High-Fidelity Aerostructural Optimization with a Geometrically Nonlinear Flutter Constraint

被引:13
作者
Gray, Alasdair C. [1 ]
Riso, Cristina [2 ]
Jonsson, Eirikur [1 ]
Martins, Joaquim R. R. A. [1 ]
Cesnik, Carlos E. S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Aerosp Engn, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Georgia Inst Technol, Daniel Guggenheim Sch Aerosp Engn, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
关键词
Finite Element Modeling; Multidisciplinary Design Optimization; Computational Fluid Dynamics; Nonlinear Aeroelastic Systems; Aircraft Wing Design; Structural Dynamics and Characterization; Flutter Analysis; Aircraft Flutter; Structural Optimization; Shape Optimization; FRAMEWORK; DESIGN; AEROELASTICITY;
D O I
10.2514/1.J062127
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
When designing aircraft, avoiding dynamic aeroelastic instabilities such as flutter is a key requirement. One way to meet this requirement is to use a multidisciplinary design optimization subject to a flutter constraint. Flutter-constrained design optimizations have used geometrically linear detailed models, which do not accurately predict flutter for very flexible aircraft, or geometrically nonlinear low-order models, which do not accurately trade off cruise range and structural mass. This paper presents a framework for integrating a geometrically nonlinear, subsonic flutter constraint that captures the large in-flight deflections of very flexible aircraft into high-fidelity gradient-based aerostructural optimization. The cruise range and stress constraints are computed accurately with detailed aerostructural analyses, which use a built-up finite element model coupled to Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes computational fluid dynamics. The detailed model is condensed to a low-order aeroelastic model to compute the geometrically nonlinear flutter constraint and its adjoint derivatives with computational cost and robustness suitable for optimization. The framework is demonstrated by maximizing the cruise range of a subsonic high-aspect-ratio wing with respect to panel thicknesses, sweep, and span. The impact of the geometrically nonlinear flutter constraint highly depends on the in-flight deformation level. At low deflection levels, sweeping the wing backward is the most effective flutter prevention method, and the flutter constraint has little impact on the achievable cruise range. At high deflection levels, shortening the wing span is necessary to suppress flutter, reducing the achievable cruise range by up to 5.9%. This work is a step toward making multidisciplinary design optimization a practical tool for designing the energy-efficient, very flexible aircraft of the future, which require geometrically nonlinear flutter analyses early in the design cycle to prevent flutter.
引用
收藏
页码:2430 / 2443
页数:14
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] A review on non-linear aeroelasticity of high aspect-ratio wings
    Afonso, Frederico
    Vale, Jose
    Oliveira, Eder
    Lau, Fernando
    Suleman, Afzal
    [J]. PROGRESS IN AEROSPACE SCIENCES, 2017, 89 : 40 - 57
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1989, CR4220 NASA
  • [3] Multimodality in Aerodynamic Wing Design Optimization
    Bons, Nicolas P.
    He, Xiaolong
    Mader, Charles A.
    Martins, Joaquim R. R. A.
    [J]. AIAA JOURNAL, 2019, 57 (03) : 1004 - 1018
  • [4] Bordogna M. T., 17 INT FOR AER STRUC, V2017
  • [5] Aerostructural Tradeoffs for Tow-Steered Composite Wings
    Brooks, Timothy R.
    Martins, Joaquim R. R. A.
    Kennedy, Graeme J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2020, 57 (05): : 787 - 799
  • [6] Geometrically Nonlinear Effects on the Aeroelastic Response of a Transport Aircraft Configuration
    Cea, Alvaro
    Palacios, Rafael
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2023, 60 (01): : 205 - 220
  • [7] Reexamined Structural Design Procedures for Very Flexible Aircraft
    Cesnik, Carlos E. S.
    Palacios, Rafael
    Reichenbach, Eric Y.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2014, 51 (05): : 1580 - 1591
  • [8] Numerical simulation and experimental validation of slender wings flutter behaviour
    Cestino, E.
    Frulla, G.
    Spina, M.
    Catelani, D.
    Linari, M.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART G-JOURNAL OF AEROSPACE ENGINEERING, 2019, 233 (16) : 5913 - 5928
  • [9] Flutter Tests of the Pazy Wing
    Drachinsky, Ariel
    Avin, Or
    Raveh, Daniella E.
    Ben-Shmuel, Yaron
    Tur, Moshe
    [J]. AIAA JOURNAL, 2022, 60 (09) : 5414 - 5421
  • [10] Nonlinear Aeroelastic Analysis of Highly Flexible Wings Using the Modal Rotation Method
    Drachinsky, Ariel
    Raveh, Daniella E.
    [J]. AIAA JOURNAL, 2022, 60 (05) : 3122 - 3134