An approach for assessing industrial IoT data sources to determine their data trustworthiness

被引:6
作者
Foidl, Harald [1 ,2 ]
Felderer, Michael [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Innsbruck, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
[2] Kontron Austria GmbH, A-4209 Engerwitzdorf, Austria
[3] German Aerosp Ctr DLR, Inst Software Technol, D-51147 Cologne, Germany
[4] Univ Cologne, D-50923 Cologne, Germany
关键词
Data trustworthiness; Data source assessment; Industrial Internet of Things; DATA QUALITY; ANALYTICS; INTERNET;
D O I
10.1016/j.iot.2023.100735
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Trustworthy data in the Industrial Internet of Things are paramount to ensure correct strategic decision-making and accurate actions on the shop floor. However, the enormous amount of industrial data generated by a variety of sources (e.g. machines and sensors) is often of poor quality (e.g. unreliable sensor readings). Research suggests that certain characteristics of data sources (e.g. battery-powered power supply and wireless communication) contribute to this poor data quality. Nonetheless, to date, much of the research on data trustworthiness has only focused on data values to determine trustworthiness. Consequently, we propose to pay more attention to the characteristics of data sources in the context of data trustworthiness. Thus, this article presents an approach for assessing Industrial Internet of Things data sources to determine their data trustworthiness. The approach is based on a meta-model decomposing data sources into data stores (e.g. databases) and providers (e.g. sensors). Furthermore, the approach provides a quality model comprising quality-related characteristics of data stores to determine their data trustworthiness. Moreover, a catalogue containing properties of data providers is presented to infer the trustworthiness of their provided data. An industrial case study revealed a moderate correlation between the data source assessments of the proposed approach and experts.
引用
收藏
页数:33
相关论文
共 81 条
[1]  
Aggarwal CC., 2013, Managing and Mining Sensor Data, P383, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-6309-2_12
[2]   Database Design Debts through Examining Schema Evolution [J].
Al-Barak, Mashel ;
Bahsoon, Rami .
2016 IEEE 8TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON MANAGING TECHNICAL DEBT (MTD), 2016, :17-23
[3]  
Alexakos C., 2019, 2019 FIRST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOCIETAL AUTOMATION (SA)
[4]  
Alvaro A., 2005, 10 WCOP19TH ECCOP, P31
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2019, The Industrial Internet of Things Volume G1: Reference Architecture
[6]  
[Anonymous], Quality model overview and usage
[7]   From Trustworthy Data to Trustworthy IoT: A Data Collection Methodology Based on Blockchain [J].
Ardagna, Claudio A. ;
Asal, Rasool ;
Damiani, Ernesto ;
El Ioini, Nabil ;
Elahi, Mehdi ;
Pahl, Claus .
ACM TRANSACTIONS ON CYBER-PHYSICAL SYSTEMS, 2021, 5 (01)
[8]   Methodologies for Data Quality Assessment and Improvement [J].
Batini, Carlo ;
Cappiello, Cinzia ;
Francalanci, Chiara ;
Maurino, Andrea .
ACM COMPUTING SURVEYS, 2009, 41 (03)
[9]   Data Trustworthiness-Approaches and Research Challenges [J].
Bertino, Elisa .
DATA PRIVACY MANAGEMENT, AUTONOMOUS SPONTANEOUS SECURITY, AND SECURITY ASSURANCE, 2015, 8872 :17-25
[10]   The industrial internet of things (IIoT): An analysis framework [J].
Boyes, Hugh ;
Hallaq, Bit ;
Cunningham, Joe ;
Watson, Tim .
COMPUTERS IN INDUSTRY, 2018, 101 :1-12