Systematic AI Support for Decision-Making in the Healthcare Sector: Obstacles and Success Factors

被引:12
|
作者
Bertl, Markus [1 ]
Ross, Peeter [1 ]
Draheim, Dirk [2 ]
机构
[1] Tallinn Univ Technol, Dept Hlth Technol, Akad tee 15a, EE-12616 Tallinn, Estonia
[2] Tallinn Univ Technol, Dept Software Sci, Informat Syst Grp, Akad tee 15a, EE-12616 Tallinn, Estonia
关键词
Decision support systems; Healthcare information systems; Health informatics; Delivery of health care; Artificial intelligence (AI); Machine learning (ML); Decision-making; GAIA-X; e-health; Digital health; INFORMATION-SYSTEMS; IMPLEMENTATION; ACCEPTANCE; SEEKING;
D O I
10.1016/j.hlpt.2023.100748
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Currently, health care is expert-centric, especially with regard to decision-making. Innovations such as artificial intelligence (AI) or interconnected electronic health records (EHRs) suffer from low adoption rates. In the rare cases of technically successful implementation, they often result in inefficient or error-prone processes. Aim & Methods: This paper explores the state of the art in AI-based digital decision support systems (DDSSs). To overcome the low adoption rates, we propose a systematic strategy for bringing DDSS research into clinical practice based on a design science approach. DDSSs can transform health care to be more innovative, patientcentric, accurate and efficient. We contribute by providing a framework for the successful development, evaluation and analysis of systems for AI-based decision-making. This framework is then evaluated using focus group interviews. Results: Centred around our framework, we define a systematic approach for the use of AI in health care. Our systematic AI support approach highlights essential perspectives on DDSSs for systematic development and analysis. The aim is to develop and promote robust and optimal practices for clinical investigation and evaluation of DDSS in order to encourage their adoption rates. The framework contains the following dimensions: disease, data, technology, user groups, validation, decision and maturity. Conclusion: DDSSs focusing on only one framework dimension are generally not successful; therefore, we propose to consider each framework dimension during analysis, design, implementation and evaluation so as to raise the number of DDSSs used in clinical practice. Public Interest Summary: The digital transformation of the healthcare sector creates the potential for the sector to be more accurate, efficient and patient-centric using AI, or so-called digital decision support systems. In this research, we explore why these systems are needed and how they can be successfully implemented in clinical practice. For this, we propose a systematic approach based on our conceptual framework. Against this background, we present our vision for further advancing these technologies. We see our systematic AI support as a primary driver, with the possibility to facilitate the much-needed breakthrough of decision support systems in health care.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Patient and healthcare professional factors influencing end-of-life decision-making during critical illness: A systematic review
    Frost, David W.
    Cook, Deborah J.
    Heyland, Daren K.
    Fowler, Robert A.
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2011, 39 (05) : 1174 - 1189
  • [32] Deciding to support violence: An empirical examination of systematic decision-making, activism, and support for political violence
    Becker, Michael H.
    CRIMINOLOGY & CRIMINAL JUSTICE, 2021, 21 (05) : 669 - 686
  • [33] Decision-Making in Healthcare. A Bibliometric Exploration
    Olariu, Ana Alexandra
    Breazu, Andreea
    Popa, Stefan Catalin
    Popa, Catalina Florentina
    Caruceru, Nicoleta
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 2024, 18 (01): : 3242 - 3254
  • [34] A systematic review of decision-making in remanufacturing
    Rizova, Mirena Isaeva
    Wong, T. C.
    Ijomah, Winifred
    COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 147 (147)
  • [35] Evaluation of Interrelationships between Critical Success Factors of IT/IS Projects in the Healthcare Sector
    Schonberger, Marius
    Cirjevskis, Andrejs
    SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC GROWTH, EDUCATION EXCELLENCE, AND INNOVATION MANAGEMENT THROUGH VISION 2020, VOLS I-VII, 2017, : 331 - +
  • [36] Which Nontraditional Outcomes Should Be Measured in Healthcare Decision-Making in Schizophrenia? A Systematic Review
    Vieta, Ana
    Badia, Xavier
    Alvarez, Enric
    Sacristan, Jose A.
    PERSPECTIVES IN PSYCHIATRIC CARE, 2012, 48 (04) : 198 - 207
  • [37] The Impact of Big Data Analytics on Decision-Making Within the Government Sector
    Faridoon, Laila
    Liu, Wei
    Spence, Crawford
    BIG DATA, 2024,
  • [38] Horizontal collaboration in the freight transport sector: barrier and decision-making frameworks
    Karam, Ahmed
    Reinau, Kristian Hegner
    Ostergaard, Christian Richter
    EUROPEAN TRANSPORT RESEARCH REVIEW, 2021, 13 (01)
  • [39] Factors that Underpin the Delivery of Effective Decision-making Support for People with Cognitive Disability
    Douglas, Jacinta
    Bigby, Christine
    Knox, Lucy
    Browning, Michelle
    RESEARCH AND PRACTICE IN INTELLECTUAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, 2015, 2 (01) : 37 - 44
  • [40] Infosphere, Datafication, and Decision-Making Processes in the AI Era
    Andrea Lavazza
    Mirko Farina
    Topoi, 2023, 42 : 843 - 856