Rhinoplasty and YouTube: A Cross-Sectional Study to Assess the Quality, Dependability, and Reliability of Videos on Rhinoplasty

被引:0
|
作者
Djahanshahi, Nadia [1 ]
Patel, Keval B. [2 ]
Popoola-Samuel, Helen A. O. [3 ]
Fayyaz, Faris [4 ]
Akash, R. [5 ]
机构
[1] St George Univ, Surg, True Blue, Grenada
[2] Narendra Modi Med Coll, Surg, Ahmadabad, India
[3] Rush Univ, Coll Hlth & Sci, Neurol, Chicago, IL USA
[4] Dow Univ Hlth Sci, Surg, Karachi, Pakistan
[5] Jagadguru Jayadeva Murugarajendra JJM Med Coll, Internal Med, Davangere, India
关键词
rhinoplasty journey; rhinoplasty before and after; surgery; rhinoplasty; youtube; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.44804
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Rhinoplasty, also referred to as a nose job or a reconstruction of the nose, is a surgical procedure that alters and reconstructs the nose for aesthetic or functional purposes. With the emergence of social media and modern internet accessibility, YouTube has gained popularity among users of all ages. Despite this, the accuracy and credibility of these videos and the information they include could be cause for concern.Aims: This study intends to assess the competence, quality, and dependability of the information in the videos related to "Rhinoplasty surgery" on YouTube.Methodology: This is a cross-sectional observational study that analyzes rhinoplasty information on YouTube. A Google Forms questionnaire was used to collect the data. The Global Quality Score (GQS), reliability score, and Video Power Index (VPI) were used to assess quality and reliability, and statistical analysis was performed using IBM Corp. Released 2012. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 21.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp. The inclusion criteria were videos ranging from 1 minute to 20 minutes in duration, pertinent to the topic of rhinoplasty surgery, and in either English or Hindi.Results: A total of 71 videos were analyzed, and 70 videos were included. A comparison of GQS, reliability score, and VPI based on the type of uploader was done by the Kruskal-Wallis test. The association between VPI, GQS, and reliability score with that of the uploader of the video was found to be statistically insignificant (p<0.05). Videos uploaded by healthcare organizations, news outlets, patients, or other relevant groups have the most GQS (4.5), whereas videos uploaded by hospitals have the lowest. Conclusions: Compared to the type of uploader, videos have no statistically significant changes in quality, reliability, or video power, implying that the type of uploader does not necessarily impact the overall quality or reliability of the information presented in the investigated YouTube videos. While the majority of the videos addressed the indications of rhinoplasty and provided information about the etiology, there were gaps in discussing pre-procedural investigations and preventive measures. Due to our limitations, expanding the number of accounts used for search and increasing the number of videos might overcome the search algorithm.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Quality and reliability of YouTube videos for hand surgery training
    Savran, Suleyman
    Albayati, Abbas
    Ozkan, Burak
    Uysal, Cagri A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2023, 46 (01) : 99 - 103
  • [42] Quality and Reliability of YouTube Videos on Uterine Fibroid Embolization
    Gad, Bishoy
    Shanmugasundaram, Srinidhi
    Kumar, Abhishek
    Shukla, Pratik
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 19 (07) : 905 - 912
  • [43] A Quality and Reliability Analysis of Geriatric Exercise Videos on YouTube
    Ortanca, Burcu
    Saricimen, Gizem
    Bakilan, Fulya
    Armagan, Onur
    Bal, Cengiz
    TURK OSTEOPOROZ DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF OSTEOPOROSIS, 2024, 30 (02): : 109 - 114
  • [44] TikTok Videos Related to Rhinoplasty in China: Characteristics and the Quality of the Information
    Chen, Kai
    Cai, Yuan
    Jiang, Luyun
    AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2024, 48 (16) : 3091 - 3097
  • [45] A cross-sectional study of YouTube videos as a source of patient information about topical psoriasis therapies
    Pithadia, Deeti J.
    Reynolds, Kelly A.
    Lee, Erica B.
    Wu, Jashin J.
    JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGICAL TREATMENT, 2020, 31 (04) : 366 - 369
  • [46] Assessment of the quality, content, and reliability of YouTube® videos on diabetes mellitus and polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review with cross-sectional analysis comparing peer-reviewed videos
    Baig, Shams Ali
    Malhotra, Kashish
    Banerjee, Anagh Josh
    Kowsik, Mukunth
    Kumar, Khushi
    Rahman, Fazna
    Batul, Syeda Sabbah
    Saiyed, Mohammed Faraaz
    Venkatesh, Vardhan
    Iyer, Pranav Viswanath
    Kempegowda, Punith
    ENDOCRINE CONNECTIONS, 2024, 13 (07)
  • [47] Quality of Internet Videos Related to Pediatric Urology in Mainland China: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Bai, Gaochen
    Fu, Kai
    Fu, Wen
    Liu, Guochang
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 10
  • [48] A cross-sectional descriptive analysis of portrayal of autism spectrum disorders in YouTube videos: A short report
    Bellon-Harn, Monica L.
    Manchaiah, Vinaya
    Morris, Lekeitha R.
    AUTISM, 2020, 24 (01) : 263 - 268
  • [49] Is YouTube a Reliable and Quality Source on Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery? A Cross-Sectional Study
    Korkmaz, Murat
    Altin, Yekta Furkan
    Yagci, Taha Furkan
    Korkmaz, Merve Damla
    Akgul, Turgut
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 187 : E181 - E188
  • [50] Popular videos related to low back pain on YouTube™ do not reflect current clinical guidelines: a cross-sectional study
    Maia, Laisa B.
    Silva, Juliana P.
    Souza, Mateus B.
    Henschke, Nicholas
    Oliveira, Vinicius C.
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2021, 25 (06) : 803 - 810