Exploring Digital Means to Engage Visitors with Roman Culture: Virtual Reality vs. Tangible Interaction

被引:7
作者
Petrelli, Daniela [1 ]
Roberts, Andrew J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Sheffield Hallam Univ, Art Design & Media Res Ctr, Cantor Bldg,153 Arundel St, Sheffield S1 2NU, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Properties Historians Team English Heritage, 6th Floor,100 Wood St, London EC2V 7AN, England
来源
ACM JOURNAL ON COMPUTING AND CULTURAL HERITAGE | 2023年 / 16卷 / 04期
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Human-computer interaction; virtual reality; ubiquitous computing; tangible interaction; visitor's engagement; immersion; design research; qualitative research;
D O I
10.1145/3625367
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
To effectively communicate the archaeological remains of the distant past is a challenge: Little may be left to see, and the culture may be very different to comprehend. This article compares two technological approaches to communicating Roman archaeology in museums: virtual reality and tangible interaction. Although very different in rationale, design, and implementation, the two explorative studies have the same aim of engaging visitors with important exhibits. The challenge is to effectively communicate the exhibit's original and cultural context. In "Views of the Past," virtual reality was used to support an environmental narrative experience where fragments of history are found scattered in the 3D reconstructed forum of Augustus in Rome. In "My Roman Pantheon," a tangible interactive installation, visitors act as Romans living along Hadrian's Wall making offerings to the deities of the Roman pantheon to secure their protection. In both explorative studies the combination of the features (virtual reality + narratives, tangible + acting) make visitors feel "cultural presence," where the perception of a place is combined with the awareness of the culture and an understanding of the past. Although they work on very different sensorial reaction (sight for virtual reality, touch for tangible interaction), both are promising mechanisms to design effective visitors' experiences for challenging cultural heritage settings.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 56 条
[41]   Phone vs. Tangible in Museums: A Comparative Study [J].
Petrelli, Daniela ;
O'Brien, Sinead .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2018 CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS (CHI 2018), 2018,
[42]   Exploring the Aesthetics of Tangible Interaction: Experiments on the Perception of Hybrid Objects [J].
Petrelli, Daniela ;
Soranzo, Alessandro ;
Ciolfi, Luigina ;
Reidy, John .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE TENTH ANNIVERSARY CONFERENCE ON TANGIBLE EMBEDDED AND EMBODIED INTERACTION (TEI16), 2016, :100-108
[43]  
Petrelli Daniela, 2018, 3 INT DIGITAL HERITA, DOI [10.1109/TSMC.2013.2246032, DOI 10.1109/TSMC.2013.2246032]
[44]  
Pletinckx Daniel, 2007, VIRTEX: A Multisensory Approach for Exhibiting Valuable Objects
[45]   Evaluating presence in cultural heritage projects [J].
Pujol, Laia ;
Champion, Erik .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HERITAGE STUDIES, 2012, 18 (01) :83-102
[46]  
Rae Jono, 2016, MUSEUMS WEB C MW 16
[47]  
Rouse Richard., 2010, GAME DEVELOPERS C
[48]   Viking VR: Designing a Virtual Reality Experience for a Museum [J].
Schofield, Guy ;
Beale, Gareth ;
Beale, Nicole ;
Fell, Martin ;
Hadley, Dawn ;
Hook, Jonathan ;
Murphy, Damian ;
Richards, Julian ;
Thresh, Lewis .
DIS 2018: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2018 DESIGNING INTERACTIVE SYSTEMS CONFERENCE, 2018, :805-815
[49]   Research on presence in virtual reality: A survey [J].
Schuemie, MJ ;
Van der Straaten, P ;
Krijn, M ;
Van der Mast, CAPG .
CYBERPSYCHOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 2001, 4 (02) :183-201
[50]  
Serrel B., 1992, CURATOR, V35, P181, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.2151-6952.1992.TB00753.X