Custom Triflange Acetabular Implants: Average 10-Year Follow-Up

被引:7
|
作者
Meding, John B. [1 ]
Meding, Lindsey K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Hip & Knee Surg, 1199 Hadley Rd, Mooresville, IN 46158 USA
关键词
triflange acetabular implants; revision total hip arthroplasty; acetabular bone loss; pelvic discontinuity; Paprosky 3A and 3B; TOTAL HIP-ARTHROPLASTY; PELVIC DISCONTINUITY; BONE LOSS; COMPONENTS; RECONSTRUCTION; MANAGEMENT; FIXATION; DEFECTS; CAGES;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2023.03.035
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Acetabular reconstruction options in the setting of substantial bone deficiency (Paprosky 3A and 3B) remain limited. Custom triflange acetabular implants are one choice for this challenging problem. However, few studies have reported on survivorship beyond 3 to 5 years. The purpose of this study was to report our 6 to 13-year clinical results using these custom-made acetabular components. Methods: Between 2008 and March 2015, 42 revision total hip arthroplasties (41 patients) were performed at our institution with a custom triflange acetabular component. All revisions involved either Paprosky 3A or 3B acetabular defects. Two patients died before the five-year follow-up. Harris Hip Scores were obtained at 6 months, 1 year, and every 2 to 3 years thereafter. The average follow-up in the remaining 40 revision total hip arthroplasties was 10 years (range, 6 to 13 years). Results: At the final follow-up, the mean Harris score was 74 points. There were two deep infections (5%). One custom implant was removed for deep infection (2.5%). Three hips (7.5%) experienced a total of four dislocations necessitating revision in one hip (femoral component only). One custom implant was judged to be loose. There were no cases of femoral nerve palsy. At final follow-up, 38 (95%) of the custom acetabular implants were considered radiographically stable. Conclusion: Instability and infection remain a major concern and cause of failure in these complex reconstructions. At an average follow-up of 10 years, however, custom triflange acetabular implants appear to work at least as well as jumbo cups and cup/cage constructs in the setting of extensive erosion of acetabular bone. (c) 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:S201 / S205
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Custom Triflange Acetabular Components for Large Acetabular Defects: Minimum 10-Year Follow-up
    Moore, K. David
    McClenny, Michelle D.
    Wills, Bradley W.
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2018, 41 (03) : E316 - E320
  • [2] Custom Triflange Acetabular Implants for Complex Hip Revisions: A Case Series
    Hameed, Daniel
    Krebs, Viktor
    Dubin, Jeremy A.
    Piuzzi, Nicolas S.
    Pasqualini, Ignacio
    Mont, Michael A.
    SURGICAL TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL-INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENTS IN SURGERY AND SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2024, 44
  • [3] Acetabular Augments Used in Revision Hip Arthroplasty: Minimum 10-year Follow-Up of Implant Survivorships, Functional Scores, and Radiographic Outcomes
    Braunstein, Doris
    Greenberg, Arieh
    Chaudhry, Faran
    Daud, Anser
    Sa, Oleg A.
    Gross, Allan E.
    Kuzyk, Paul R.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2025, 40 (03) : 751 - 757
  • [4] A Minimum of 10-Year Follow-Up of the Burch-Schneider Cage and Bulk Allografts for the Revision of Pelvic Discontinuity
    Regis, Dario
    Sandri, Andrea
    Bonetti, Ingrid
    Bortolami, Oscar
    Bartolozzi, Pietro
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2012, 27 (06) : 1057 - 1063
  • [5] Acetabular Distraction Technique: A Multicenter Study With a Minimum 2-Year Radiographic Follow-Up
    Melnic, Christopher M.
    Salimy, Mehdi S.
    Minutillo, Gregory T.
    Paprosky, Wayne G.
    Sheth, Neil P.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2024, 39 (09) : S398 - S403
  • [6] Acetabular revision arthroplasty using press-fitted jumbo cups: an average 10-year follow-up study
    Moon, Jun-Ki
    Ryu, Jaejoon
    Kim, Yeesuk
    Yang, Jae-Hyuk
    Hwang, Kyu-Tae
    Kim, Young-Ho
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2019, 139 (08) : 1149 - 1160
  • [7] The use of an Ossis custom 3D-printed tri-flanged acetabular implant for major bone loss: minimum 2-year follow-up
    Kieser, David C.
    Ailabouni, Ramez
    Kieser, Sandra C. J.
    Wyatt, Michael C.
    Armour, Paul C.
    Coates, Mark H.
    Hooper, Gary J.
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 28 (06) : 668 - 674
  • [8] Bridging Massive Acetabular Defects With the Triflange Cup: 10-to 28-Year Results
    Christie, Matthew C.
    Deboer, David K.
    Morrison, Jefferson C.
    Brinson, Martha F.
    Christie, Michael J.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2023, 38 (11) : 2423 - 2428
  • [9] Acetabular Reconstruction with the Burch-Schneider Antiprotrusio Cage and Bulk Allografts: Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up Results
    Regis, Dario
    Sandri, Andrea
    Bonetti, Ingrid
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 2014
  • [10] Acetabular reinforcement ring in primary total hip arthroplasty: a minimum 10-year follow-up
    Sadri, Hassan
    Pfander, Gregoire
    Siebenrock, Klaus-Arno
    Tannast, Moritz
    Koch, Peter
    Fujita, Hiroshi
    Ballmer, Peter
    Ganz, Reinhold
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2008, 128 (08) : 869 - 877