Clinical impact of molecular breast imaging as adjunct diagnostic modality in evaluation of indeterminate breast abnormalities and unresolved diagnostic concerns

被引:1
作者
van Loevezijn, Ariane A. [1 ]
Corion, Christinne L. S. [2 ]
Zeillemaker, Anneke M. [3 ]
Wijers, Lidy M. H. [4 ]
Smithuis, Robin H. M. [4 ]
Olmos, Renato A. Valdes [5 ]
van der Hage, Jos A. [6 ]
de Geus-Oei, Lioe-Fee [5 ,7 ]
Benard, Menno [8 ]
Arias-Bouda, Lenka M. Pereira [5 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Netherlands Canc Inst Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Dept Surg Oncol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Haaglanden Med Ctr, Dept Surg, The Hague, Netherlands
[3] Alrijne Hosp, Dept Surg, Leiderdorp, Netherlands
[4] Alrijne Hosp, Dept Radiol, Leiderdorp, Netherlands
[5] Leiden Univ Med Ctr, Sect Nucl Med, Dept Radiol, POB 9600, NL-2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands
[6] Leiden Univ Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Leiden, Netherlands
[7] Univ Twente, Biomed Photon Imaging Grp, Enschede, Netherlands
[8] Alrijne Hosp, Dept Res & Educ, Leiderdorp, Netherlands
[9] Alrijne Hosp, Dept Nucl Med, Leiderdorp, Netherlands
关键词
breast-specific gamma imaging; breast cancer; diagnostic imaging; molecular breast imaging; Tc-99m-sestamibi; GAMMA-CAMERA; CANCER; WOMEN; MAMMOGRAPHY; MRI; TC-99M-SESTAMIBI; EXPERIENCE; ACCURACY; BIOPSY; SCREEN;
D O I
10.1097/MNM.0000000000001684
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PurposeImprovements in molecular breast imaging (MBI) have increased the use of MBI as adjunct diagnostic modality and alternative to MRI. We aimed to assess the value of MBI in patients with equivocal breast lesions on conventional imaging, especially in terms of its ability to rule out malignancy. MethodsWe selected patients who underwent MBI in addition to conventional diagnostics due to equivocal breast lesions between 2012 and 2015. All patients underwent digital mammography, target ultrasound and MBI. MBI was performed using a single-head Dilon 6800 gamma camera after administration of 600 MBq Tc-99m-sestamibi. Imaging was reported according to BI-RADS classification and compared with pathology or follow-up of >= 6 months. ResultsOf 226 women included, pathology was obtained in 106 (47%) and (pre)malignant lesions were found in 25 (11%). Median follow-up was 5.4 years (IQR 3.9-7.1). Sensitivity was higher for MBI compared to conventional diagnostics (84% vs. 32%; P = 0.002), identifying malignancy in 21 and 6 patients, respectively, but specificity did not differ (86% vs. 81%; P = 0.161). Positive and negative predictive value were 43% and 98% for MBI and 17% and 91% for conventional diagnostics. MBI was discordant with conventional diagnostics in 68 (30%) patients and correctly changed diagnosis in 46 (20%) patients, identifying 15 malignant lesions. In subgroups with nipple discharge (N = 42) and BI-RADS 3 lesions (N = 113) MBI detected 7 of 8 occult malignancies. ConclusionMBI correctly adjusted treatment in 20% of patients with diagnostic concerns after conventional work-up, and could rule out malignancy with a high negative predictive value of 98%.
引用
收藏
页码:417 / 426
页数:10
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] Supplemental MRI Screening for Women with Extremely Dense Breast Tissue
    Bakker, Marije F.
    de Lange, Stephanie V.
    Pijnappel, Ruud M.
    Mann, Ritse M.
    Peeters, Petra H. M.
    Monninkhof, Evelyn M.
    Emaus, Marleen J.
    Loo, Claudette E.
    Bisschops, Robertus H. C.
    Lobbes, Marc B. I.
    de Jong, Matthijn D. F.
    Duvivier, Katya M.
    Veltman, Jeroen
    Karssemeijer, Nico
    de Koning, Harry J.
    van Diest, Paul J.
    Mali, Willem P. T. M.
    van den Bosch, Maurice A. A. J.
    Veldhuis, Wouter B.
    van Gils, Carla H.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2019, 381 (22) : 2091 - 2102
  • [2] Breast-specific gamma imaging as an adjunct imaging modality for the diagnosis of breast cancer
    Brem, Rachel F.
    Floerke, Angelique C.
    Rapelyea, Jocelyn A.
    Teal, Christine
    Kelly, Tricia
    Mathur, Vivek
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2008, 247 (03) : 651 - 657
  • [3] Breast-Specific γ-Imaging for the Detection of Mammographically Occult Breast Cancer in Women at Increased Risk
    Brem, Rachel F.
    Ruda, Rachel C.
    Yang, Jialu L.
    Coffey, Caitrin M.
    Rapelyea, Jocelyn A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2016, 57 (05) : 678 - 684
  • [4] Buscombe J R, 1999, Nucl Med Rev Cent East Eur, V2, P36
  • [5] Bloody nipple discharge is a predictor of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis
    Chen, Ling
    Zhou, Wen-Bin
    Zhao, Yi
    Liu, Xiao-An
    Ding, Qiang
    Zha, Xiao-Ming
    Wang, Shui
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2012, 132 (01) : 9 - 14
  • [6] Validity of breast-specific gamma imaging for Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System 4 lesions on mammography and/or ultrasound
    Cho, Min Jeng
    Yang, Jung-Hyun
    Yu, Yeong Beom
    Park, Kyoung Sik
    Chung, Hyun Woo
    So, Young
    Choi, Nami
    Kim, Mi Young
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL TREATMENT AND RESEARCH, 2016, 90 (04) : 194 - 200
  • [7] Usefulness of feature analysis of breast-specific gamma imaging for predicting malignancy
    Choi, Eun Kyoung
    Im, Jooyeon Jamie
    Park, Chang Suk
    Chung, Yong-An
    Kim, Kijun
    Oh, Jin Kyoung
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2018, 28 (12) : 5195 - 5202
  • [8] Adjunctive Breast-Specific Gamma Imaging for Detecting Cancer in Women with Calcifications at Mammography
    Chung, Hyun Woo
    So, Young
    Yang, Jung-Hyun
    Park, Kyoung Sik
    Yoo, Young Bum
    Choi, Nami
    Kim, Mi Young
    Kim, Jayoun
    Lee, Eun Jeong
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 24 (12) : 3541 - 3548
  • [9] Methodological aspects of 99mTc-sestamibi guided biopsy in breast cancer
    Collarino A.
    Valdés Olmos R.A.
    van der Hoeven A.F.
    Pereira Arias-Bouda L.M.
    [J]. Clinical and Translational Imaging, 2016, 4 (5) : 367 - 376
  • [10] First Clinical Experience Using Stereotactic Breast Biopsy Guided by 99mTc-Sestamibi
    Collarino, Angela
    Olmos, Renato A. Valdes
    Neijenhuis, Peter A.
    den Hartog, Wietske C.
    Smit, Frederik
    de Geus-Oei, Lioe-Fee
    Arias-Bouda, Lenka M. Pereira
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2017, 209 (06) : 1367 - 1373