The impact of timber regulations on timber and timber product trade

被引:10
作者
Apeti, Ablam Estel [1 ,2 ]
N'Doua, Bossoma Doriane [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gottingen, Gottingen, Germany
[2] Univ Orleans, Univ Clermont Auvergne, LEO, F-45067 Orleans, France
[3] Univ Bordeaux, BSE Bordeaux Sch Econ, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
关键词
Regulations; Timber; Trade; Entropy balancing; AMAZON DEFORESTATION; PROTECTED AREAS; DETERMINANTS; SANCTIONS; ECONOMICS; PROGRAM; MARKET;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107943
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
To promote legal imports of timber and timber products, some countries, such as the United States, Australia, the Republic of Korea, and members of the European Union (EU), have adopted timber trade regulations. The implementation of these regulations is the result of the increase in illegal logging and its negative impact on the environment, biodiversity, and climate change. These regulations play an important role in international trade and are part of an effort to combat illegal logging and its consequences, such as deforestation. This study analyzes the impact of the implementation of these regulations on imports of timber and timber products from timber-producing and timber-processing countries with a significant share of illegal logging over the period 1995-2019. To do so, we use a method combining the gravity approach with a matching technique such as entropy balancing. To test the robustness of our results, we estimate alternative specifications and use alternative methods such as the gravity model and Ordinary Least Squares (OLS). We find that the implementation of these regulations has a negative effect on imports of timber and timber products. This reduction in imports is mainly more significant for timber and timber products such as pulp and wood furniture and can also vary according to the country implementing the regulation..
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 97 条
[1]   Semiparametric difference-in-differences estimators [J].
Abadie, A .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2005, 72 (01) :1-19
[2]   Avoiding legality: Timber producers' strategies and motivations under FLEGT in Ghana and Indonesia [J].
Acheampong, Emmanuel ;
Maryudi, Ahmad .
FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2020, 111
[3]   A comparative analysis of the institutional capacity of FLEGT VPA in Cameroon, the Central African Republic, Ghana, Liberia, and the Republic of the Congo [J].
Adams, Marshall Alhassan ;
Kayira, Jean ;
Tegegne, Yitagesu Tekle ;
Gruber, James S. .
FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2020, 112 (112)
[4]   The impact of economic sanctions on international trade: How do threatened sanctions compare with imposed sanctions? [J].
Afesorgbor, Sylvanus Kwaku .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2019, 56 :11-26
[5]   Illegal logging in Cameroon: Causes and the path forward [J].
Alemagi, Dieudonne ;
Kozak, Robert A. .
FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2010, 12 (08) :554-561
[6]  
Allcott H, 2015, Q J ECON, V130, P1117, DOI 10.1093/qje/qjv015
[7]   Neighborhood effects in the Brazilian Amazonia: Protected areas and deforestation [J].
Amin, A. ;
Choumert-Nkolo, J. ;
Combes, J. -L. ;
Motel, P. Combes ;
Kere, E. N. ;
Ongono-Olinga, J. -G. ;
Schwartz, S. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 93 :272-288
[8]   Gravity with gravitas: A solution to the border puzzle [J].
Anderson, JE ;
van Wincoop, E .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2003, 93 (01) :170-192
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2012, World Forest Area Still on The Decline
[10]   Sovereign debt default and inequality [J].
Apeti, Ablam Estel .
INDUSTRIAL AND CORPORATE CHANGE, 2023, 32 (02) :502-521