THE EFFECTS OF INTERNATIONAL SANCTIONS ON GREEN INNOVATIONS

被引:68
作者
Fu, Qiang [1 ]
Gong, Qiang [2 ]
Zhao, Xin-Xin [3 ]
Chang, Chun-Ping [4 ]
机构
[1] Changsha Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Econ & Management, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Zhongnan Univ Econ & Law, Wenlan Sch Business, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[3] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Econ & Finance, Xian, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[4] Shih Chien Univ, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
关键词
GMM model; international sanctions; green innovations; US ECONOMIC SANCTIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION; IMPACT; DETERMINANTS; GROWTH; ROLES; TRADE;
D O I
10.3846/tede.2022.17782
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Since China is facing a complicated international situation and sustainable development requirement at the same time, this paper examines the effects of external uncertainty, international sanctions, on green innovations by adopting the system generalized method of moments (GMM) estimation for 30 provinces (autonomous region and municipalities) from 1997 to 2019. We employ green inventions as the dependent variable and 5 indicators of sanctions (including unilateral, plurilateral, multilateral, economic, and intensity) as the main explanatory variables alternately. For further robustness tests, we use substitution variable green utility models, adopt sub-samples in different regions, change the empirical methodology, and add omitted variables. We also examine the mechanism effects of three possible channels. The conclusion is that plurilateral and economic sanctions both present significant negative impacts on green innovations, whereas China was not affected by unilateral or multilateral sanctions during the sample period. GDP, interpersonal globalization, and environment are proved to be the possible channels through which sanctions affect green innovations. Our research findings should assist Chinese-listed companies suffering from sanctions to make better responses on their way to green innovations.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 164
页数:24
相关论文
共 82 条
[1]   Barriers to green innovation initiatives among manufacturers: the Malaysian case [J].
Abdullah, Mirza ;
Zailani, Suhaiza ;
Iranmanesh, Mohammad ;
Jayaraman, K. .
REVIEW OF MANAGERIAL SCIENCE, 2016, 10 (04) :683-709
[2]   The impact of economic sanctions on international trade: How do threatened sanctions compare with imposed sanctions? [J].
Afesorgbor, Sylvanus Kwaku .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2019, 56 :11-26
[3]   The Impact of Economic Sanctions on Income Inequality of Target States [J].
Afesorgbor, Sylvanus Kwaku ;
Mahadevan, Renuka .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2016, 83 :1-11
[4]  
Aflaki S., 2015, Social Science Electronic Publishing, V5, P6393
[5]  
Ahmadi A, 2018, GLOB TRADE CUST J, V13, P198
[6]  
Alhadid A Y., 2014, International Journal of Business and Management, V9, P51, DOI [DOI 10.5539/IJBM.V9N7P51, 10.5539/ijbm.v9n7p51]
[7]  
Antonietti Roberto., 2015, Economia e Politica Industriale, V42, P93, DOI [DOI 10.1007/S40812-014-0007-9, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40812-014-0007-9]
[8]   Impact of globalization The ability of less developed countries' (LDCs') firms to cope with opportunities and challenges [J].
Awuah, Gabriel Baffour ;
Amal, Mohamed .
EUROPEAN BUSINESS REVIEW, 2011, 23 (01) :120-+
[9]   Multilateral Versus Unilateral Sanctions Reconsidered: A Test Using New Data [J].
Bapat, Navin A. ;
Morgan, T. Clifton .
INTERNATIONAL STUDIES QUARTERLY, 2009, 53 (04) :1075-1094
[10]   Religion and income: Heterogeneity between countries [J].
Bettendorf, L. ;
Dijkgraaf, E. .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2010, 74 (1-2) :12-29