A multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) kit targeting VP664 and VP28 genes of white spot syndrome virus (WSSV)

被引:2
作者
Kim, Hwi-Jin [1 ]
Shyam, K. U. [1 ]
Oh, Myung-Joo [1 ]
Lee, Jun-hee [2 ]
Rajendran, K. V. [3 ]
Kim, Do-Hyung [4 ]
Kim, Hyoung Jun [5 ]
Kim, Wi-Sik [1 ]
机构
[1] Chonnam Natl Univ, Dept Aqualife Med, Yeosu 59626, South Korea
[2] Bioneer, Daejeon 34302, South Korea
[3] Cent Univ Kerala, Kasaragod 671316, Kerala, India
[4] Pukyong Natl Univ, Dept Aquat Life Med, Pusan 48513, South Korea
[5] Natl Inst Fisheries Sci, WOAH Reference Lab VHS, Pusan 46083, South Korea
关键词
Shrimp; White spot syndrome virus; Multiplex real-time PCR; AccuPower (R) WSSV detection qPCR kit; PCR; SHRIMP; DENSOVIRUS; DISEASES; AMERICA; GENOME; PRAWN;
D O I
10.1016/j.aquaculture.2023.739968
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
The implementation of a precise and sensitive detection method is crucial to prevent the spread of the white spot syndrome virus (WSSV) within and between regions. The present study developed and validated the analytical and diagnostic performances of a multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction kit (AccuPower (R) WSSV detection qPCR kit: AWqPCR kit) that simultaneously detects two distinct genomic sequences of WSSV (VP664 and VP28). The analytical sensitivity of the kit, defined as 95% limit of detection (LoD(95%)), was 1.15 copies of WSSV plasmid. No cross-reactivity was found against five shrimp pathogens (yellow head virus genotype 1, Taura syndrome virus, infectious myonecrosis virus, infectious hypodermal and hematopoietic necrosis virus, and Vibrio parahaemolyticus). Moreover, no significant PCR inhibition was observed while using nine potential interfering materials (antibiotics and immunostimulants). Diagnostic performance was evaluated using 200 known WSSV-infected whiteleg shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei). Compared to the IQ2000 (TM) WSSV Detection and Prevention System (IQ2000 (TM) WSSV DPS), the diagnostic sensitivity (Dsn) and specificity (Dsp) of the AWqPCR kit were found to be 100% (95% confidence interval (CI): 96.38-100%) and 100% (95% CI: 96.38-100%), respectively. In addition, using 50 shrimp samples of unknown WSSV infection status, the Dsn and Dsp of the AWqPCR kit were compared to the two available gold standard WSSV detection methods, including the qPCR assay using WOAH primers and probe (WOAH qPCR) and IQ2000 (TM) WSSV DPS. The evaluated Dsn and Dsp of the kit were 100% (95% CI: 87.66-100%) and 72.73% (95% CI: 49.78-89.27%) compared to the WOAH qPCR, whereas the Dsn and Dsp were 100% (95% CI: 25-100%) and 32.65% (95% CI: 19.95-47.54%) when compared to the IQ2000 (TM) WSSV DPS. All six samples that were detected as WSSV-positive by the AWqPCR kit and confirmed by sequencing were found to be WSSV-negative by WOAH qPCR. Furthermore, the blind sample analysis of 50 shrimp samples carried out by three laboratories showed no significant difference in the test results. Overall, AWqPCR kit was found to be a simple and reliable method for WSSV detection with high sensitivity and specificity. Therefore, it could be applied in quarantine, surveillance, and monitoring programmes as well as for the confirmation of WSSV in apparently healthy shrimps.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Aktar S, 2020, J FISH, V8, P885, DOI 10.17017/j.fish.230
[2]   Facts, truths and myths about SPF shrimp in Aquaculture [J].
Alday-Sanz, Victoria ;
Brock, James ;
Flegel, Timothy W. ;
McIntosh, Robins ;
Bondad-Reantaso, Melba G. ;
Salazar, Marcela ;
Subasinghe, Rohana .
REVIEWS IN AQUACULTURE, 2020, 12 (01) :76-84
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture, DOI [10.4060/cc0461en, DOI 10.4060/CC0461-N, 10.4060/cc0461-n]
[4]   Detection and quantification of infectious hypodermal and hematopoietic necrosis virus and white spot virus in shrimp using real-time quantitative PCR and SYBR green chemistry [J].
Dhar, AK ;
Roux, MM ;
Klimpel, KR .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2001, 39 (08) :2835-2845
[5]   Multiplex PCR: Optimization and application in diagnostic virology [J].
Elnifro, EM ;
Ashshi, AM ;
Cooper, RJ ;
Klapper, PE .
CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY REVIEWS, 2000, 13 (04) :559-+
[6]  
Escobedo-Bonilla CM, 2008, J FISH DIS, V31, P1, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2761.2007.00877.x
[7]   Research progress on viral accommodation 2009 to 2019 [J].
Flegel, T. W. .
DEVELOPMENTAL AND COMPARATIVE IMMUNOLOGY, 2020, 112
[8]   White spot syndrome virus genetic variants detected in Mexico by a new multiplex PCR method [J].
Galavíz-Silva, L ;
Molina-Garza, ZJ ;
Alcocer-González, JM ;
Rosales-Encinas, JL ;
Ibarra-Gámez, C .
AQUACULTURE, 2004, 242 (1-4) :53-68
[9]   Genomic attributes and recent advances in detection of white spot syndrome virus in shrimp: a review [J].
Hossain, Md Nazmul ;
Chowdhury, Tanjia Afrin ;
Hasan, Mahmudul ;
Azim, Kazi Faizul ;
Jenny, Sayadatunnasa ;
Rabbee, Muhammad Fazle ;
Rahman, Md Mahbubur ;
Somana, Saneya Risa .
MARINE BIOLOGY RESEARCH, 2021, 17 (9-10) :794-814
[10]   A review on molecular detection techniques of white spot syndrome virus: Perspectives of problems and solutions in shrimp farming [J].
Islam, Sk Injamamul ;
Mou, Moslema Jahan ;
Sanjida, Saloa ;
Mahfuj, Sarower .
VETERINARY MEDICINE AND SCIENCE, 2023, 9 (02) :778-801