Enhancing risk assessment: an improved Bayesian network approach for analyzing interactions among risks

被引:2
作者
Madihi, Mohammad Hosein [1 ]
Javid, Ali Akbar Shirzadi [1 ]
Nasirzadeh, Farnad [2 ]
机构
[1] Iran Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Civil Engn, Tehran, Iran
[2] Deakin Univ, Sch Architecture & Built Environm, Fac Sci Engn & Built Environm, Geelong Waterfront Campus, Geelong, Vic, Australia
关键词
Risk assessment; Cost overrun; Bayesian belief network; DEMATEL; ISM; MANAGEMENT-PRACTICES; BELIEF NETWORKS; MODEL; DEMATEL; FUZZY; ISM;
D O I
10.1108/ECAM-07-2023-0774
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
PurposeIn traditional Bayesian belief networks (BBNs), a large amount of data are required to complete network parameters, which makes it impractical. In addition, no systematic method has been used to create the structure of the BBN. The aims of this study are to: (1) decrease the number of questions and time and effort required for completing the parameters of the BBN and (2) present a simple and apprehensible method for creating the BBN structure based on the expert knowledge.Design/methodology/approachIn this study, by combining the decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL), interpretive structural modeling (ISM) and BBN, a model is introduced that can form the project risk network and analyze the impact of risk factors on project cost quantitatively based on the expert knowledge. The ranked node method (RNM) is then used to complete the parametric part of the BBN using the same data obtained from the experts to analyze DEMATEL.FindingsCompared to the traditional BBN, the proposed method will significantly reduce the time and effort required to elicit network parameters and makes it easy to create a BBN structure. The results obtained from the implementation of the model on a mass housing project showed that considering the identified risk factors, the cost overruns relating to material, equipment, workforce and overhead cost were 37.6, 39.5, 42 and 40.1%, respectively.Research limitations/implicationsCompared to the traditional BBN, the proposed method will significantly reduce the time and effort required to elicit network parameters and makes it easy to create a BBN structure. The results obtained from the implementation of the model on a mass housing project showed that considering the identified risk factors, the cost overruns relating to material, equipment, workforce and overhead cost were 37.6, 39.5, 42 and 40.1%, respectively. The obtained results are based on a single case study project and may not be readily generalizable.Originality/valueThe presented framework makes the BBN more practical for quantitatively assessing the impact of risk on project costs. This helps to manage financial issues, which is one of the main reasons for project bankruptcy.
引用
收藏
页码:2022 / 2043
页数:22
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   A review of artificial intelligence based risk assessment methods for capturing complexity-risk interdependencies Cost overrun in construction projects [J].
Afzal, Farman ;
Shao Yunfei ;
Nazir, Mubasher ;
Bhatti, Saad Mahmood .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGING PROJECTS IN BUSINESS, 2021, 14 (02) :300-328
[2]   Integrated priority decision index for risk assessment in chaos: cost overruns in transport projects [J].
Afzal, Farman ;
Shao, Yunfei ;
Sajid, Muhammad ;
Afzal, Fahim .
ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECTURAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 27 (04) :825-849
[3]   Understanding influential factors on implementing green supply chain management practices: An interpretive structural modelling analysis [J].
Agi, Maher A. N. ;
Nishant, Rohit .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2017, 188 :351-363
[4]  
Ahadzie D. K., 2008, International Journal of Project Management, V26, P675, DOI 10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.09.006
[5]   Causes of cost overruns in building construction projects in Asian countries; Iran as a case study [J].
Amini, Shima ;
Rezvani, Alireza ;
Tabassi, Mohsen ;
Sadati, Seyed Saeed Malek .
ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECTURAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 30 (07) :2739-2766
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2013, GUIDE PROJECT MANAGE, V5
[7]   An Analytical Network Process model for risks prioritisation in megaprojects [J].
Boateng, Prince ;
Chen, Zhen ;
Ogunlana, Stephen O. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2015, 33 (08) :1795-1811
[8]   Risk analysis of public-private partnership waste-to-energy incineration projects in China: a hybrid fuzzy DEMATEL-ISM approach [J].
Cheng, Min ;
Liu, Lin ;
Cheng, Xiaotong ;
Tao, Li .
ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECTURAL MANAGEMENT, 2024, 31 (11) :4255-4280
[9]   Identification of Risk Paths in International Construction Projects Using Structural Equation Modeling [J].
Eybpoosh, Matineh ;
Dikmen, Irem ;
Birgonul, M. Talat .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2011, 137 (12) :1164-1175
[10]   A simulation-based risk network model for decision support in project risk management [J].
Fang, Chao ;
Marle, Franck .
DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2012, 52 (03) :635-644