Comparison of the immunogenicity and safety of Euvichol-Plus with Shanchol in healthy Indian adults and children: an open-label, randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority, parallel-group, phase 3 trial

被引:1
作者
Shah, Sanket [1 ]
Nandy, Ranjan Kumar [2 ]
Sethi, Shaily S. [1 ]
Chavan, Bhakti [1 ]
Pathak, Sarang [1 ]
Dutta, Shanta [2 ]
Rai, Sanjay [3 ]
Singh, Chandramani [4 ]
Chayal, Vinod [5 ]
Patel, Chintan [6 ]
Kumar, N. Ravi [7 ]
Chavan, Abhishek T. [8 ]
Chawla, Amit [9 ]
Singh, Anit [10 ]
Roy, Anupriya Khare [10 ]
Singh, Nidhi [10 ]
Baik, Yeong Ok [11 ]
Lee, Youngjin [11 ]
Park, Youngran [11 ]
Jeong, Kyung Ho [11 ]
Ahmed, Syed [1 ,12 ]
机构
[1] Techinvent Lifecare Pvt Ltd, Mumbai, India
[2] Natl Inst Cholera & Enter Dis, Indian Council Med Res, Kolkata, India
[3] All India Inst Med Sci, New Delhi, India
[4] All India Inst Med Sci, Patna, India
[5] Pandit Bhagwat Dayal Sharma Post Grad Inst Med Sci, Rohtak, India
[6] Aatman Hosp, Ahmadabad, India
[7] Niloufer Hosp, Hyderabad, India
[8] Jeevan Rekha Hosp, Belagavi, India
[9] Prakhar Hosp, Kanpur, India
[10] Clin Res Network India, Noida, India
[11] EuBiologics Co Ltd, Seoul, South Korea
[12] Techinvent Lifecare Private Ltd, 1004 Summit Business Pk,Off WEH Metro Stn, Mumbai 400093, India
来源
LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH - SOUTHEAST ASIA | 2023年 / 19卷
关键词
Cholera; Euvichol-Plus; Immunogenicity; India; Non-inferiority; Oral cholera vaccines; Phase; 3; Safety; Shanchol; ORAL CHOLERA VACCINE; WHOLE-CELL; BIVALENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.lansea.2023.100256
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Considering the cholera menace in India and to seek licensure of the oral cholera vaccine (OCV), Euvichol-Plus, we conducted a clinical trial to compare the immunogenicity and safety of Euvichol-Plus with Shanchol in healthy Indian adults and children.Methods This phase 3, open-label, multicentre, randomised, non-inferiority, parallel-group, comparative study was conducted at seven sites across India involving 416 healthy adults (aged >= 18-60 years) and children (aged >= 1 to <18 years). Healthy individuals who agreed to participate through a voluntary written informed consent form along with oral or written assent (for children aged 7-18 years) were included. No assent was required for those <7 years, as consent was given by the legally acceptable representatives (LAR). Participants were randomised 1:1 to receive two doses of either Euvichol-Plus or Shanchol orally, 14 days apart. The first dose (1.5 ml) was administered on visit 1, and the second dose at 2 weeks after the first dose during visit 2. Participants were followed up telephonically for 3 consecutive days after each visit and returned for final assessment at 2 weeks after the second dose (visit 3). Blood samples were collected for immunogenicity assessment, and safety analyses were done during all the visits. The primary immunogenicity endpoint was the percentage of participants with >= 4-fold increase in anti-Vibrio cholerae (V. cholerae) O1 Ogawa and O1 Inaba (vibriocidal) antibody titres at 2 weeks after the second dose as compared to baseline titres prior to dosing. The secondary immunogenicity endpoints included the percentage of participants with >= 4-fold increase in anti-V. cholerae O139 antibody titres at 2 weeks after the second dose as compared to baseline titres, and geometric mean titres (GMT) and geometric mean ratios (GMR) as measured by anti-V. cholerae O1 Ogawa, O1 Inaba, and O139 antibody titres at 2 weeks after the second dose as compared to baseline titres. The safety endpoints included assessment of solicited, unsolicited adverse events (AEs), and serious adverse events (SAEs). The clinical trial was registered with the Clinical Trials Registry of India (CTRI/2021/08/035344).Findings The study was performed in two age cohorts: cohort 1 (aged >= 18-60 years, 208 participants [104 in Euvichol-Plus group and 104 in Shanchol group]), and cohort 2 (aged >= 1 to <18 years, 208 participants [104 in Euvichol-Plus group and 104 in Shanchol group]). A total of 414 participants (Euvichol-Plus: 206 and Shanchol: 208) who completed the study (intention-to-treat and per-protocol