Prototype development of the Mental Health benchmarking Industry Tool for residential aged Care (MHICare Tool): a protocol paper of a two-stage sequential and mixed methods codesign study

被引:1
|
作者
Brimelow, Rachel [1 ]
Brooks, Deborah [1 ]
Sriram, Deepa [1 ]
Burley, Claire [2 ]
Beattie, Elizabeth [3 ]
Byrne, Gerard [4 ]
Dissanayaka, Nadeeka [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Ctr Clin Res UQCCR, Herston, Qld, Australia
[2] Univ New South Wales, Sch Hlth Sci, UNSW Med & Hlth Lifestyle Clin, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] QUT, Sch Nursing, Fac Hlth, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[4] UQ Fac Med, Acad Psychiat, Herston, Qld, Australia
[5] Univ Queensland, Fac Med, Ctr Clin Res, Herston, Qld, Australia
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2024年 / 14卷 / 02期
关键词
mental health; residential aged care; nursing homes; quality indicators; benchmarking tool; changed behaviours; psychological symptoms; BALANCED SCORECARD; CONSENSUS; SERVICES; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078493
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives Current mental health practices for people living in residential aged care (RAC) facilities are poor. In Australia, there are no mechanisms to monitor and promote mental health for people living in RAC, including those who experience changed behaviours and psychological symptoms. The aim of this study is to improve current practices and mental health outcomes for people living in RAC facilities by codesigning a Mental Health benchmarking Industry Tool for residential aged Care (MHICare Tool).Methods A two-stage sequential and mixed methods codesign methodology will be used. Stage 1 will include qualitative interviews and focus groups to engage with residents, family/care partners and RAC staff to ascertain mental healthcare practices and outcomes of greatest significance to them. Adapted concept mapping methods will be used to rank identified issues of concern in order of importance and changeability, and to generate draft quality indicators. Stage 2 will comprise a Delphi procedure to gain the wider consensus of expert panel views (aged care industry, academic, clinical) on the performance indicators to be included, resulting in the codesigned MHICare Tool.Ethics and dissemination This study has been reviewed and approved by the University of Queensland Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/2019002096). This project will be carried out according to the National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research (2007). The study's findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and disseminated at national and international conferences and through social media.Conclusion This protocol reports structured methods to codesign and develop a mental health performance indicator tool for use in Australian RAC.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 2 条
  • [1] The use and usefulness of the Peninsula Health Falls Risk Assessment Tool (PHFRAT) process in residential aged care: a mixed methods study across 25 aged care facilities
    Mercado, Crisostomo Ibarra
    Meulenbroeks, Isabelle
    Huang, Guogui
    Wabe, Nasir
    Seaman, Karla
    Clive, Joanna
    Westbrook, Johanna
    BMC GERIATRICS, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [2] Codesigning a user-centred digital psychoeducational tool for youth mental well-being with families in Canada: study protocol for a sequential exploratory mixed methods study
    Moss, Stephana Julia
    Racine, Nicole
    Ahmed, Sofia
    Birnie, Kathryn
    Cherak, Michal S.
    Curran, Janet A.
    Halperin, Donna
    Halperin, Scott A.
    Harley, Micaela
    Hu, Jia
    Leppan, Laura
    Nickel, Angie
    Russell, Kristine
    Solis, May
    Smith, Stacie
    Soo, Andrea
    Stelfox, Maia
    Tutelman, Perri R.
    Stelfox, Henry Thomas
    Fiest, Kirsten M.
    Leigh, Jeanna Parsons
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (06):