Environmental contamination with Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile in Vietnam

被引:2
|
作者
Khun, Peng An [1 ]
Phi, Long Duc [2 ]
Bui, Huong Thi Thu [3 ]
Bui, Nguyen Thi [4 ]
Vu, Quyen Thi Huyen [4 ]
Trinh, Luong Duy [4 ]
Collins, Deirdre A. [5 ]
Riley, Thomas, V [1 ,5 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Australia, Sch Biomed Sci, Nedlands, WA 6009, Australia
[2] Thai Binh Univ Med & Pharm, Thai Binh 410000, Vietnam
[3] Thai Binh Gen Hosp, Thai Binh 410000, Vietnam
[4] Ninh Binh Women & Childrens Hosp, Ninh Binh 430000, Vietnam
[5] Edith Cowan Univ, Sch Med & Hlth Sci, Joondalup, WA 6027, Australia
[6] Murdoch Univ, Med Mol & Forens Sci, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia
[7] PathWest Lab Med, Dept Microbiol, Nedlands, WA 6009, Australia
[8] Univ Western Australia, Queen Elizabeth II Med Ctr, Sch Biomed Sci, Nedlands, WA 6009, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile; environment; animals; root vegetables; sources; reservoirs; Vietnam; HIGH PREVALENCE; INFECTION; EPIDEMIOLOGY; PIGS; HUMANS;
D O I
10.1093/jambio/lxad118
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Aims To investigate the prevalence, molecular type, and antimicrobial susceptibility of Clostridioides difficile in the environment in Vietnam, where little is known about C. difficile. Methods and results Samples of pig faeces, soils from pig farms, potatoes, and the hospital environment were cultured for C. difficile. Isolates were identified and typed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) ribotyping. The overall prevalence of C. difficile contamination was 24.5% (68/278). Clostridioides difficile was detected mainly in soils from pig farms and hospital soils, with 70%-100% prevalence. Clostridioides difficile was isolated from 3.4% of pig faecal samples and 5% of potato surfaces. The four most prevalent ribotypes (RTs) were RTs 001, 009, 038, and QX574. All isolates were susceptible to metronidazole, fidaxomicin, vancomycin, and amoxicillin/clavulanate, while resistance to erythromycin, tetracycline, and moxifloxacin was common in toxigenic strains. Clostridioides difficile RTs 001A(+)B(+)CDT(-) and 038A(-)B(-)CDT(-) were predominantly multidrug resistant. Conclusions Environmental sources of C. difficile are important to consider in the epidemiology of C. difficile infection in Vietnam, however, contaminated soils are likely to be the most important source of C. difficile. This poses additional challenges to controlling infections in healthcare settings.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Impact of Infection Versus Colonization on Clostridioides difficile Environmental Contamination in Hospitalized Patients With Diarrhea
    Warren, Bobby G.
    Turner, Nicholas A.
    Addison, Rachel
    Nelson, Alicia
    Barrett, Aaron
    Addison, Bechtler
    Graves, Amanda
    Smith, Becky
    Lewis, Sarah S.
    Weber, David J.
    Sickbert-Bennett, Emily E.
    Anderson, Deverick J.
    OPEN FORUM INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2022, 9 (04):
  • [22] Detection, Characterization and Antibiotic Susceptibility of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile in Meat Products
    Muratoglu, Karlo
    Akkaya, Esra
    Hampikyan, Hamparsun
    Bingol, Enver Baris
    Cetin, Omer
    Colak, Hilal
    FOOD SCIENCE OF ANIMAL RESOURCES, 2020, 40 (04) : 578 - 587
  • [23] Clostridium difficile in wild rodents and insectivores in the Netherlands
    Krijger, I. M.
    Meerburg, B. G.
    Harmanus, C.
    Burt, S. A.
    LETTERS IN APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 2019, 69 (01) : 35 - 40
  • [24] Contamination of ready-to-eat raw vegetables with Clostridium difficile in France
    Eckert, Catherine
    Burghoffer, Beatrice
    Barbut, Frederic
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2013, 62 : 1435 - 1438
  • [25] Epidemiology of Clostridium (Clostridioides) difficile Infection in Southeast Asia
    Khun, Peng An
    Riley, Thomas V.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE, 2022, 107 (03): : 517 - 526
  • [26] Comparison of qPCR versus culture for the detection and quantification of Clostridium difficile environmental contamination
    MacDougall, Laura K.
    Broukhanski, George
    Simor, Andrew
    Johnstone, Jennie
    Mubareka, Samira
    McGeer, Allison
    Daneman, Nick
    Garber, Gary
    Brown, Kevin A.
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (08):
  • [27] Clostridioides difficile in bat guano
    Bandelj, Petra
    Knapic, Tea
    Rousseau, Joyce
    Podgorelec, Monika
    Presetnik, Primoz
    Vengust, Modest
    Weese, J. Scott
    COMPARATIVE IMMUNOLOGY MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2019, 65 : 144 - 147
  • [28] Clostridioides difficile (formerly Clostridium difficile) infection in the critically ill: an expert statement
    Massimo Antonelli
    Ignacio Martin-Loeches
    George Dimopoulos
    Antonio Gasbarrini
    Maria Sole Vallecoccia
    Intensive Care Medicine, 2020, 46 : 215 - 224
  • [29] Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile carriage in asymptomatic children since 2010: a narrative review
    Boyanova, Lyudmila
    Kalvatchev, Nikolay
    Yordanov, Daniel
    Hadzhiyski, Petyo
    Markovska, Rumyana
    Gergova, Galina
    Mitov, Ivan
    BIOTECHNOLOGY & BIOTECHNOLOGICAL EQUIPMENT, 2019, 33 (01) : 1228 - 1236
  • [30] Biogeographic distribution and molecular epidemiology of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile in Western Australian soils
    Cautivo-Reyes, Karla
    Knight, Daniel R.
    Bowie, Deborah
    Moreira-Grez, Benjamin
    Whiteley, Andrew S.
    Riley, Thomas V.
    APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2023, 89 (10)