Disentangling the practice of landscape approaches: a Q-method analysis on experiences in socio-ecological production landscapes and seascapes

被引:8
作者
Torralba, Mario [1 ,2 ]
Nishi, Maiko [3 ]
Cebrian-Piqueras, Miguel A. [2 ,6 ]
Quintas-Soriano, Cristina [4 ]
Garcia-Martin, Maria [5 ]
Plieninger, Tobias [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kassel, Fac Organ Agr Sci, Pl Gottinger Sieben 5, D-37073 Gottingen, Germany
[2] Univ Gottingen, Dept Agr Econ & Rural Dev, Pl Gottinger Sieben 5, D-37073 Gottingen, Germany
[3] UN Univ Inst Adv Study Sustainabil UNU IAS, 5-53-70 Jingumae,Shibuya Ku, Tokyo 1508925, Japan
[4] Univ Almeria, Ctr Andaluz Estudio & Seguimiento Cambio Global C, Social Ecol Res Lab, Almeria 04120, Spain
[5] Swiss Fed Res Inst WSL, Res Unit Landscape Dynam, Zurcherstr 111, CH-8903 Birmensdorf, Switzerland
[6] Leuphana Univ Luneburg, Social Ecol Syst Inst, Fac Sustainabil, Univ Allee 1, D-21335 Luneburg, Germany
关键词
Landscape sustainability; SEPLS; Q-sorts; Integrated landscape management; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; TRADE-OFFS; SUSTAINABILITY; CONSERVATION; SCIENCE; SYNERGIES; FRAMEWORK; SYSTEMS; DESIGN; POLICY;
D O I
10.1007/s11625-023-01307-2
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Landscape approaches are gaining momentum in both scientific and policy agendas. However, landscape approaches comprise a multitude of concepts, approaches and principles, which are in part similar, in some parts different or even contradictory. In this paper, we used a Q-method questionnaire to explore how landscape approaches are understood and employed in 45 case studies of socio-ecological production landscapes and seascapes derived from the International Partnership for the Satoyama Initiative (IPSI), as well as the motivations for employing them. Our analysis revealed that all landscape approaches pursued very similar goals, namely to ensure that local communities as landscape stewards have the capacity to preserve context-specific values in the face of socio-economic and environmental changes. The tools for reaching such goals are built upon people and nature feedback dynamics that crystalize in rich biodiversity and local ecological knowledge. However, our analysis also showed that the means to reach those goals differed depending on many contextual factors, such as the dominant ecosystems and socio-economic activities in the landscape, the constellation of actors or the most relevant drivers of change affecting the social-ecological system. In particular, we identified four distinct lenses in which landscapes approaches are applied in practice to landscape sustainability: (1) for the preservation of natural values, (2) for the preservation of socio-cultural values, (3) for the promotion of social justice and participatory governance, and (4) for securing food security and local livelihoods. Our results showed an association between the choice of a lens and the value types motivating the use of a landscape approach. Relational values were associated with a focus on landscape conservation and safeguard of social-ecological values. Our study highlights the relevant and beneficial role of landscape approaches as a boundary concept and emphasizes the need for transdisciplinary and participatory methods within landscape research and practice to navigate the context-specific options for implementation of landscape approaches.
引用
收藏
页码:1893 / 1906
页数:14
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2010, DECISION X 2 STRATEG
[2]   Widening the Evaluative Space for Ecosystem Services: A Taxonomy of Plural Values and Valuation Methods [J].
Arias-Arevalo, Paola ;
Gomez-Baggethun, Erik ;
Martin-Lopez, Berta ;
Perez-Rincon, Mario .
ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES, 2018, 27 (01) :29-53
[3]   Landscape Approaches: A State-of-the-Art Review [J].
Arts, Bas ;
Buizer, Marleen ;
Horlings, Lummina ;
Ingram, Verina ;
van Oosten, Cora ;
Opdam, Paul .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES, VOL 42, 2017, 42 :439-463
[4]   Bright spots: seeds of a good Anthropocene [J].
Bennett, Elena M. ;
Solan, Martin ;
Biggs, Reinette ;
McPhearson, Timon ;
Norstrom, Albert V. ;
Olsson, Per ;
Pereira, Laura ;
Peterson, Garry D. ;
Raudsepp-Hearne, Ciara ;
Biermann, Frank ;
Carpenter, Stephen R. ;
Ellis, Erle C. ;
Hichert, Tanja ;
Galaz, Victor ;
Lahsen, Myanna ;
Milkoreit, Manjana ;
Lopez, Berta Martin ;
Nicholas, Kimberly A. ;
Preiser, Rika ;
Vince, Gaia ;
Vervoort, Joost M. ;
Xu, Jianchu .
FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 14 (08) :441-448
[5]  
Brundtland GH, 1987, Our common future, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0378-777X(85)80040-8
[6]   Editorial overview: Relational values: what are they, and what's the fuss about? [J].
Chan, Kai M. A. ;
Gould, Rachelle K. ;
Pascual, Unai .
CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 35 :A1-A7
[7]   Why protect nature? Rethinking values and the environment [J].
Chan, Kai M. A. ;
Balvanera, Patricia ;
Benessaiah, Karina ;
Chapman, Mollie ;
Diaz, Sandra ;
Gomez-Baggethun, Erik ;
Gould, Rachelle ;
Hannahs, Neil ;
Jax, Kurt ;
Klain, Sarah ;
Luck, Gary W. ;
Martin-Lopez, Berta ;
Muraca, Barbara ;
Norton, Bryan ;
Ott, Konrad ;
Pascual, Unai ;
Satterfield, Terre ;
Tadaki, Marc ;
Taggart, Jonathan ;
Turner, Nancy .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2016, 113 (06) :1462-1465
[8]   Spatial resilience: integrating landscape ecology, resilience, and sustainability [J].
Cumming, Graeme S. .
LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2011, 26 (07) :899-909
[9]   Conservation policy in traditional farming landscapes [J].
Fischer, Joern ;
Hartel, Tibor ;
Kuemmerle, Tobias .
CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2012, 5 (03) :167-175
[10]   Labelling in Mediterranean agroforestry landscapes: a Delphi study on relevant sustainability indicators [J].
Flinzberger, Lukas ;
Zinngrebe, Yves ;
Plieninger, Tobias .
SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE, 2020, 15 (05) :1369-1382