STEM professional learning in early childhood education: a scoping review

被引:3
作者
MacDonald, Amy [1 ]
Danaia, Lena [2 ]
Deehan, James [2 ]
Hall, Allan [1 ]
机构
[1] Charles Sturt Univ, Sch Educ, Albury, Australia
[2] Charles Sturt Univ, Sch Educ, Bathurst, Australia
关键词
CURRICULUM; OUTCOMES; BELIEFS; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1080/10901027.2023.2224251
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Initiatives aimed at improving STEM education have largely focused on school-based programs, with the majority of STEM professional development targeting primary and secondary school educators. However, there is growing interest in STEM education in the early childhood years. This paper reviews the available evidence to explore the extent to which early childhood STEM professional learning programs are represented in the research literature. The review examines: 1. The emergence of research focused on STEM professional learning for early childhood educators; 2. The characteristics of these professional learning programs; and 3. The research evidence for the efficacy and impact of these programs. Using a scoping review methodology, our search yielded only 22 papers for analysis, with most of the studies published in the last seven years of the review period. Different views and definitions of STEM were evident across the studies, with few explicitly describing the integration of the four STEM disciplines. The majority of papers reported a workshops/in-service training approach. Unanimously, the 22 studies reported positive outcomes from the participants' engagement with early childhood STEM professional learning. However, the small number of research papers available for review confirms the need to build the evidence base for early childhood STEM professional learning.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 95
页数:17
相关论文
共 68 条
  • [11] Bybee R.W., 2013, The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities, DOI DOI 10.2505/9781936959259
  • [12] Campbell C., 2018, CREATIVE ED, V9, P11, DOI DOI 10.4236/CE.2018.91002
  • [13] Capraro R.M., 2013, STEM project-based learning: An integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) approach, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-6209-143-6
  • [14] Implementing "Big Ideas" to Advance the Teaching and Learning of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM)
    Chalmers, Christina
    Carter, Merilyn
    Cooper, Tom
    Nason, Rod
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS EDUCATION, 2017, 15 : S25 - S43
  • [15] Virtual team professional learning and development for practitioners in education
    Charteris, Jennifer
    Berman, Jeanette
    Page, Angela
    [J]. PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT IN EDUCATION, 2021, 47 (04) : 638 - 650
  • [16] Counsell S. L., 2019, J EARLY CHILD TEACH, V40, P352, DOI [10.1080/10901027.2019.1603173, DOI 10.1080/10901027.2019.1603173]
  • [17] Deehan J., 2017, The science teaching efficacy belief instruments (STEBI A and B) A comprehensive review of methods and findings from 25 years of science education research
  • [18] A scoping review of interventions in primary science education
    Deehan, James
    MacDonald, Amy
    Morris, Christopher
    [J]. STUDIES IN SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2024, 60 (01) : 1 - 43
  • [19] DeJarnette N.K., 2018, EUROPEAN J STEM ED, V3, P1, DOI DOI 10.20897/EJSTEME/3878
  • [20] "How am I supposed to do this on my own?": A case study on perspectives of preschool teachers regarding integrative STEM practices
    Demircan, Hasibe Ozlen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EARLY CHILDHOOD RESEARCH, 2022, 20 (01) : 93 - 112