Gait training with robotic exoskeleton assisted rehabilitation system in patients with incomplete traumatic and non-traumatic spinal cord injury: A pilot study and review of literature

被引:2
作者
Gupta, Anupam [1 ]
Prakash, Naveen B. [1 ]
Honavar, Preethi R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Mental Hlth & Neuro Sci NIMHANS, Dept Neurol Rehabil, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
关键词
Exoskeleton robot; gait training; incomplete spinal cord injury; locomotion; WALKING; EXPERIENCE; LESIONS; PEOPLE; ADULTS; LIFE;
D O I
10.4103/aian.aian_1075_21
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: This pilot study aimed to assess the safety and feasibility of robotic gait training and its' effects on gait parameters in individuals with incomplete motor spinal cord injury-SCI (AIS C and AIS D). Methods: The study was conducted in a tertiary research center with indigenously developed Robotic Exoskeleton Assisted Rehabilitation Systems (REARS). Primary outcome measures used were the ten-meter walk test (10MWT), two-minute walk test (2MWT), six-minute walk test (6MWT), the timed up and go test (TUG), the walking index for spinal cord injury II (WISCI II), and the spinal cord independence measure version III (SCIM III) at baseline, 12 sessions, and after 24 sessions (endpoint) of training. At baseline, individuals who could not perform 10MWT, TUG, and 6MWT were grouped in G1 for analysis. Participants in G2 were able to perform all the tests at baseline. Results: The median (interquartile range [IQR]) age and duration of illness was 41 (24) years and 167 (147) days, respectively. Five out of seven participants had non-traumatic etiology and five were males. After completing training, participants in G1 were able to complete the 10MWT, 6MWT, and TUG, and the mean (SD) scores were 0.2 m/s (0.2), 66.3 m (61.2) and 113.3 s (117.4), respectively. Participants in G2 could perform the TUG test 13.5 s faster at the end of the study (11.9 s vs 25.4 s). The minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for TUG was 10.8 s. In G2, the pre-post training change in mean score of 10MWT and 6MWT was 0.11 m/s and 42 m, respectively; these values approached the MCID for these measures. None of the participants had any injury during training. Conclusions: Robotic gait training with REARS is safe and feasible. Such training may lead to an improvement in balance and walking capacity.
引用
收藏
页码:S26 / S31
页数:6
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Overground walking with a robotic exoskeleton elicits trunk muscle activity in people with high-thoracic motor-complete spinal cord injury [J].
Alamro, Raed A. ;
Chisholm, Amanda E. ;
Williams, Alison M. M. ;
Carpenter, Mark G. ;
Lam, Tania .
JOURNAL OF NEUROENGINEERING AND REHABILITATION, 2018, 15
[2]   Incidental bilateral calcaneal fractures following overground walking with a wearable robotic exoskeleton in a wheelchair user with a chronic spinal cord injury: is zero risk possible? [J].
Bass, A. ;
Morin, S. N. ;
Vermette, M. ;
Aubertin-Leheudre, M. ;
Gagnon, D. H. .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 31 (05) :1007-1011
[3]   Gait training after spinal cord injury: safety, feasibility and gait function following 8 weeks of training with the exoskeletons from Ekso Bionics [J].
Baunsgaard, Carsten Bach ;
Nissen, Ulla Vig ;
Brust, Anne Katrin ;
Frotzler, Angela ;
Ribeill, Cornelia ;
Kalke, Yorck-Bernhard ;
Leon, Natacha ;
Gomez, Belen ;
Samuelsson, Kersti ;
Antepohl, Wolfram ;
Holmstrom, Ulrika ;
Marklund, Niklas ;
Glott, Thomas ;
Opheim, Arve ;
Benito, Jesus ;
Murillo, Narda ;
Nachtegaal, Janneke ;
Faber, Willemijn ;
Biering-Sorensen, Fin .
SPINAL CORD, 2018, 56 (02) :106-116
[4]   Robotic gait rehabilitation and substitution devices in neurological disorders: where are we now? [J].
Calabro, Rocco Salvatore ;
Cacciola, Alberto ;
Berte, Francesco ;
Manuli, Alfredo ;
Leo, Antonino ;
Bramanti, Alessia ;
Naro, Antonino ;
Milardi, Demetrio ;
Bramanti, Placido .
NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2016, 37 (04) :503-514
[5]   Who wants to walk? Preferences for recovery after SCI: a longitudinal and cross-sectional study [J].
Ditunno, P. L. ;
Patrick, M. ;
Stineman, M. ;
Ditunno, J. F. .
SPINAL CORD, 2008, 46 (07) :500-506
[6]   Clinician Perceptions of Robotic Exoskeletons for Locomotor Training After Spinal Cord Injury: A Qualitative Approach [J].
Ehrlich-Jones, Linda ;
Crown, Deborah S. ;
Kinnett-Hopkins, Dominique ;
Field-Fote, Edelle ;
Furbish, Cathy ;
Mummidisetty, Chaithanya K. ;
Bond, Rachel A. ;
Forrest, Gail ;
Jayaraman, Arun ;
Heinemann, Allen W. .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2021, 102 (02) :203-215
[7]   Robotics for Lower Limb Rehabilitation [J].
Esquenazi, Alberto ;
Talaty, Mukul .
PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2019, 30 (02) :385-+
[8]  
Esquenazi Alberto, 2012, Am J Phys Med Rehabil, V91, pS217, DOI 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31826bce18
[9]   Effects of Robot-Assisted Gait Training in Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury: A Meta-analysis [J].
Fang, Chia-Ying ;
Tsai, Jia-Ling ;
Li, Guo-Sheng ;
Lien, Angela Shin-Yu ;
Chang, Ya-Ju .
BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 2020
[10]   Influence of a Locomotor Training Approach on Walking Speed and Distance in People With Chronic Spinal Cord Injury: A Randomized Clinical Trial [J].
Field-Fote, Edelle C. ;
Roach, Kathryn E. .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2011, 91 (01) :48-60