set) were analysed to compare the vibriocidal titre as an index for immunogenicity. At 2 weeks after the second dose, the percentage of participants in the Euvichol-Plus group who reported a >= 4-fold increase in anti-V. cholerae antibody titres were 68.93% (O1 Ogawa) [95% CI 62.13%-75.18%], 66.02% (O1 Inaba) [95% CI 59.11%-72.46%], and 59.71% (O139) [95% CI 52.67%-66.47%] as compared to 63.94% (O1 Ogawa) [95% CI 57.01%-70.47%], 65.87% (O1 Inaba) [95% CI 58.99%-72.28%], and 56.25% (O139) [95% CI 49.22%-63.10%] in the Shanchol group. The lower limit of 95% CI for treatment difference for all the antibody titres was >= 10% (non-inferiority margin), demonstrating that Euvichol-Plus was non-inferior to Shanchol. The post-vaccination GMT (Day 14 and 28) were more than the pre-vaccination GMT for all three serotypes in both groups. The GMR obtained for Euvichol-Plus over Shanchol for O1 Ogawa, O1 Inaba, and O139 serotypes was >1, indicating non-inferiority of Euvichol-Plus to Shanchol. The safety cohort included 416 participants. Headache was the most common solicited AE, whereas cold and cough were the most common unsolicited AEs in both groups.Interpretation Euvichol-Plus appears to be non-inferior to Shanchol in terms of immunogenicity and safety in healthy Indian adults and children.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Safety and immunogenicity of a reformulated Vietnamese bivalent killed, whole-cell, oral cholera vaccine in adults
    Anh, Dang Duc
    Canh, Do Gia
    Lopez, Anna Lena
    Thiem, Vu Dinh
    Long, Phan Thi
    Son, Nguyen Hong
    Deen, Jacqueline
    von Seidlein, Lorenz
    Carbis, Rodney
    Han, Seung Hyun
    Shin, Seong Hye
    Attridge, Stephen
    Holmgren, Jan
    Clemens, John
    [J]. VACCINE, 2007, 25 (06) : 1149 - 1155
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2020, OCV vaccine production update and vaccine use in hotspots
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2018, Cholera supply and procurement Roadmap
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2022, Cholera
  • [5] A randomized, non-inferiority trial comparing two bivalent killed, whole cell, oral cholera vaccines (Euvichol vs Shanchol) in the Philippines
    Baik, Yeong Ok
    Choi, Seuk Keun
    Olveda, Remigio M.
    Espos, Roberto A.
    Ligsay, Antonio D.
    Montellano, May B.
    Yeam, Jong Sun
    Yang, Jae Seung
    Park, Ju Yeon
    Kim, Deok Ryun
    Desai, Sachin N.
    Singh, Ajit Pal
    Kim, Ick Young
    Kim, Chan Wha
    Park, Sue-nie
    [J]. VACCINE, 2015, 33 (46) : 6360 - 6365
  • [6] Safety and Immunogenicity Assessment of an Oral Cholera Vaccine through Phase I Clinical Trial in Korea
    Baik, Young Ok
    Choi, Seuk Keun
    Kim, Jae Woo
    Yang, Jae Seung
    Kim, Ick Young
    Kim, Chan Wha
    Hong, Jang Hee
    [J]. JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2014, 29 (04) : 494 - 501
  • [7] Challenges for Programmatic Implementation of Oral Cholera Vaccine in India
    Chakraborty, Debjit
    Kanungo, Suman
    Nandy, Ranjan Kumar
    Deb, Alok Kumar
    Mukhopadhyay, Asish Kumar
    Dutta, Shanta
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2021, 224 : S754 - S758
  • [8] Cholera vaccines, 2017, WHO position paper
  • [9] Comparison of immune responses to a killed bivalent whole cell oral cholera vaccine between endemic and less endemic settings
    Desai, Sachin N.
    Akalu, Zenebe
    Teferi, Mekonnen
    Manna, Byomkesh
    Teshome, Samuel
    Park, Ju Yeon
    Yang, Jae Seung
    Kim, Deok Ryun
    Kanungo, Suman
    Digilio, Laura
    [J]. TROPICAL MEDICINE & INTERNATIONAL HEALTH, 2016, 21 (02) : 194 - 201
  • [10] A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial Evaluating Safety and Immunogenicity of the Killed, Bivalent, Whole-Cell Oral Cholera Vaccine in Ethiopia
    Desai, Sachin N.
    Akalu, Zenebe
    Teshome, Samuel
    Teferi, Mekonnen
    Yamuah, Lawrence
    Kim, Deok Ryun
    Yang, Jae Seung
    Hussein, Jemal
    Park, Ju Yeong
    Jang, Mi Seon
    Mesganaw, Chalachew
    Taye, Hawnlt
    Beyene, Demissew
    Bedru, Ahmed
    Singh, Ajit Pal
    Wierzba, Thomas F.
    Aseffa, Abraham
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE, 2015, 93 (03) : 527 - 533