Semi-quantitative risk assessment for workers exposed to occupational harmful agents in an oilfield in Iran

被引:2
作者
Askari, Ali [1 ,2 ]
Poursadeqiyan, Mohsen [3 ]
Abadi, Ali Salehi Sahl [4 ]
Mahdinasab, Laila [5 ]
Farhadi, Ali Reza [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Occupat Hlth Engn, Tehran, Iran
[2] Azar Oilfield, OICO Occupat Hlth Div, Dept Hlth Safety & Environm, Ilam, Iran
[3] Ardabil Univ Med Sci, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Occupat Hlth Engn, Ardebil, Iran
[4] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Sch Publ Hlth & Safety, Dept Occupat Hlth & Safety Work, Workplace Hlth Promot Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
[5] Mehran Educ Off, Work & Educ Sch, Dept Work & Knowledge, Ilam, Iran
[6] Kermanshah Univ Med Sci, Dept Med Educ, Kermanshah, Iran
来源
WORK-A JOURNAL OF PREVENTION ASSESSMENT & REHABILITATION | 2023年 / 76卷 / 01期
关键词
Workplace; health priorities; decision making; health planning; HEALTH; HAZARDS;
D O I
10.3233/WOR-220077
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Workers are exposed to occupational health hazards from physical, chemical, biological, ergonomic, and psychological agents. Assessing occupational health risks is vital for executing control measures to protect employees' health against harmful occupational agents. OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to identify, evaluate, and prioritize occupational health risks to assist senior management in determining where to allocate the budget to carry out the required corrective actions in the oilfields project. METHODS: This descriptive-analytical cross-sectional study was performed in 2021 among Iran's Sarvak Azar oil field job groups. The occupational health risk was assessed using the Harmful Agents Risk Priority Index (HARPI) as a semiquantitative method. Then, to simplify decision-making and budget allocation, we reported HARPI final score in the Pareto principle format. RESULTS: The results show that in this oil field, controlling exposure to adverse lighting, improving the thermal conditions and ergonomics, and preventing noise exposure has the highest priority, with scores of 6342, 5269, 5629, and 5050, respectively. Production, HSE, laboratory, and commissioning need the most health care measures with scores of 8683, 5815, 5394, and 4060, respectively. CONCLUSION: HARPI could be used to prioritize occupational health hazards, and this method can simplify managers' decisions to allocate resources to implement control measures.
引用
收藏
页码:147 / 157
页数:11
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Leading Indicators in Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems in Healthcare A Quasi-Experimental Longitudinal Study
    Almost, Joan
    Tett, Louise Caicco
    VanDenKerkhof, Elizabeth
    Pare, Genevieve
    Strahlendorf, Peter
    Noonan, Joanna
    Hayes, Thomas
    Van Hulle, Henrietta
    Holden, Jeremy
    Silva e Silva, Vanessa
    Rochon, Andrea
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2019, 61 (12) : E486 - E496
  • [2] Askari A, Prioritizing and Providing Sound Pollution Control Strategies at the CPF of North Azadegan Oilfield Project
  • [3] Askari A, Journal of Occupational Hygiene Engineering, P43
  • [4] Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation
    Aven, Terje
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2016, 253 (01) : 1 - 13
  • [5] Benbenishty R, Decision making in child protection
  • [6] COST-BENEFITS ASPECTS IN RISK MANAGEMENT
    Bialas, A.
    [J]. POLISH JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2016, 14 (01): : 28 - 39
  • [7] Stability and reproducibility of semi-quantitative risk assessment methods within the occupational health and safety scope
    Carvalho, F.
    Melo, R. B.
    [J]. WORK-A JOURNAL OF PREVENTION ASSESSMENT & REHABILITATION, 2015, 51 (03): : 591 - 600
  • [8] Duplakova D, 2022, Implementation of Digital Ergonomic Tools during the Flexible Screening of Lighting in the Working Environment
  • [9] A review of occupational health and safety risk assessment approaches based on multi-criteria decision-making methods and their fuzzy versions
    Gul, Muhammet
    [J]. HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, 2018, 24 (07): : 1723 - 1760
  • [10] ILO, 2015, ILC 104/2015