Environmental contamination with Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile in Vietnam

被引:2
|
作者
Khun, Peng An [1 ]
Phi, Long Duc [2 ]
Bui, Huong Thi Thu [3 ]
Bui, Nguyen Thi [4 ]
Vu, Quyen Thi Huyen [4 ]
Trinh, Luong Duy [4 ]
Collins, Deirdre A. [5 ]
Riley, Thomas, V [1 ,5 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Australia, Sch Biomed Sci, Nedlands, WA 6009, Australia
[2] Thai Binh Univ Med & Pharm, Thai Binh 410000, Vietnam
[3] Thai Binh Gen Hosp, Thai Binh 410000, Vietnam
[4] Ninh Binh Women & Childrens Hosp, Ninh Binh 430000, Vietnam
[5] Edith Cowan Univ, Sch Med & Hlth Sci, Joondalup, WA 6027, Australia
[6] Murdoch Univ, Med Mol & Forens Sci, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia
[7] PathWest Lab Med, Dept Microbiol, Nedlands, WA 6009, Australia
[8] Univ Western Australia, Queen Elizabeth II Med Ctr, Sch Biomed Sci, Nedlands, WA 6009, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile; environment; animals; root vegetables; sources; reservoirs; Vietnam; HIGH PREVALENCE; INFECTION; EPIDEMIOLOGY; PIGS; HUMANS;
D O I
10.1093/jambio/lxad118
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Aims To investigate the prevalence, molecular type, and antimicrobial susceptibility of Clostridioides difficile in the environment in Vietnam, where little is known about C. difficile. Methods and results Samples of pig faeces, soils from pig farms, potatoes, and the hospital environment were cultured for C. difficile. Isolates were identified and typed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) ribotyping. The overall prevalence of C. difficile contamination was 24.5% (68/278). Clostridioides difficile was detected mainly in soils from pig farms and hospital soils, with 70%-100% prevalence. Clostridioides difficile was isolated from 3.4% of pig faecal samples and 5% of potato surfaces. The four most prevalent ribotypes (RTs) were RTs 001, 009, 038, and QX574. All isolates were susceptible to metronidazole, fidaxomicin, vancomycin, and amoxicillin/clavulanate, while resistance to erythromycin, tetracycline, and moxifloxacin was common in toxigenic strains. Clostridioides difficile RTs 001A(+)B(+)CDT(-) and 038A(-)B(-)CDT(-) were predominantly multidrug resistant. Conclusions Environmental sources of C. difficile are important to consider in the epidemiology of C. difficile infection in Vietnam, however, contaminated soils are likely to be the most important source of C. difficile. This poses additional challenges to controlling infections in healthcare settings.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Environmental Interventions to Control Clostridium difficile
    Loo, Vivian G.
    INFECTIOUS DISEASE CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2015, 29 (01) : 83 - +
  • [42] Battling Enteropathogenic Clostridia: Phage Therapy for Clostridioides difficile and Clostridium perfringens
    Venhorst, Jennifer
    van der Vossen, Jos M. B. M.
    Agamennone, Valeria
    FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [43] Genomic survey of Clostridium difficile reservoirs in the East of England implicates environmental contamination of wastewater treatment plants by clinical lineages
    Moradigaravand, Danesh
    Gouliouris, Theodore
    Ludden, Catherine
    Reuter, Sandra
    Jamrozy, Dorota
    Blane, Beth
    Naydenova, Plamena
    Judge, Kim
    Aliyu, Sani H.
    Hadjirin, Nazreen F.
    Holmes, Mark A.
    Torok, Estee
    Brown, Nicholas M.
    Parkhill, Julian
    Peacock, Sharon
    MICROBIAL GENOMICS, 2018, 4 (03):
  • [44] A systematic review and meta-analysis of decontamination methods to prevent hospital environmental contamination and transmission of Clostridioides difficile
    Kato, Hideo
    Hagihara, Mao
    Asai, Nobuhiro
    Shibata, Yuichi
    Yamagishi, Yuka
    Iwamoto, Takuya
    Mikamo, Hiroshige
    ANAEROBE, 2022, 73
  • [45] Risk Factors of Patients With Diarrhea for Having Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile Infection
    Lang, Vanessa
    Gunka, Katrin
    Ortlepp, Jan Rudolf
    Zimmermann, Ortrud
    Gross, Uwe
    FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [46] Clostridium difficile in beef cattle farms, farmers and their environment: Assessing the spread of the bacterium
    Rodriguez, Cristina
    Hakimi, Djalal-Eddine
    Vanleyssem, Raphael
    Tarniniau, Bernard
    Van Broeck, Johan
    Delmee, Michel
    Korsak, Nicolas
    Daube, Georges
    VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 2017, 210 : 183 - 187
  • [47] Toxin profiles and antimicrobial resistance patterns among toxigenic clinical isolates of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile
    Heidari, Hamid
    Ebrahim-Saraie, Hadi Sedigh
    Amanati, Ali
    Motamedifar, Mohammad
    Hadi, Nahal
    Bazargani, Abdollah
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF BASIC MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2019, 22 (07) : 813 - 819
  • [48] One Health approach to Clostridioides difficile in Japan
    Usui, Masaru
    JOURNAL OF INFECTION AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2020, 26 (07) : 643 - 650
  • [49] Approaches to the detection of Clostridioides difficile in the healthcare environment
    Grainger, R. J.
    Stevens, N. T.
    Humphreys, H.
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2019, 103 (04) : 375 - 381
  • [50] Antibacterial activity and mechanism of action of chitosan nanofibers against toxigenic Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile Isolates
    Abadi, M. Shahini Shams
    Mirzaei, E.
    Bazargani, A.
    Gholipour, A.
    Heidari, H.
    Hadi, N.
    ANNALI DI IGIENE MEDICINA PREVENTIVA E DI COMUNITA, 2020, 32 (01): : 72 - 80