Uncertainty Quantification in Tomographic Inversion of Near-Surface Seismic Refraction Data

被引:0
|
作者
Li, Ang [1 ]
Grana, Dario [1 ]
Parsekian, Andrew D. [1 ,2 ]
Carr, Brad [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wyoming, Dept Geol & Geophys, Laramie, WY 82071 USA
[2] Univ Wyoming, Dept Civil Architectural Engn & Construct Manageme, Laramie, WY USA
关键词
Seismic refraction; Seismic inversion; Stochastic methods; Uncertainty quantification; Rock properties; Near-surface geophysics; CRITICAL ZONE ARCHITECTURE; TRAVEL-TIME TOMOGRAPHY; WAVE-FORM INVERSION; DEEP CRITICAL ZONE; WATER; CONSTRAINTS; POROSITY;
D O I
10.1007/s11004-023-10083-9
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Understanding the near-surface structure of the Earth requires accurate prediction of physical properties of the subsurface, such as velocity estimated from tomographic inversion of seismic refraction data. The predicted velocity values are often uncertain due to epistemic uncertainty in the inversion process (i.e., imperfectly known underlying physics) and aleatoric variability in the data (i.e., inherent noise in observations). Although seismic refraction is widely used in near-surface applications, the associated uncertainty is rarely quantified and presented alongside the inverted velocity tomograms. In this study, the effect of epistemic uncertainty due to local variability in the initial model and aleatoric variability due to first-arrival picking error on the velocity prediction uncertainty are investigated. A stochastic framework is implemented based on a statistical approach where multiple realizations of stochastically perturbed initial models and travel time picks are generated and the uncertainty in the predicted velocity models is quantified. The two sources of uncertainty are first studied independently and then the combined effect is investigated. The results show that both sources affect the posterior uncertainty, but the uncertainty in the initial model has a greater effect than picking error on the uncertainty of the posterior velocity model. In addition, joint analysis of both sources of uncertainty shows that the uncertainty in the inverted model depends on predicted velocity values, depths, velocity gradients and ray coverages.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 101
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] SHEAR-WAVE DETECTION IN NEAR-SURFACE SEISMIC REFRACTION STUDIES
    WHITCOMB, JH
    GEOPHYSICS, 1966, 31 (05) : 981 - &
  • [22] Near-Surface Correction on Seismic and Gravity Data
    Bychkov, S.
    Mityunina, I. Y.
    JOURNAL OF EARTH SCIENCE, 2015, 26 (06) : 851 - 857
  • [23] SHALLOW SEISMIC REFRACTION SURVEY OF NEAR-SURFACE GROUNDWATER-FLOW
    SVERDRUP, KA
    GROUND WATER MONITORING AND REMEDIATION, 1986, 6 (01): : 80 - 83
  • [24] Near-Surface Correction on Seismic and Gravity Data
    S.Bychkov
    I.Y.Mityunina
    Journal of Earth Science, 2015, 26 (06) : 851 - 857
  • [25] Near-Surface Correction on Seismic and Gravity Data
    S.Bychkov
    I.Y.Mityunina
    Journal of Earth Science, 2015, (06) : 851 - 857
  • [26] Near-surface correction on seismic and gravity data
    S. Bychkov
    I. Y. Mityunina
    Journal of Earth Science, 2015, 26 : 851 - 857
  • [27] A comparison of phase inversion and traveltime tomography for processing near-surface refraction traveltimes
    Ellefsen, Karl J.
    GEOPHYSICS, 2009, 74 (06) : WCB11 - WCB24
  • [28] Early arrival waveform tomography on near-surface refraction data
    Sheng, Jianming
    Leeds, Alan
    Buddensiek, Maike
    Schuster, Gerard T.
    GEOPHYSICS, 2006, 71 (04) : U47 - U57
  • [29] Near-surface imaging by joint inversion of ERT and seismic traveltime data with guided FCM clustering
    Shi, Zhanjie
    Wang, Chao
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2024, 222
  • [30] An improved diffraction tomographic inversion technique for imaging near-surface buried objects
    Hislop, G
    Tang, T
    ASIA-PACIFIC CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELECTROMAGNETICS, CEEM'2003, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 169 - 172