Multi-user centered design: acceptance, user experience, user research and user testing

被引:17
作者
Sylvain, Fleury [1 ]
Chaniaud, Noemie [1 ]
机构
[1] HESAM Univ, Arts & Metiers Inst Technol, LAMPA, F-53810 Change, France
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
User centered design; technology acceptance; user testing; user research; multi-user; user experience; INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; SOCIAL-INFLUENCE; PERCEIVED USEFULNESS; MODEL; GENDER;
D O I
10.1080/1463922X.2023.2166623
中图分类号
TB18 [人体工程学];
学科分类号
1201 ;
摘要
In recent years, technologies have evolved towards social, universal and collaborative uses involving multiple users. However, methods and models from user centered design are focused on single-user design and do not take into account the impact of other users on intentions and behaviors to use the technology. The objective of this article is to provide paths of reflection on how to integrate a multi-user centered approach to existing user centered design methods and models. Each phase of user-centered design has been rethought to implement this new framework. Guidelines for moving from user experience to Multi-User eXperience (MUX) are provided. In the same way, we recommend adding a multi-user variable in the technology acceptance models to become the Multi-user Acceptance Model (MAM). User research and user testing have also been rethought to a multi-user reach and a multi-user testing. All these considerations are discussed, and lead to a proposal of a future Multi-user Centered Design (MCD) approach, specifically adapted to manage multi-user digital technology development projects. Finally, it is therefore necessary and important to direct research in the fields (acceptance, user experience, user research and user testing) to assist designers with the development of new methods of product design more respectful of social, environmental and collaborative values.
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 224
页数:16
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]   Digital working during the COVID-19 pandemic: how task-technology fit improves work performance and lessens feelings of loneliness [J].
Abelsen, Simen Nordbo ;
Vatne, Svenn-Helge ;
Mikalef, Patrick ;
Choudrie, Jyoti .
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & PEOPLE, 2023, 36 (05) :2063-2087
[2]   Industry 4.0 collaborative networks for industrial performance [J].
Aguiar Lima Dos Santos, Leonardo Moraes ;
da Costa, Matheus Becker ;
Kothe, Joao Victor ;
Benitez, Guilherme Brittes ;
Schaefer, Jones Luis ;
Baierle, Ismael Cristofer ;
Benitez Nara, Elpidio Oscar .
JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2021, 32 (02) :245-265
[3]   THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR [J].
AJZEN, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) :179-211
[4]  
Ajzen I., 1985, ACTION CONTROL COGNI, P11, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2
[5]   Perceived usefulness, user involvement and behavioral intention: an empirical study of ERP implementation [J].
Amoako-Gyampah, Kwasi .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2007, 23 (03) :1232-1248
[6]  
Andersen Simon Bruntse, 2017, Design, User Experience and Usability: Theory, Methodology and Management. 6th International Conference, DUXU 2017, held as part of HCI International 2017. Proceedings: LNCS 10288, P327, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-58634-2_25
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Brainstorming and Beyond:A User-Centered Design Method
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2009, 9241 210 2010 ERGONO
[9]   Usability testing: a review of some methodological and technical aspects of the method [J].
Bastien, J. M. Christian .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2010, 79 (04) :E18-E23
[10]   The role of trust in intention to use the IoT in eHealth: Application of the modified UTAUT in a consumer context [J].
Ben Arfi, Wissal ;
Ben Nasr, Imed ;
Kondrateva, Galina ;
Hikkerova, Lubica .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2021, 167 (167)