Impact of geostatistical nonstationarity on convolutional neural network predictions

被引:6
作者
Liu, Lei [1 ]
Prodanovic, Masa [1 ]
Pyrcz, Michael J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, Hildebrand Dept Petr & Geosyst Engn, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[2] Univ Texas Austin, Jackson Sch Geosci, Austin, TX 78712 USA
关键词
Geostatistics; Nonstationarity; Deep learning; Convolutional neural network; NON-STATIONARITY; MODELS;
D O I
10.1007/s10596-022-10181-3
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are gaining tremendous attention in subsurface studies due to their ability to learn from spatial image data. However, most deep learning studies in spatial context do not consider the impact of geostatistical nonstationarity, which is commonly encountered within the subsurface phenomenon. We demonstrate the impact of geostatistical nonstationarity on CNN prediction performance. We propose a CNN model to predict the variogram range of sequential Gaussian simulation (SGS) realizations. Model performance is evaluated for stationarity and three common forms of geostatistical nonstationarity: (1) large relative variogram range-related nonstationarity, (2) additive trend and residual model-related nonstationarity, and (3) mixture population model-related nonstationarity. Our CNN model prediction accuracy decreases in the presence of large relative variogram range-related nonstationarity, for the additive trend and residual model-related nonstationarity, the relative prediction errors increase for high trend variance proportions with a decrease in variogram range; regarding the mixture population model-related nonstationarity, the predictions are closer to the smaller variogram range. Common forms of geostatistical nonstationarity may impact CNN predictions, as with geostatistical estimation methods, trend removal and workflows with stationary residuals are recommended.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 44
页数:10
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [21] Propagating uncertainty through spatial estimation processes for old-growth subalpine forests using sequential Gaussian simulation in GIS
    Mowrer, HT
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 1997, 98 (01) : 73 - 86
  • [22] Which Path to Choose in Sequential Gaussian Simulation
    Nussbaumer, Raphael
    Mariethoz, Gregoire
    Gloaguen, Erwan
    Holliger, Klaus
    [J]. MATHEMATICAL GEOSCIENCES, 2018, 50 (01) : 97 - 120
  • [23] Detection of nonstationarities in geological time series: Wavelet transform of chaotic and cyclic sequences
    Prokoph, A
    Barthelmes, F
    [J]. COMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCES, 1996, 22 (10) : 1097 - 1108
  • [24] Pyrcz M.J., 2014, Geostatistical Reservoir Modeling
  • [25] Deep learning
    Rusk, Nicole
    [J]. NATURE METHODS, 2016, 13 (01) : 35 - 35
  • [26] Fair train-test split in machine learning: Mitigating spatial autocorrelation for improved prediction accuracy
    Salazar, Jose J.
    Garland, Lean
    Ochoa, Jesus
    Pyrcz, Michael J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2022, 209
  • [27] Computationally Efficient Multiscale Neural Networks Applied to Fluid Flow in Complex 3D Porous Media
    Santos, Javier E.
    Yin, Ying
    Jo, Honggeun
    Pan, Wen
    Kang, Qinjun
    Viswanathan, Hari S.
    Prodanovic, Masa
    Pyrcz, Michael J.
    Lubbers, Nicholas
    [J]. TRANSPORT IN POROUS MEDIA, 2021, 140 (01) : 241 - 272
  • [28] Noise and spatial resolution properties of a commercially available deep learning-based CT reconstruction algorithm
    Solomon, Justin
    Lyu, Peijei
    Marin, Daniele
    Samei, Ehsan
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (09) : 3961 - 3971
  • [29] Induced seismicity of the Groningen gas field: History and recent developments
    Van Thienen-Visser, K.
    Breunese, J.N.
    [J]. Leading Edge, 2015, 34 (06) : 664 - 671
  • [30] Verly G., 1993, GENER ACCUMUL PROD E, VIII, P345, DOI [10.1007/978-3-642-77859-928, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-77859-928, 10.1007/978-3-642-77859-9_28, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-77859-9_28]