Nursing-sensitive quality indicators for quality improvement in Norwegian nursing homes - a modified Delphi study

被引:0
作者
Tevik, Kjerstin [1 ,2 ]
Helvik, Anne-Sofie [1 ,2 ]
Stensvik, Geir-Tore [1 ]
Nordberg, Marion S. [1 ,3 ]
Nakrem, Sigrid [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol NTNU, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Dept Publ Hlth & Nursing, Trondheim, Norway
[2] Vestfold Hosp Trust, Norwegian Natl Ctr Ageing & Hlth, Tonsberg, Norway
[3] Univ Trondheim Hosp, St Olavs Hosp, Dept Geriatr, Trondheim, Norway
[4] Royal Melbourne Hosp, Natl Ageing Res Inst, 34-54 Poplar Rd, Parkville, Vic 3050, Australia
关键词
Clinical indicators; Consensus; Delphi process; Dementia; Geriatric nursing; interRAI LTCF; Long-term care; Quality indicators; Quality of healthcare; RAI-MDS; MINIMUM DATA SET; RESIDENT ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT; TERM-CARE FACILITIES; OF-CARE; COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT; PAIN SCALE; CONSENSUS METHODS; OLDER-ADULTS; PREVALENCE; SYMPTOMS;
D O I
10.1186/s12913-023-10088-4
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundUse of nursing-sensitive quality indicators (QIs) is one way to monitor the quality of care in nursing homes (NHs). The aim of this study was to develop a consensus list of nursing-sensitive QIs for Norwegian NHs.MethodsA narrative literature review followed by a non-in-person, two-round, six-step modified Delphi survey was conducted. A five-member project group was established to draw up a list of nursing-sensitive QIs from a preliminary list of 24 QIs selected from Minimum Data Set (2.0) (MDS) and the international Resident Assessment Instrument for Long-Term Care Facilities (interRAI LTCF). We included scientific experts (researchers), clinical experts (healthcare professionals in NHs), and experts of experience (next-of-kin of NH residents). The experts rated nursing-sensitive QIs in two rounds on a seven-point Likert scale. Consensus was based on median value and level of dispersion. Analyses were conducted for four groups: 1) all experts, 2) scientific experts, 3) clinical experts, and 4) experts of experience.ResultsThe project group drew up a list of 20 nursing-sensitive QIs. Nineteen QIs were selected from MDS/interRAI LTCF and one ('systematic medication review') from the Norwegian quality assessment system IPLOS ('Statistics linked to individual needs of care'). In the first and second Delphi round, 44 experts (13 researchers, 17 healthcare professionals, 14 next-of-kin) and 28 experts (8 researchers, 10 healthcare professionals, 10 next-of-kin) participated, respectively. The final consensus list consisted of 16 nursing-sensitive QIs, which were ranked in this order by the 'all expert group': 1) systematic medication review, 2) pressure ulcers, 3) behavioral symptoms, 4) pain, 5) dehydration, 6) oral/dental health problems, 7) urinary tract infection, 8) fecal impaction, 9) depression, 10) use of aids that inhibit freedom of movement, 11) participation in activities of interest, 12) participation in social activities, 13) decline in activities of daily living, 14) weight loss, 15) falls, and 16) hearing loss without the use of hearing aids.ConclusionsMultidisciplinary experts were able to reach consensus on 16 nursing-sensitive QIs. The results from this study can be used to implement QIs in Norwegian NHs, which can improve the quality of care.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 135 条
  • [1] Pain in dementia
    Achterberg, Wilco
    Lautenbacher, Stefan
    Husebo, Bettina
    Erdal, Ane
    Herr, Keela
    [J]. PAIN REPORTS, 2020, 5 (01) : E803
  • [2] Pain in European long-term care facilities: Cross-national study in Finland, Italy and the Netherlands
    Achterberg, Wilco P.
    Gambassi, Giovanni
    Finne-Soveri, Harriet
    Liperoti, Rosa
    Noro, Anja
    Frijters, Dinnus H. M.
    Cherubini, Antonio
    Dell'Aquila, Giusy
    Ribbe, Miel W.
    [J]. PAIN, 2010, 148 (01) : 70 - 74
  • [3] ACOVE quality indicators
    不详
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2001, 135 (08) : 653 - 667
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2018, Microsoft Excel
  • [5] [Anonymous], DECL HELS
  • [6] Future development of nursing home quality indicators
    Arling, G
    Kane, RL
    Lewis, T
    Mueller, C
    [J]. GERONTOLOGIST, 2005, 45 (02) : 147 - 156
  • [7] A MULTICENTRIC INDIVIDUALLY-TAILORED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF EDUCATION AND PROFESSIONAL SUPPORT TO NURSING HOME STAFF: RESEARCH PROTOCOL AND BASELINE DATA OF THE IQUARE STUDY
    Barreto, P. de Souto
    Lapeyre-Mestre, M.
    Mathieu, C.
    Piau, C.
    Bouget, C.
    Cayla, F.
    Vellas, B.
    Rolland, Y.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUTRITION HEALTH & AGING, 2013, 17 (02) : 173 - 178
  • [8] The effects of staffing on in-bed times of nursing home residents
    Bates-Jensen, BM
    Schnelle, JF
    Alessi, CA
    Al-Samarrai, NR
    Levy-Storms, L
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2004, 52 (06) : 931 - 938
  • [9] Quality Measures for Medication Continuity in Long-Term Care Facilities, Using a Structured Panel Process
    Bell, Chaim M.
    Brener, Stacey S.
    Comrie, Rebecca
    Anderson, Geoffrey M.
    Bronskill, Susan E.
    [J]. DRUGS & AGING, 2012, 29 (04) : 319 - 327
  • [10] Validity of the minimum data set for assessing nutritional status in nursing home residents
    Blaum, CS
    ONeill, EF
    Clements, KM
    Fries, BE
    Fiatarone, MA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 1997, 66 (04) : 787 - 794