Towards the development of a system-wide quality improvement maturity model: a synthesis using systematic review and expert opinion

被引:4
作者
Akmal, Adeel [1 ,2 ]
Podgorodnichenko, Nataliya [3 ]
Greatbanks, Richard [4 ]
Foote, Jeff [4 ]
Stokes, Tim [1 ,5 ]
Gauld, Robin [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Otago, Dept Gen Practice & Rural Hlth, Dunedin, New Zealand
[2] Univ Otago, Ctr Hlth Syst & Technol, Dunedin, New Zealand
[3] Univ Otago, Otago Business Sch, DBA, Dunedin, New Zealand
[4] Univ Otago, Otago Business Sch, Dept Management, Dunedin, New Zealand
[5] Univ Otago, Otago Business Sch, Ctr Hlth Syst & Technol, Dunedin, New Zealand
关键词
New Zealand; Systematic review; Health care; Lean six sigma; Quality improvement; Maturity model; JUST-IN-TIME; TOYOTA PRODUCTION SYSTEM; SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT; WARD RELEASING TIME; HEALTH-CARE; LEAN THINKING; 6; SIGMA; ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE; IMPLEMENTATION; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1108/IJLSS-06-2021-0107
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Purpose The various quality improvement (QI) frameworks and maturity models described in the health services literature consider some aspects of QI while excluding others. This paper aims to present a concerted attempt to create a quality improvement maturity model (QIMM) derived from holistic principles underlying the successful implementation of system-wide QI programmes. Design/methodology/approach A hybrid methodology involving a systematic review (Phase 1) of over 270 empirical research articles and books developed the basis for the proposed QIMM. It was followed by expert interviews to refine the core constructs and ground the proposed QIMM in contemporary QI practice (Phase 2). The experts included academics in two academic conferences and 59 QI managers from the New Zealand health-care system. In-depth interviews were conducted with QI managers to ascertain their views on the QIMM and its applicability in their respective health organisations (HOs). Findings The QIMM consists of four dimensions of organisational maturity, namely, strategic, process, supply chain and philosophical maturity. These dimensions progress through six stages, namely, identification, ad-hoc, formal, process-driven, optimised enterprise and finally a way of life. The application of the QIMM by the QI managers revealed that the scope of QI and the breadth of the principles adopted by the QI managers and their HOs in New Zealand is limited. Practical implications The importance of QI in health systems cannot be overstated. The proposed QIMM can help HOs diagnose their current state and provide a guide to action achieving a desirable state of quality improvement maturity. This QIMM avoids reliance on any single QI methodology. HOs - using the QIMM - should retain full control over the process of selecting any QI methodology or may even cherry-pick principles to suit their needs as long as they understand and appreciate the true nature and scope of quality overstated. The proposed QIMM can help HOs diagnose their current state and provide a guide to action achieving a desirable state of quality improvement maturity. This QIMM avoids reliance on any single QI methodology. HOs - using the QIMM - should retain full control over the process of selecting any QI methodology or may even cherry-pick principles to suit their needs as long as they understand and appreciate the true nature and scope of quality. Originality/value This paper contributes new knowledge by presenting a maturity model with an integrated set of quality principles for HOs and their extended supply networks.
引用
收藏
页码:503 / 540
页数:38
相关论文
共 164 条
[1]   Critical success factors of Lean Six Sigma deployment: a current review [J].
Abu Bakar, Fairul Anwar ;
Subari, Khairanum ;
Daril, Mohd Amran Mohd .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LEAN SIX SIGMA, 2015, 6 (04) :339-348
[2]   Transparency in Healthcare Reporting: The Case of External Contractors and Consultants in New Zealand's Healthcare System [J].
Akmal, Adeel ;
Gauld, Robin ;
Penno, Erin .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLICY AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 11 (09) :1642-1649
[3]   Why is Quality Improvement so Challenging? A Viable Systems Model Perspective to Understand the Frustrations of Healthcare Quality Improvement Managers [J].
Akmal, Adeel ;
Podgorodnichenko, Nataliya ;
Foote, Jeff ;
Greatbanks, Richard ;
Stokes, Tim ;
Gauld, Robin .
HEALTH POLICY, 2021, 125 (05) :658-664
[4]   Understanding resistance in lean implementation in healthcare environments: an institutional logics perspective [J].
Akmal, Adeel ;
Foote, Jeff ;
Podgorodnichenko, Nataliya ;
Greatbanks, Richard ;
Gauld, Robin .
PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 2022, 33 (04) :356-370
[5]   Lean thinking in healthcare - Findings from a systematic literature network and bibliometric analysis [J].
Akmal, Adeel ;
Greatbanks, Richard ;
Foote, Jeff .
HEALTH POLICY, 2020, 124 (06) :615-627
[6]   Readiness factors for lean implementation in healthcare settings - a literature review [J].
Al-Balushi, S. ;
Sohal, A. S. ;
Singh, P. J. ;
Al Hajri, A. ;
Al Farsi, Y. M. ;
Al Abri, R. .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 28 (02) :135-153
[7]   Using Lean Management to Reduce Emergency Department Length of Stay for Medicine Admissions [J].
Allaudeen, Nazima ;
Vashi, Anita ;
Breckenridge, Julia S. ;
Haji-Sheikhi, Farnoosh ;
Wagner, Sarah ;
Posley, Keith A. ;
Asch, Steven M. .
QUALITY MANAGEMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2017, 26 (02) :91-96
[8]   New JIT, New Management Technology Principle: Surpassing JIT [J].
Amasaka, Kakuro .
CENTERIS 2014 - CONFERENCE ON ENTERPRISE INFORMATION SYSTEMS / PROJMAN 2014 - INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PROJECT MANAGEMENT / HCIST 2014 - INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES, 2014, 16 :1135-1145
[9]   Lean thinking in hospitals: is there a cure for the absence of evidence? A systematic review of reviews [J].
Andersen, Hege ;
Rovik, Kjell Arne ;
Ingebrigtsen, Tor .
BMJ OPEN, 2014, 4 (01)
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2002, The Rational unified process and the capability maturity Model