Marginal and internal fit of five-unit zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses fabricated with digital scans and conventional impressions: A comparative in vitro study

被引:2
作者
Bandiaky, Octave Nadile [1 ,5 ]
Clouet, Roselyne [2 ]
Le Bars, Pierre [2 ]
Soueidan, Assem [3 ]
Le Guehennec, Laurent [4 ]
机构
[1] Nantes Univ, Univ Angers, CHU Nantes, INSERM,Regenerat Med & Skeleton,Oniris, Nantes, France
[2] Nantes Univ, CHU Nantes, Dept Prosthet Dent, Nantes, France
[3] Nantes Univ, Univ Angers, CHU Nantes, INSERM Regenerat Med & Skeleton,Oniris,Dept Period, Nantes, France
[4] Nantes Univ, Univ Angers, CHU Nantes, Regenerat Med & Skeleton,INSERM,Oniris,Dept Prosth, Nantes, France
[5] Nantes Univ, Univ Angers, CHU Nantes, INSERM,Oniris,Regenerat Med & Skeleton,RMeS UMR 12, 1 Pl Alexis Ricordeau, F-44042 Nantes, France
来源
JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY | 2023年 / 32卷 / 09期
关键词
accuracy; CAD-CAM; digital impression; high resolution; intraoral scanners; micro-CT; INTRAORAL IMPRESSIONS; CLINICAL-EVALUATION; CAD/CAM TECHNOLOGY; CROWNS; RESTORATIONS; ACCURACY; PROSTHODONTICS; ADAPTATION; SILICONE; DISTANCE;
D O I
10.1111/jopr.13639
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
PurposeThis study aimed to compare the marginal and internal fit of five-unit zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) fabricated using digital scans and conventional impressions. Materials and methodsNine master models with three zirconia abutments were scanned with an intraoral scanner (test group), and nine conventional impressions (control group) of these same models were also made. The stone casts from these impressions were scanned with a laboratory extraoral scanner (D700, 3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark). A total of 18 five-unit zirconia-based FDP frameworks (test group, n = 9; control group, n = 9) were manufactured. Marginal and internal fit (in mu m) were evaluated using the replica method under micro-computed tomography. Analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA) and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare continuous variables across two groups. A level of p The mean +/- standard deviation of the marginal fit was 95.03 +/- 12.74 mu m in the test group and 106.02 +/- 14.51 mu m in the control group. The lowest marginal mean value was observed in the test group, with a statistically significant difference compared to the control group (F = 14.56, p < 0.05). The mean +/- standard deviation of the internal fit was 103.61 +/- 9.32 and 106.38 +/- 7.64 mu m, respectively, in the test and control groups, with no statistically significant difference (F = 1.56, p > 0.05). The mean values of both groups were clinically acceptable. ConclusionsThe five-unit zirconia-based FDPs fabricated with digital scans showed better fit than those in the conventional impression group. Within the limitations of this study, these results are encouraging, and continued progress in the digital field should allow for more accurate long-span restorations.
引用
收藏
页码:846 / 853
页数:8
相关论文
共 73 条
  • [1] Accuracy of Intraoral Scanners: A Systematic Review of Influencing Factors
    Abduo, Jaafar
    Elseyoufi, Mohamed
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2018, 26 (03) : 101 - 121
  • [2] Digital Versus Conventional Impressions in Fixed Prosthodontics: A Review
    Ahlholm, Pekka
    Sipila, Kirsi
    Vallittu, Pekka
    Jakonen, Minna
    Kotiranta, Ulla
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2018, 27 (01): : 35 - 41
  • [3] Evaluation of fit and efficiency of CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic restorations based on direct and indirect digitalization: a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial
    Ahrberg, Danush
    Lauer, Hans Christoph
    Ahrberg, Martin
    Weigl, Paul
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2016, 20 (02) : 291 - 300
  • [4] Vertical marginal fit of zirconia copings fabricated with one direct and three indirect digital scanning techniques
    Akhlaghian, Marzieh
    Khaledi, Amir-Alireza
    Farzin, Mitra
    Pardis, Soheil
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2021, 126 (03) : 421 - 426
  • [5] Comparison of the Fit of Lithium Disilicate Crowns made from Conventional, Digital, or Conventional/Digital Techniques
    Al Hamad, Khaled Q.
    Al Rashdan, Bashar A.
    Al Omari, Wael M.
    Baba, Nadim Z.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2019, 28 (02): : E580 - E586
  • [6] Evaluation of marginal and internal fit of acrylic bridges using optical coherence tomography
    Al-Imam, Hiba
    Michou, Stavroula
    Benetti, Ana R.
    Gotfredsen, Klaus
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2019, 46 (03) : 274 - 281
  • [7] Comparison of marginal and internal fit of 3-unit zirconia frameworks fabricated with CAD-CAM technology using direct and indirect digital scans
    Arezoobakhsh, Ali
    Shayegh, Sayed Shojaedin
    Ghomi, Ali Jamali
    Hakimaneh, Seyed Mohammad Reza
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2020, 123 (01) : 105 - 112
  • [8] Comparative assessment of complete-coverage, fixed tooth-supported prostheses fabricated from digital scans or conventional impressions: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bandiaky, Octave Nadile
    Le Bars, Pierre
    Gaudin, Alexis
    Hardouin, Jean Benoit
    Cheraud-Carpentier, Marjorie
    Mbodj, Elhadj Babacar
    Soueidan, Assem
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2022, 127 (01) : 71 - 79
  • [9] Randomized controlled clinical trial of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of zirconia-ceramic fixed partial dentures. Part III: Marginal and internal fit
    Benic, Goran, I
    Sailer, Irena
    Zeltner, Marco
    Gutermann, Janine N.
    Ozcan, Mutlu
    Muhlemann, Sven
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2019, 121 (03) : 426 - 431
  • [10] Influence of conventional and digital intraoral impressions on the fit of CAD/CAM-fabricated all-ceramic crowns
    Berrendero, S.
    Salido, M. P.
    Valverde, A.
    Ferreiroa, A.
    Pradies, G.
    [J]. Clinical Oral Investigations, 2016, 20 (09) : 2403 - 2410