Is energy intensity a driver of structural change? Empirical evidence from the global economy

被引:0
作者
Nieto, Jaime [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Moyano, Pedro B. [1 ]
Moyano, Diego [1 ,2 ]
Miguel, Luis Javier [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Valladolid, Dept Appl Econ, Valladolid, Spain
[2] Univ Valladolid, Res Grp Energy Econ & Syst Dynam, Valladolid, Spain
[3] Univ Valladolid, Fac CC EE & Empresariales, Avda Valle Esgueva, Valladolid 647011, Spain
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
energy efficiency; industrial ecology; industrial metabolism; input-output analysis (IOA); structural change; technical coefficients; INPUT-OUTPUT DATABASE; DEMAND-SIDE SOLUTIONS; KEY SECTORS; TABLES; CONSTRUCTION;
D O I
10.1111/jiec.13352
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Input-output tables (IOTs) provide a relevant picture of economic structure as they represent the composition and interindustry relationships of an economy. The technical coefficients matrix (A matrix) is considered to capture the technological status of an economy; so, it is of special relevance for the evaluation of long-term, structural transformations, such as sustainability transitions in integrated assessment models (IAMs). The A matrix has typically been considered either static or exogenous. Endogenous structural change has rarely been applied to models. The objective of this paper is to analyze energy intensity, a widely used variable in IAMs, and its role as a driver of structural change. We therefore identify the most relevant technical coefficients in the IOTs time series and estimate an econometric model based on the energy intensity of five different final end-use energy sources. The results of this analysis show that energy intensity has a significant influence on the evolution of the A matrix and should therefore be taken into consideration when analyzing endogenous structural change in models.
引用
收藏
页码:283 / 296
页数:14
相关论文
共 70 条
  • [1] Jevons' paradox
    Alcott, B
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2005, 54 (01) : 9 - 21
  • [2] Alcott B., 2012, JEVONS PARADOX MYTH, DOI 10.4324/9781849773102
  • [3] Ayres R.U., 2019, ENV SCI, DOI 10.1093/obo/9780199363445-0121
  • [4] Bacharach M., 1970, BIPROPORTIONAL MATRI
  • [5] A framework for technological learning in the supply chain: A case study on CdTe photovoltaics
    Bergesen, Joseph D.
    Suh, Sangwon
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2016, 169 : 721 - 728
  • [6] Briens F., 2015, INVESTIGATING PATHWA
  • [7] Why does energy intensity fluctuate in China?
    Chai, Jian
    Guo, Ju-E
    Wang, Shou-Yang
    Lai, Kin Keung
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2009, 37 (12) : 5717 - 5731
  • [8] INTERNATIONAL COMPARISONS OF THE STRUCTURE OF PRODUCTION
    CHENERY, HB
    WATANABE, T
    [J]. ECONOMETRICA, 1958, 26 (04) : 487 - 521
  • [9] Ciaschini M., 1988, INPUT OUTPUT ANAL CU, P43, DOI [10.1007/978-94-009-2607-3_3, DOI 10.1007/978-94-009-2607-3_3]
  • [10] Towards demand-side solutions for mitigating climate change
    Creutzig, Felix
    Roy, Joyashree
    Lamb, William F.
    Azevedo, Ines M. L.
    de Bruin, Waendi Bruine
    Dalkmann, Holger
    Edelenbosch, Oreane Y.
    Geels, Frank W.
    Grubler, Arnulf
    Hepburn, Cameron
    Hertwich, Edgar G.
    Khosla, Radhika
    Mattauch, Linus
    Minx, Jan C.
    Ramakrishnan, Anjali
    Rao, Narasimha D.
    Steinberger, Julia K.
    Tavoni, Massimo
    Uerge-Vorsatz, Diana
    Weber, Elke U.
    [J]. NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2018, 8 (04) : 268 - 271