Toward green steel: Modeling and environmental economic analysis of iron direct reduction with different reducing gases

被引:11
作者
Trinca, Antonio [1 ]
Patrizi, Daniele [1 ]
Verdone, Nicola [1 ]
Bassano, Claudia [2 ]
Vilardi, Giorgio [1 ]
机构
[1] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Chem Engn Mat Environm, Via Eudossiana 18, I-00184 Rome, Italy
[2] Italian Agcy New Technol Energy & Sustainable Econ, ENEA, Via Anguillarese 301, I-00123 Rome, Italy
关键词
Decarbonization; Hydrogen; Electrolysis; MSW gasification; Process simulation; Carbon capture; CO2; EMISSIONS; FURNACE; MIDREX; TECHNOLOGY; KINETICS; OXIDE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139081
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The objective of the paper is to simulate the whole steelmaking process cycle based on Direct Reduced Iron and Electric Arc Furnace technologies, by modeling for the first time the reduction furnace based on kinetic approach, to be used as a basis for the environmental and techno-economic plant analysis by adopting different reducing gases. In addition, the impact of carbon capture section is discussed. A complete profitability analysis has been conducted for the first time, adopting a Monte Carlo simulation approach. In detail, the use of syngas from methane reforming, syngas and hydrogen from gasification of municipal solid waste, and green hydrogen from water electrolysis are analyzed. The results show that the Direct Reduced Iron process with methane can reduce CO2 emissions by more than half compared to the blast furnace based-cycle, and with the adoption of carbon capture, greenhouse gas emissions can be reduced by an additional 40%. The use of carbon capture by amine scrubbing has a limited economic disadvantage compared to the scenario without it, becoming profitable once carbon tax is included in the analysis. However, it is with the use of green hydrogen from electrolyzer that greenhouse gas emissions can be cut down almost completely. To have an environmental benefit compared with the methane-based Direct Reduced Iron process, the green hydrogen plant must operate for at least 5136 h per year (64.2% of the plant's annual operating hours) on renewable energy. In addition, the use of syngas and separated hydrogen from municipal solid waste gasification is evaluated, demonstrating its possible use with no negative effects on the quality of produced steel. The results show that hydrogen use from waste gasification is more economic with respect to green hydrogen from electrolysis, but from the environmental viewpoint the latter results the best alternative. Comparing the use of hydrogen and syngas from waste gasification, it can be stated that the use of the former reducing gas results preferable, from both the economic and environmental viewpoint.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 5 条
  • [1] Decarbonization of the Iron and Steel Industry with Direct Reduction of Iron Ore with Green Hydrogen
    Bhaskar, Abhinav
    Assadi, Mohsen
    Somehsaraei, Homam Nikpey
    ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (03)
  • [2] Cost and Life Cycle Analysis for Deep CO2 Emissions Reduction for Steel Making: Direct Reduced Iron Technologies
    Zang, Guiyan
    Sun, Pingping
    Elgowainy, Amgad
    Bobba, Pallavi
    McMillan, Colin
    Ma, Ookie
    Podkaminer, Kara
    Rustagi, Neha
    Melaina, Marc
    Koleva, Mariya
    STEEL RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 94 (06)
  • [3] Insights into direct reduction iron using bamboo biomass as a green and renewable reducer: Reduction behavior study and kinetics analysis
    Cao, Zeshui
    Xu, Qiang
    Kang, Haopeng
    Shi, Jian
    Lu, Xuyang
    Chen, Bin
    Guo, Liejin
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 880
  • [4] Toward a green steel production powered by a hybrid renewable energy system: Techno-economic and environmental assessment
    Nasseriyan, Pouriya
    Jafari, Saeed
    Khajehpour, Hossein
    Edalati, Saeed
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 332
  • [5] Direct reduction of iron to facilitate net zero emissions in the steel industry: A review of research progress at different scales
    Ling, Junhao
    Yang, Haitao
    Tian, Guocai
    Cheng, Jiaxin
    Wang, Xin
    Yu, Xiaohua
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 441