The 2016 US presidential election, opinion polls and the stock market

被引:0
作者
Upadhyaya, Kamal [1 ]
Nag, Raja [2 ]
Ejara, Demissew [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ New Haven, Dept Econ & Business Analyt, West Haven, CT 06516 USA
[2] New York Inst Technol, Dept Accounting & Financial Studies, Old Westbury, NY USA
[3] Univ New Haven, Dept Accounting Finance & Mkt, West Haven, CT USA
关键词
Clinton; Trump; Presidential election; Opinion poll; Stock market; E44; G10;
D O I
10.1108/JFEP-10-2023-0310
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to study the impact of the 2016 presidential election polls on the stock market.Design/methodology/approachThe empirical model includes daily stock returns as the dependent variable and past asset prices, 10-year treasury rates, opinion polls and VIX (market uncertainty) as explanatory variables with a one-year lag. The model was estimated using two sets of daily polling data: from July 1, 2015, to November 8, 2016, and from June 1, 2016, to November 8, 2016. Additional descriptive statistics, such as means and standard deviations, were also calculated.FindingsThe estimated results did not reveal any statistically significant effects of opinion polls in favor of one candidate over another on stock returns. Simple statistical tests, however, show that the market performed better when Trump held a polling advantage over Clinton.Originality/valueTo the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the only study that has examined the effects of the 2016 presidential election polls on the US stock market. This study adds value to the understanding of the relationship between election polls and the stock market in the USA.
引用
收藏
页码:194 / 204
页数:11
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   Do investors assess the credibility of campaign commitments? [J].
Benton, Allyson Lucinda .
POLITICAL RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 2008, 61 (03) :403-418
[2]  
Brander J.A., 1989, 3073 NBER
[3]  
Chan Y.-c., 1996, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, V4, P259, DOI DOI 10.1016/0927-538X(96)00014-5
[4]   Prediction Markets and Election Polling: Granger Causality Tests Using InTrade and RealClearPolitics Data [J].
Duquette C. ;
Mixon F.G. ;
Jr. ;
Cebula R.J. ;
Upadhyaya K.P. .
Atlantic Economic Journal, 2014, 42 (4) :357-366
[5]  
Ejara D., 2012, APPL FINANCIAL EC, V22, P437
[6]   POLITICAL OPINION POLLS AND THE STOCK-MARKET [J].
IOANNIDIS, C ;
THOMPSON, RS .
MANAGERIAL AND DECISION ECONOMICS, 1986, 7 (04) :267-271
[7]   Market responses to politics - The rise of Lula and the decline of the Brazilian stock market [J].
Jensen, NM ;
Schmith, S .
COMPARATIVE POLITICAL STUDIES, 2005, 38 (10) :1245-1270
[8]   Can we insure against political uncertainty? Evidence from the US stock market [J].
Mattozzi, Andrea .
PUBLIC CHOICE, 2008, 137 (1-2) :43-55
[9]   Do opinion polls on government preference influence stock returns? [J].
Narayan, Paresh Kumar ;
Narayan, Seema .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL AND EXPERIMENTAL FINANCE, 2021, 30
[10]   Stock market co-movement in Latin America and the US: evidence from a new approach [J].
Vatsa, Puneet ;
Basnet, Hem ;
Mixon, Frank .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMIC POLICY, 2022, 14 (02) :162-171