Long-Term Oncological Outcomes for Histologically Confirmed High-Risk Prostate Cancer

被引:3
作者
Takeda, Hayato [1 ]
Akatsuka, Jun [1 ]
Yuki, Endo [1 ]
Matsuzawa, Ichiro [1 ]
Suzuki, Yasutomo [1 ,2 ]
Hamasaki, Tsutomu [3 ]
Kimura, Go [1 ]
Kondo, Yukihiro [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Nippon Med Sch, Dept Urol, Tokyo, Japan
[2] Chiba Hokusoh Hosp, Nippon Med Sch, Dept Urol, Chiba, Japan
[3] Musashi Kosugi Hosp, Nippon Med Sch, Dept Urol, Kanagawa, Japan
[4] Nippon Med Sch, Dept Urol, 1-1-5 Sendagi Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 1138603, Japan
关键词
prostate cancer; high risk; prostatectomy; ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; GLEASON SCORE; NOMOGRAM; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1272/jnms.JNMS.2023_90-210
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The optimal treatment modality for locally advanced prostate cancer has not been estab-lished. Radiotherapy, hormonal therapy, and combination treatments are the main strategies, although the feasibility of radical prostatectomy as a first-line therapy needs to be considered. This retrospective analysis of pathological results of extracted specimens evaluated long-term oncological outcomes for high-risk prostate cancer treated surgically. The association of number of risk factors with long-term outcome was specifically analyzed.Methods: We identified patients with high-risk prostate cancer who underwent laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, without neoadjuvant therapy, at Nippon Medical School from 2000 to 2012. Risk factors were a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentration & GE;20 ng/mL, pathological & GE;T3, and pathological Gleason Score & GE;8. Biological failure was defined as a PSA concentration & GE;0.2 ng/mL.Results: 222 men were identified. One patient had a positive lymph node status, and there was a sig-nificant difference in surgical margin positivity (52 men, 68.4% vs 56 men 38.4%) between patients with and without biochemical failure. Among patients meeting the high-risk criteria with a follow-up of up to 133 months, the biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival rates at 5 and 10 years were 62.8% and 58.4%, respectively, and mean time to BCR was 14.0 months. BCR-free survival rates at 5 and 10 years were 73.6% and 71.4%, respectively, for 1 risk factor, 48.7% and 34.6% for 2 factors, and 34.5% and 34.5% for 3 factors. Patients with a single risk factor had a significantly better outcome than those with multiple risk factors. The overall survival rates at 5 and 10 years were 94.6% and 93.7%, and the cancer -specific survival rate was 100% at both 5 and 10 years.Conclusions: Reasonable long-term oncological outcomes can be achieved by surgical treatment for high-risk prostate cancer. Patients with 1 risk factor had a significantly better BCR-free rate than those with multiple risk factors. (J Nippon Med Sch 2023; 90: 202?209)
引用
收藏
页码:202 / 209
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Neoadjuvant androgen-deprivation therapy with radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer in association with age and serum testosterone
    Akitake, Naoko
    Shiota, Masaki
    Obata, Hirofumi
    Takeuchi, Ario
    Kashiwagi, Eiji
    Imada, Kenjiro
    Kiyoshima, Keijiro
    Inokuchi, Junichi
    Tatsugami, Katsunori
    Eto, Masatoshi
    [J]. PROSTATE INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 6 (03) : 104 - 109
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2016, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Ovarian Cancer Including Fallopian Tube Cancer and Primary Peritoneal Cancer
  • [3] Long-Term Survival After Radical Prostatectomy Versus External-Beam Radiotherapy for Patients With High-Risk Prostate Cancer
    Boorjian, Stephen A.
    Karnes, R. Jeffrey
    Viterbo, Rosalia
    Rangel, Laureano J.
    Bergstralh, Eric J.
    Horwitz, Eric M.
    Blute, Michael L.
    Buyyounouski, Mark K.
    [J]. CANCER, 2011, 117 (13) : 2883 - 2891
  • [4] Updated Nomogram Predicting Lymph Node Invasion in Patients with Prostate Cancer Undergoing Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection: The Essential Importance of Percentage of Positive Cores
    Briganti, Alberto
    Larcher, Alessandro
    Abdollah, Firas
    Capitanio, Umberto
    Gallina, Andrea
    Suardi, Nazareno
    Bianchi, Marco
    Sun, Maxine
    Freschi, Massimo
    Salonia, Andrea
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    Rigatti, Patrizio
    Montorsi, Francesco
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2012, 61 (03) : 480 - 487
  • [5] The Gleason Score of Tumor at the Margin in Radical Prostatectomy is Predictive of Biochemical Recurrence
    Cao, Dengfeng
    Kibel, Adam S.
    Gao, Feng
    Tao, Yu
    Humphrey, Peter A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2010, 34 (07) : 994 - 1001
  • [6] The role of radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer
    Chung, Byung Ha
    [J]. PROSTATE INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 1 (03) : 95 - 101
  • [7] Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation therapy for patients with clinically localized prostate carcinoma in the prostate specific antigen era
    D'Amico, AV
    Whittington, R
    Malkowicz, SB
    Cote, K
    Loffredo, M
    Schultz, D
    Chen, MH
    Tomaszewski, JE
    Renshaw, AA
    Wein, A
    Richie, JP
    [J]. CANCER, 2002, 95 (02) : 281 - 286
  • [8] Poorly differentiated prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy: Long-term outcome and incidence of pathological downgrading
    Donohue, John F.
    Bianco, Fernando J., Jr.
    Kuroiwa, Kentaro
    Vickers, Andrew J.
    Wheeler, Thomas M.
    Scardino, Peter T.
    Reuter, Victor A.
    Eastham, James A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 176 (03) : 991 - 995
  • [9] Oncological outcomes of the prostate cancer patients registered in 2004: Report from the Cancer Registration Committee of the JUA
    Fujimoto, Hiroyuki
    Nakanishi, Hiroyuki
    Miki, Tsuneharu
    Kubota, Yoshinobu
    Takahashi, Satoru
    Suzuki, Kazuhiro
    Kanayama, Hiro-omi
    Mikami, Kazuya
    Homma, Yukio
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 18 (12) : 876 - 881
  • [10] Who is the average patient presenting with prostate cancer?
    Greene, KL
    Cowan, JE
    Cooperberg, MR
    Meng, MV
    DuChane, J
    Carroll, PR
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2005, 66 (5A) : 76 - 82