Ecotourism branding in protected areas of Iran: Using an efficient hybrid multi-criteria decision-making method model

被引:4
|
作者
Tajer, Elnaz [1 ]
Demir, Sara [1 ]
机构
[1] Bursa Tech Univ, Fac Forestry, Dept Landscape Architecture, Bursa, Turkiye
关键词
Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP); Best and Worst Method (BWM); ecotourism branding of protected areas; hybrid multi-criteria decision-making method (MCDM); Iran; quantitative SWOT analysis; NATIONAL-PARK DJERDAP; SWOT; PRIORITIZATION; TOURISM; STRATEGIES; FRAMEWORK; ANP;
D O I
10.1002/jtr.2639
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Ecotourism, as a nature-based sustainable tourism, raises awareness about the protection of natural and cultural landscape values. This study aims to determine the ecotourism criteria to develop strategies for a sustainable ecotourism branding in Golestan, located in the northeast of Iran. To reach this aim, Strengths-Weaknesses-Opportunities-Threats (SWOT) analysis, multi-criteria decision-making methods consisting of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), and Best and Worst Method (BWM) were integrated. The most appropriate ecotourism strategies for the branding of the study area were ranked according to their priorities. The results of this study reveal that among the 5 main and 20 sub ecotourism criteria, "having natural protected areas," which is an opportunity, and "having ecological values," which is a strength, were determined as the highest priority strategies for ecotourism branding. The methods and results of this quantitative-based research present an exemplary hybrid model that prioritizes the strategies required for branding ecotourism in similar protected areas.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The multi-criteria group decision-making FlowSort method using the output aggregation
    Remadi, Fedia Daami
    Frikha, Hela Moalla
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (04) : 277 - 295
  • [32] A Novel Hybrid Multi-criteria Decision-Making Model to Solve UA-FLP
    Garcia-Hernandez, Laura
    Salas-Morera, L.
    Pierreval, H.
    Arauzo-Azofra, Antonio
    DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2019, 800 : 292 - 299
  • [33] A Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model for Evaluating Companies' Green Credit Rating
    Yang, Chia-Chen
    Ou, Shang-Ling
    Hsu, Li-Chang
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (06)
  • [34] THE MOMENT INTEGRATED SOLUTION METHOD IN MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING
    Akan, Ercan
    Bayar, Sibel
    Elmas, Guldem
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING-THEORY APPLICATIONS AND PRACTICE, 2020, 27 (06): : 844 - 866
  • [35] APPLICATIONS OF WASPAS METHOD AS A MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING TOOL
    Chakraborty, Shankar
    Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras
    Antucheviciene, Jurgita
    ECONOMIC COMPUTATION AND ECONOMIC CYBERNETICS STUDIES AND RESEARCH, 2015, 49 (01): : 5 - 22
  • [36] Multi-criteria decision-making model for wastewater reuse application: a case study from Iran
    Hadipour, Abouzar
    Rajaee, Taher
    Hadipour, Vahid
    Seidirad, Sara
    DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2016, 57 (30) : 13857 - 13864
  • [37] An Efficient Ensemble VTOPES Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model for Sustainable Sugarcane Farms
    Deepa, N.
    Vincent, Durai Raj P. M.
    Kumar, Senthil N.
    Srinivasan, Kathiravan
    Chang, Chuan-Yu
    Bashir, Ali Kashif
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (16)
  • [38] Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method
    Rezaei, Jafar
    OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2015, 53 : 49 - 57
  • [39] Optimization of the number of components in the mixed model using multi-criteria decision-making
    Wang, Jixin
    Wang, Zhenyu
    Yang, Chao
    Wang, Naixiang
    Yu, Xiangjun
    APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2012, 36 (09) : 4227 - 4240
  • [40] A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model for trigeneration system
    Wang, Jiang-Jiang
    Jing, You-Yin
    Zhang, Chun-Fa
    Shi, Guo-Hua
    Zhang, Xu-Tao
    ENERGY POLICY, 2008, 36 (10) : 3823 - 3832