The Utility of Minimal Access and Separation Surgery' in the Management of Metastatic Spine Disease

被引:8
作者
Kumar, Naresh [1 ]
Tan, Jiong H. [1 ]
Thomas, Andrew C. [1 ]
Tan, Joel Y. H. [1 ]
Madhu, Sirisha [1 ]
Shen, Liang [2 ]
Lopez, Keith G. [1 ]
Hey, Dennis H. W. [1 ]
Liu, Gabriel [1 ]
Wong, HeeKit [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Hlth Syst, Dept Orthopaed Surg, NUHS Tower Block,Level 11,1E Kent Ridge Rd, Singapore 119228, Singapore
[2] Natl Univ Singapore, Yong Loo Lin Sch Med, Biostat Unit, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
metastatic spine disease; spinal cord compression; spinal instability; minimally invasive spinal surgery; separation surgery; SCREW FIXATION; TUMOR SURGERY; COMPLICATIONS; INSTABILITY; INFECTIONS; OUTCOMES; SYSTEM; CANCER;
D O I
10.1177/21925682211049803
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Objectives: To compare outcomes of percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) to open posterior stabilization (OPS) in spinal instability patients and minimal access separation surgery (MASS) to open posterior stabilization and decompression (OPSD) in metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) patients. Methods: We analysed patients who underwent surgery for thoracolumbar metastatic spine disease (MSD) from Jan 2011 to Oct 2017. Patients were divided into minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) and open spine surgery (OSS) groups. Spinal instability patients were treated with PPSF/OPS with pedicle screws. MSCC patients were treated with MASS/OPSD. Outcomes measured included intraoperative blood loss, operative time, duration of hospital stay and ASIA-score improvement. Time to initiate radiotherapy and perioperative surgical/non-surgical complications was recorded. Propensity scoring adjustment analysis was utilised to address heterogenicity of histological tumour subtypes. Results: Of 200 eligible patients, 61 underwent MISS and 139 underwent OSS for MSD. There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics between MISS and OSS groups. In the MISS group, 28 (45.9%) patients were treated for spinal instability and 33 (54.1%) patients were treated for MSCC. In the OSS group, 15 (10.8%) patients were treated for spinal instability alone and 124 (89.2%) were treated for MSCC. Patients who underwent PPSF had significantly lower blood loss (95 mL vs 564 mL; P <.001) and surgical complication rates(P <.05) with shorter length of stay approaching significance (6 vs 19 days; P =.100) when compared to the OPS group. Patients who underwent MASS had significantly lower blood loss (602 mL vs 1008 mL) and shorter length of stay (10 vs 18 days; P =.098) vs the OPSD group. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the benefits of PPSF and MASS over OPS and OPSD for the treatment of MSD with spinal instability and MSCC, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:1793 / 1802
页数:10
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [31] A revised scoring system for preoperative evaluation of metastatic spine tumor prognosis
    Tokuhashi, Y
    Matsuzaki, H
    Oda, H
    Oshima, M
    Ryu, J
    [J]. SPINE, 2005, 30 (19) : 2186 - 2191
  • [32] Complications After Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation for the Treatment of Unstable Spinal Metastases
    Versteeg, Anne L.
    Verlaan, Jorrit-Jan
    de Baat, Paul
    Jiya, Tim U.
    Stadhouder, Agnita
    Diekerhof, Carel H.
    van Solinge, Guido B.
    Oner, F. Cumhur
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 23 (07) : 2343 - 2349
  • [33] Trends in the surgical treatment for spinal metastasis and the in-hospital patient outcomes in the United States from 2000 to 2009
    Yoshihara, Hiroyuki
    Yoneoka, Daisuke
    [J]. SPINE JOURNAL, 2014, 14 (09) : 1844 - 1849
  • [34] When Less Is More: The indications for MIS Techniques and Separation Surgery in Metastatic Spine Disease
    Zuckerman, Scott L.
    Laufer, Ilya
    Sahgal, Arjun
    Yamada, Yoshiya J.
    Schmidt, Meic H.
    Chou, Dean
    Shin, John H.
    Kumar, Naresh
    Sciubba, Daniel M.
    [J]. SPINE, 2016, 41 (20) : S246 - S253