Techno-economic comparative analysis of solar thermal collectors and high-temperature heat pumps for industrial steam generation

被引:31
作者
Saini, Puneet [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ghasemi, Mohammad [1 ]
Arpagaus, Cordin [4 ]
Bless, Frederic [4 ]
Bertsch, Stefan [4 ]
Zhang, Xingxing [1 ]
机构
[1] Dalarna Univ, Dept Energy & Construction Engn, S-79188 Falun, Sweden
[2] Uppsala Univ, Dept Civil & Ind Engn, S-75236 Uppsala, Sweden
[3] Absolicon Solar Collectors AB, Fiskaregatan 11, S-87133 Harnosand, Sweden
[4] Eastern Switzerland Univ Appl Sci, Inst Energy Syst, Werdenbergstr 4, CH-9471 Buchs, Switzerland
关键词
High-temperature heat pump; Parabolic trough collector; Solar fraction; Techno-economic analysis; ENERGY; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.enconman.2022.116623
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Industrial heat production is responsible for around 20% of total greenhouse gas emissions in Europe. To achieve the climate change goals defined in the Paris Climate Agreement, the EU commission has shifted its focus on sustainable means to generate heating. Moreover, global dependencies are leading to a re-organization of natural gas supplies. Therefore, there is a need for less vulnerable and less price-volatile solutions for heating. This paper focuses on two decarbonization technologies for industrial process heat supply: a) electricity-driven steam-generating high-temperature heat pumps (HTHP), a technology that is more efficient than fossil fuel boilers in generating steam, and b) solar parabolic trough collector (PTC), which can produce heat economically and at a minimal carbon footprint compared to other technologies. The main aim of this paper is to evaluate the levelized cost of heat (LCOH) of these technologies to fulfill a comparative techno-economic analysis. A maximum PTC collector's solar fraction limit (SFlimit) is defined to indicate when the LCOH for these two technologies is equal. This allows for distinguishing between the economic stronghold of each technology. The evaluation is carried out through the annual energy simulations using TRNSYS and Excel spreadsheets for HTHPs, while TRNSED and OCTAVE are used for the solar thermal part. Boundary conditions for European geographical constraints have been applied to establish use cases for the analysis. The result shows that the design of a PTC system with optimal SF can reach cost parity with HTHP for most of the analyzed locations. The developed methodology serves as a valuable guide to quickly determine a preferred lower carbon heat solution, thus easing the decision-making for industries.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], TRNSYS TRANS SYST SI
[2]  
[Anonymous], IEA SHC TASK 49 IEA
[3]  
[Anonymous], IRENA REP HIGHL FALL
[4]  
[Anonymous], HOM ANN 48
[5]  
[Anonymous], BIGD WORLDS LARG PAR
[6]  
[Anonymous], HEAT COOL
[7]  
[Anonymous], IEA SHC TASK 64 SOL
[8]  
[Anonymous], STAND COMPR KOBELCO
[9]  
[Anonymous], HTHP S 2022
[10]  
[Anonymous], ART EHPA