Mutual trust through the looking glass: The protection of children's fundamental rights in EU return proceedings

被引:3
作者
Bartolini, Silvia [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ St Louis Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
来源
ONATI SOCIO-LEGAL SERIES | 2024年 / 14卷 / 01期
关键词
Area of freedom; security and justice; Brussels IIa bis; mutual trust; best interests of the child; EU fundamental rights; ABDUCTION; JUSTICE; LAW;
D O I
10.35295/OSLS.IISL/0000-0000-0000-1349
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
The principle of mutual trust underpins EU proceedings for the return of the child following abduction. On such a basis, the courts of the Member State of refuge shall trust the courts of the Member State where the child was habitually resident immediately before the abduction being willing and capable to protect the EU fundamental rights of the child concerned. Therefore, they should not refrain from enforcing a certified judgment requiring the immediate return of the child, even in situations where there is a clear risk that the return is contrary to that child's best interests. The purpose of this article is to demonstrate that there is a necessity - in the field of EU proceedings for the return of the child following abduction - to move beyond absolute trust, in order to ensure adequate protection of the children concerned.
引用
收藏
页码:230 / 256
页数:27
相关论文
共 46 条
[31]  
GUILD Elspeth., 2004, European Law Review, V29, P198
[32]   Brussels II bis: successes and suggested improvements [J].
Kruger, Thalia ;
Samyn, Liselot .
JOURNAL OF PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW, 2016, 12 (01) :132-168
[33]  
Lazic V., 2016, FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS I, P161
[34]  
Lenaerts K., 2013, Jurisprudence, V20, P1302
[35]  
Lenaerts K, 2017, COMMON MKT LAW REV, V54, P805, DOI 10.54648/cola2017061
[36]  
Mancano L, 2019, COMMON MKT LAW REV, V56, P61
[37]   The European Court of Human Rights and the Hague Child Abduction Convention: Prioritising Return or Reflection? [J].
McEleavy P. .
Netherlands International Law Review, 2015, 62 (3) :365-405
[38]  
Mitsilegas, 2019, COURT JUSTICE EUROPE, P421
[39]   The recast of the Brussels IIa Regulation: the sweet and sour fruits of unanimity [J].
Musseva B. .
ERA Forum, 2020, 21 (1) :129-142
[40]  
N.S. v Secretary of State for the Home Department and M. E. and Others Refugee Applications Commissioner and Minister for Justice Equality and Law Reform, 2011, Joined Cases C-411/10 and C-493/10. ECLI:EU:C:2011:865