Performance assessment of RC frame buildings with open ground storey

被引:4
作者
Tamizharasi, G. [1 ]
Shubham, T. [2 ]
Aditya, L. [1 ]
Senthilkumar, R. [2 ]
机构
[1] SV Natl Inst Technol, Dept Civil Engn, Surat 395007, Gujarat, India
[2] Natl Inst Technol Tiruchirappalli, Dept Civil Engn, Tiruchirappalli, India
关键词
Open ground storey (OGS); Modification factor; Response reduction factor; Equivalent strut; Structural walls;
D O I
10.1016/j.istruc.2023.105662
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Buildings with open ground storey (OGS) evidenced catastrophic failure in past earthquakes. Building code provisions usually: (i) avoid designing such buildings (e.g., ASCE 7-16), (ii) provide structural walls up to 2% plan density (e.g., IS 1893-1) and (iii) design by amplifying the demand at ground storey using modification factor (e.g., Eurocode 8) or reducing the response reduction factor using an irregularity factor (e.g., NTE-E030). Hence applicability of these provisions is checked with a set of 2D RC frame buildings; it includes (i) a simple OGS building (OGS1), (ii) OGS building with structural wall at ground storey, IS 1893-1 (OGS2), (iii) OGS buildings designed as per NTE-E030 (OGS3) and Eurocode 8 (OGS4). Their inelastic behaviour is obtained using nonlinear static and dynamic analysis, including infill walls as an equivalent strut. OGS2 suffered the least (damage in struts), and OGS3 sustained more damage (in struts, beams and columns). It is mandatory to provide structural walls at the ground storey rather than designing for amplified force demands. A parametric study is conducted (for OGS using IS 1893-1): (a) by varying the height of the building, and (b) including structural walls in 1, 3 and 5 bays. Increasing height or providing structural walls in more bays increases damage in struts and no damage in other elements. The response reduction factor (R) for OGS3 is more than OGS1, OGS2 and OGS4, as it shows more damage; it is necessary to avoid damage in OGS buildings. Also, the R-value reduces with building height and increases with structural walls in more bays; thus, a single R-value is not applicable to all buildings.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
Bhatt MR., 2017, Kathmandu Univ J Sci Eng Technol, V13, P79
[2]   Vertical Irregularity of Buildings: Regularity Index versus Seismic Risk [J].
Bhosale, A. S. ;
Davis, Robin ;
Sarkar, Pradip .
ASCE-ASME JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY IN ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PART A-CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2017, 3 (03)
[3]   Component Level Fragility Estimation for Vertically Irregular Reinforced Concrete Frames [J].
Choudhury, Trishna ;
Kaushik, Hemant B. .
JOURNAL OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2020, 24 (06) :947-971
[4]  
Goud S.S., 2017, 16 WORLD C EARTHQ 16
[5]   Failure of weak-storey during earthquakes [J].
Kirac, Nevzat ;
Dogan, Mizam ;
Ozbasaran, Hakan .
ENGINEERING FAILURE ANALYSIS, 2011, 18 (02) :572-581
[6]   THEORETICAL STRESS-STRAIN MODEL FOR CONFINED CONCRETE [J].
MANDER, JB ;
PRIESTLEY, MJN ;
PARK, R .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1988, 114 (08) :1804-1826
[7]   Performance-based evaluation of the response reduction factor for ductile RC frames [J].
Mondal, Apurba ;
Ghosh, Siddhartha ;
Reddy, G. R. .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2013, 56 :1808-1819
[8]  
Niharika T, 2020, 17 WORLD C EARTHQ EN
[9]  
Paidalwar A, 2017, SSRG Int J Civ Eng (SSRG-IJCE), V4, P37, DOI [10.14445/23488352/IJCE-V4I6P106, DOI 10.14445/23488352/IJCE-V4I6P106]
[10]  
Panagiotakos T.B., 1996, P 11 WORLD C EARTHQ