Building organisational resilience capability in small and medium-sized enterprises: The role of high-performance work systems

被引:25
作者
Zhou, Qin [1 ]
Edafioghor, Tinkuma Ejovi [2 ]
Wu, Chia-Huei [1 ,3 ]
Doherty, Bob [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leeds, Business Sch, Maurice Keyworth Bldg, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ West England, Bristol, Avon, England
[3] China Med Univ, China Med Univ Hosp, Dept Med Res, Taichung, Taiwan
[4] Univ York, Sch Business & Soc, York, N Yorkshire, England
关键词
high-performance work systems; human capital heterogeneity; human capital value; Organisational resilience; SMEs; HUMAN-RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; FIRM PERFORMANCE; THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVES; LABOR PRODUCTIVITY; FLEXIBILITY; SMES; AMBIDEXTERITY; CAPACITY; FIT; ARCHITECTURE;
D O I
10.1111/1748-8583.12479
中图分类号
F24 [劳动经济];
学科分类号
020106 ; 020207 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Although organisational resilience is crucial to small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in turbulent business environments, research has yet to establish whether and how human resource management (HRM) systems can help build an SME's organisational resilience to influence firm performance. Drawing on the perspective of HRM as an internal capability builder and human capital resource theory, we develop a model that depicts how high-performance work systems (HPWSs) build organisational resilience capabilities in the forms of bounce-back and bounce-forward resilience, leading to firm performance. We test our model using data from 1140 participants (including top management team members, middle-level managers, and entry-level employees) from 177 Nigerian SMEs. The structural equation modelling results show that HPWSs contribute to bounce-back resilience via human capital value but to bounce-forward resilience via both human capital value and heterogeneity. We also find that bounce-forward resilience is related to firm performance but bounce-back resilience is not.
引用
收藏
页码:806 / 827
页数:22
相关论文
共 100 条
[51]   The Resource-Based View: A Review and Assessment of Its Critiques [J].
Kraaijenbrink, Jeroen ;
Spender, J. -C. ;
Groen, Aard J. .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2010, 36 (01) :349-372
[52]   Adaptive fit versus robust transformation: How organizations respond to environmental change [J].
Lengnick-Hall, CA ;
Beck, TE .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2005, 31 (05) :738-757
[53]   Developing a capacity for organizational resilience through strategic human resource management [J].
Lengnick-Hall, Cynthia A. ;
Beck, Tammy E. ;
Lengnick-Hall, Mark L. .
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2011, 21 (03) :243-255
[54]   The human resource architecture: Toward a theory of human capital allocation and development [J].
Lepak, DP ;
Snell, SA .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1999, 24 (01) :31-48
[55]   Examining the human resource architecture: The relationships among human capital, employment, and human resource configurations [J].
Lepak, DP ;
Snell, SA .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2002, 28 (04) :517-543
[56]   Employment flexibility and firm performance: Examining the interaction effects of employment mode, environmental dynamism, and technological intensity [J].
Lepak, DP ;
Takeuchi, R ;
Snell, SA .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2003, 29 (05) :681-703
[57]   Resilience in Business and Management Research: A Review of Influential Publications and a Research Agenda [J].
Linnenluecke, Martina K. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWS, 2017, 19 (01) :4-30
[58]   Ambidexterity and performance in small- to medium-sized firms: The pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration [J].
Lubatkin, Michael H. ;
Simsek, Zeki ;
Ling, Yan ;
Veiga, John F. .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2006, 32 (05) :646-672
[59]   Positive organizational behavior: Developing and managing psychological strengths [J].
Luthans, F .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT EXECUTIVE, 2002, 16 (01) :57-72
[60]  
McMahan GC, 1999, RES PERS H, P99