Oncolog Ematol, Rome, Italy
[4] San Luca Hosp, Azienda Sanit Locale ASL Salerno, Salerno, Italy
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2023年 / 13卷
关键词
measurable residual disease; chronic lymphocytic leukemia; flow cytometry; ASO-PCR; next generation sequencing; surrogate endpoint; PREVIOUSLY UNTREATED PATIENTS; OPEN-LABEL; GENE REARRANGEMENTS; FLOW-CYTOMETRY; FOLLOW-UP; RQ-PCR; CLL; VENETOCLAX; RITUXIMAB; IBRUTINIB;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2023.1112616
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Measurable residual disease (MRD) is defined as the presence of residual cancer cells after treatment in patients with clinically undetectable disease, who would otherwise be considered in complete remission. It is a highly sensitive parameter which indicates the disease burden and predicts survival in this setting of patients. In recent years, MRD has gained a role in many hematological malignancies as a surrogate endpoint for clinical trials: undetectable MRD has been correlated to longer progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). New drugs and combinations have been developed with the aim to achieve MRD negativity, which would indicate favorable prognosis. Different methods to measure MRD have also been devised, which include flow cytometry, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and next generation sequencing (NGS), with different sensitivity and accuracy in evaluating deep remission after treatment. In this review, we will analyze the current recommendations for the detection of MRD, with particular focus on its role in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL), as well as the different detection methods. Moreover, we will discuss the results of clinical trials and the role of MRD in new therapeutic schemes with inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies. MRD is not currently used in the clinical practice to evaluate response to treatment, due to technical and economical limitations, but it's gaining more and more interest in trials settings, especially since the introduction of venetoclax. The use of MRD in trials will likely be followed by a broader practical application in the future. The aim of this work is to provide a reader-friendly summary of the state of art in the field, as MRD will soon become an accessible tool to evaluate our patients, predict their survival and guide physician's therapeutic choices and preferences.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Measurable residual disease in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia
    Uchiyama, Takayoshi
    Yokoyama, Aki
    Aoki, Sadao
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL HEMATOPATHOLOGY, 2020, 60 (04) : 138 - 145
  • [2] The evolving use of measurable residual disease in chronic lymphocytic leukemia clinical trials
    Fisher, A.
    Goradia, H.
    Martinez-Calle, N.
    Patten, P. E. M.
    Munir, T.
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2023, 13
  • [3] Measurable Residual Disease in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Current Understanding and Evolving Role in Clinical Practice
    Rios-Olais, Fausto Alfredo
    Hilal, Talal
    CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN ONCOLOGY, 2023, 24 (08) : 907 - 928
  • [4] The Role of Minimal Residual Disease in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
    Al-Sawaf, Othman
    Hallek, Michael
    Fischer, Kirsten
    CLINICAL ADVANCES IN HEMATOLOGY & ONCOLOGY, 2022, 20 (02) : 97 - 103
  • [5] Flow cytometric evaluation of measurable residual disease in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: Where do we stand?
    D'Arena, Giovanni
    Sgambato, Alessandro
    Volpe, Silvestro
    Coppola, Giuseppe
    Amodeo, Rachele
    Tirino, Virginia
    D'Auria, Fiorella
    Statuto, Teodora
    Valvano, Luciana
    Pietrantuono, Giuseppe
    Deaglio, Silvia
    Efremov, Dimitar
    Laurenti, Luca
    Aiello, Antonella
    HEMATOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 40 (05) : 835 - 842
  • [6] Should Undetectable Minimal Residual Disease Be the Goal of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Therapy?
    Al-Sawaf, Othman
    Seymour, John F.
    Kater, Arnon P.
    Fischer, Kirsten
    HEMATOLOGY-ONCOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2021, 35 (04) : 775 - 791
  • [7] Minimal Residual Disease in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: A New Goal?
    Del Giudice, Ilaria
    Raponi, Sara
    Della Starza, Irene
    De Propris, Maria Stefania
    Cavalli, Marzia
    De Novi, Lucia Anna
    Cappelli, Luca Vincenzo
    Ilari, Caterina
    Cafforio, Luciana
    Guarini, Anna
    Foa, Robin
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2019, 9
  • [8] Measurable Residual Disease in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Experience in Real-Life Setting with Dry Tube Flow Cytometric Method
    Akpinar, Seval
    Turgut, Burhan
    NAMIK KEMAL MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 10 (02): : 147 - 154
  • [9] Measurable residual disease in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: expert review and consensus recommendations
    Wierda, William G.
    Rawstron, Andrew
    Cymbalista, Florence
    Badoux, Xavier
    Rossi, Davide
    Brown, Jennifer R.
    Egle, Alexander
    Abello, Virginia
    Cervera Ceballos, Eduardo
    Herishanu, Yair
    Mulligan, Stephen P.
    Niemann, Carsten U.
    Diong, Colin P.
    Soysal, Teoman
    Suzuki, Ritsuro
    Tran, Hoa T. T.
    Wu, Shang-Ju
    Owen, Carolyn
    Stilgenbauer, Stephan
    Ghia, Paolo
    Hillmen, Peter
    LEUKEMIA, 2021, 35 (11) : 3059 - 3072
  • [10] Performance of a novel eight-color flow cytometry panel for measurable residual disease assessment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia
    Chen, Xiao
    Chen, Xia
    Zhao, Sishu
    Shi, Yu
    Zhang, Ninghan
    Guo, Zhen
    Qiao, Chun
    Jin, Huimin
    Zhu, Liying
    Zhu, Huayuan
    Li, Jianyong
    Wu, Yujie
    CYTOMETRY PART B-CLINICAL CYTOMETRY, 2024, 106 (03) : 181 - 191