From HVSR to site SH response function: Potentiality and pitfalls inferred by 1D physical modelling

被引:1
作者
Paolucci, Enrico [1 ]
Tanzini, Anna [1 ]
Albarello, Dario [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Siena, Dipartimento Sci Fis Terra & Ambiente, Siena, Italy
[2] CNR, Ist Geol Ambientale & Geoingn, Rome, Italy
关键词
Site amplification; HVSR; SH acceleration Transfer function; Numerical modelling; Peak frequencies; Peak amplitudes; H/V SPECTRAL RATIO; WAVE-FIELD; AMBIENT VIBRATIONS; FREQUENCY; CLASSIFICATION; AMPLIFICATION; INVERSION; DENSITY; MOTION; NOISE;
D O I
10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107703
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
The capability of the ambient vibration Horizontal to Vertical Spectral Ratios (HVSR) in identifying the main aspects characterizing the conventional 1D site response curve was explored by physical modelling. This approach avoids possible biases induced by data processing by focusing on the underlying physical phenomenon. Moreover, differently from empirical approaches, this also allows exploring an unlimited range of subsoil configurations. By considering a huge set of realistic Vs profiles, HVSR curves were simulated and compared with the corresponding SH acceleration transfer functions (ATFs) obtained by linear equivalent numerical modelling, which is a standard for the professional practice. These comparisons focused on the values of F-0 (the lowest resonance frequency), F-d (the frequency associated with maximum peak amplitude) and corresponding amplitudes (A(0) and A(d) respectively). Outcomes indicate that when F-0 and F-d values coincide, frequency of the HVSR peak represents a reliable proxy to identify 1D resonance frequency. HVSR remains a good proxy for F-0 in the remaining cases, while it is less effective concerning F-d in particular when this value is different from F-0 and is identified in the frequency range 10-30 Hz. Finally, the results concerning peak amplitude values show a tendency by HVSR to underestimate in a similar way both A(0) and A(d) values.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Seismic site effect in a coastal area: 1D and 2D modelling of a tuff cliff in Sorrento Peninsula, Italy
    Di Fiore, Vincenzo
    Tarallo, Daniela
    Cavuoto, Giuseppe
    Pelosi, Nicola
    Punzo, Michele
    Clemente, Paolo
    JOURNAL OF SEISMOLOGY, 2023, 27 (01) : 1 - 19
  • [2] Quantifying the edge-induced seismic aggravation in shallow basins relative to the 1D SH modelling
    Zhu, Chuanbin
    Chavez-Garcia, Francisco J.
    Thambiratnam, David
    Gallage, Chaminda
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2018, 115 : 402 - 412
  • [3] Nonlinearity and strength in 1D site response analyses: a simple constitutive approach
    Conti, Riccardo
    Angelini, Manuel
    Licata, Valeria
    BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2020, 18 (10) : 4629 - 4657
  • [4] Hybrid fuzzy - stochastic 1D site response analysis accounting for soil uncertainties
    Tombari, Alessandro
    Stefanini, Luciano
    MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2019, 132 : 102 - 121
  • [5] Physical Hypotheses for Adjusting Coarse Profiles and Improving 1D Site-Response Estimation Assessed at 10 KiK-net Sites
    Kaklamanos, James
    Bradley, Brendon A.
    Moolacattu, Aiswarya N.
    Picard, Bradley M.
    BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2020, 110 (03) : 1338 - 1358
  • [6] Assessment of site effects in the Kathmandu valley, Nepal, during the 2015 Mw 7.8 Gorkha earthquake sequence using 1D and 2D numerical modelling
    Pagliaroli, A.
    Aprile, V
    Chamlagain, D.
    Lanzo, G.
    Poovarodom, N.
    ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 2018, 239 : 50 - 62
  • [7] Challenges in Predicting Seismic Site Response with 1D Analyses: Conclusions from 114 KiK-net Vertical Seismometer Arrays
    Kaklamanos, James
    Bradley, Brendon A.
    BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2018, 108 (5A) : 2816 - 2838
  • [8] International Benchmark on Numerical Simulations for 1D, Nonlinear Site Response (PRENOLIN): Verification Phase Based on Canonical Cases
    Regnier, Julie
    Bonilla, Luis-Fabian
    Bard, Pierre-Yves
    Bertrand, Etienne
    Hollender, Fabrice
    Kawase, Hiroshi
    Sicilia, Deborah
    Arduino, Pedro
    Amorosi, Angelo
    Asimaki, Domniki
    Boldini, Daniela
    Chen, Long
    Chiaradonna, Anna
    DeMartin, Florent
    Ebrille, Marco
    Elgamal, Ahmed
    Falcone, Gaetano
    Foerster, Evelyne
    Foti, Sebastiano
    Garini, Evangelia
    Gazetas, George
    Gelis, Celine
    Ghofrani, Alborz
    Giannakou, Amalia
    Gingery, James R.
    Glinsky, Nathalie
    Harmon, Joseph
    Hashash, Youssef
    Iai, Susumu
    Jeremic, Boris
    Kramer, Steve
    Kontoe, Stavroula
    Kristek, Jozef
    Lanzo, Giuseppe
    di Lernia, Annamaria
    Lopez-Caballero, Fernando
    Marot, Marianne
    McAllister, Graeme
    Mercerat, E. Diego
    Moczo, Peter
    Montoya-Noguera, Silvana
    Musgrove, Michael
    Nieto-Ferro, Alex
    Pagliaroli, Alessandro
    Pisano, Federico
    Richterova, Aneta
    Sajana, Suwal
    d'Avila, Maria Paola Santisi
    Shi, Jian
    Silvestri, Francesco
    BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2016, 106 (05) : 2112 - 2135
  • [9] Does the 1D assumption hold for real sites? An analysis of KiK-net site responses and implication for ground motion modelling
    Pilz, M.
    Kotha, S. R.
    Cotton, F.
    EARTHQUAKE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING FOR PROTECTION AND DEVELOPMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSTRUCTIONS, 2019, 4 : 4464 - 4471
  • [10] Site-to-bedrock over 1D transfer function ratio: An indicator of the proportion of edge-generated surface waves?
    Cornou, C
    Bard, PY
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2003, 30 (09)